Cargando…
The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in North America. Two surgical options exist for rectal cancer patients: low anterior resection with re-establishment of bowel continuity, and abdominoperineal resection with a permanent stoma. A rectal cancer decision aid was developed using the International...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-16 |
_version_ | 1782313296690413568 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Robert Boushey, Robin Potter, Beth Stacey, Dawn |
author_facet | Wu, Robert Boushey, Robin Potter, Beth Stacey, Dawn |
author_sort | Wu, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in North America. Two surgical options exist for rectal cancer patients: low anterior resection with re-establishment of bowel continuity, and abdominoperineal resection with a permanent stoma. A rectal cancer decision aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards to facilitate patients being more actively involved in making this decision with the surgeon. The overall aim of this study is to evaluate this decision aid and explore barriers and facilitators to implementing in clinical practice. METHODS: First, a pre- and post- study will be guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Eligible patients from a colorectal cancer center include: 1) adult patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, 2) tumour at a maximum of 10 cm from anal verge, and 3) surgeon screened candidates eligible to consider both low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection. Patients will be given a paper-version and online link to the decision aid to review at home. Using validated tools, the primary outcomes will be decisional conflict and knowledge of surgical options. Secondary outcomes will be patient’s preference, values associated with options, readiness for decision-making, acceptability of the decision aid, and feasibility of its implementation in clinical practice. Proposed analysis includes paired t-test, Wilcoxon, and descriptive statistics. Second, a survey will be conducted to identify the barriers and facilitators of using the decision aid in clinical practice. Eligible participants include Canadian surgeons working with rectal cancer patients. Surgeons will be given a pre-notification, questionnaire, and three reminders. The survey package will include the patient decision aid and a facilitators and barriers survey previously validated among physicians and nurses. Principal component analysis will be performed to determine common themes, and logistic regression will be used to identify variables associated with the intention to use the decision aid. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the impact of the rectal cancer decision aid on patients and help with planning strategies to overcome barriers and facilitate implementation of the decision aid in routine clinical practice. To our knowledge this is the first study designed to evaluate a decision aid in the field of colorectal surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3998110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39981102014-04-25 The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice Wu, Robert Boushey, Robin Potter, Beth Stacey, Dawn BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in North America. Two surgical options exist for rectal cancer patients: low anterior resection with re-establishment of bowel continuity, and abdominoperineal resection with a permanent stoma. A rectal cancer decision aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards to facilitate patients being more actively involved in making this decision with the surgeon. The overall aim of this study is to evaluate this decision aid and explore barriers and facilitators to implementing in clinical practice. METHODS: First, a pre- and post- study will be guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Eligible patients from a colorectal cancer center include: 1) adult patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, 2) tumour at a maximum of 10 cm from anal verge, and 3) surgeon screened candidates eligible to consider both low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection. Patients will be given a paper-version and online link to the decision aid to review at home. Using validated tools, the primary outcomes will be decisional conflict and knowledge of surgical options. Secondary outcomes will be patient’s preference, values associated with options, readiness for decision-making, acceptability of the decision aid, and feasibility of its implementation in clinical practice. Proposed analysis includes paired t-test, Wilcoxon, and descriptive statistics. Second, a survey will be conducted to identify the barriers and facilitators of using the decision aid in clinical practice. Eligible participants include Canadian surgeons working with rectal cancer patients. Surgeons will be given a pre-notification, questionnaire, and three reminders. The survey package will include the patient decision aid and a facilitators and barriers survey previously validated among physicians and nurses. Principal component analysis will be performed to determine common themes, and logistic regression will be used to identify variables associated with the intention to use the decision aid. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the impact of the rectal cancer decision aid on patients and help with planning strategies to overcome barriers and facilitate implementation of the decision aid in routine clinical practice. To our knowledge this is the first study designed to evaluate a decision aid in the field of colorectal surgery. BioMed Central 2014-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3998110/ /pubmed/24655353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-16 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Wu, Robert Boushey, Robin Potter, Beth Stacey, Dawn The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice |
title | The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice |
title_full | The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice |
title_short | The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice |
title_sort | evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wurobert theevaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice AT bousheyrobin theevaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice AT potterbeth theevaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice AT staceydawn theevaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice AT wurobert evaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice AT bousheyrobin evaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice AT potterbeth evaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice AT staceydawn evaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice |