Cargando…

The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in North America. Two surgical options exist for rectal cancer patients: low anterior resection with re-establishment of bowel continuity, and abdominoperineal resection with a permanent stoma. A rectal cancer decision aid was developed using the International...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Robert, Boushey, Robin, Potter, Beth, Stacey, Dawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-16
_version_ 1782313296690413568
author Wu, Robert
Boushey, Robin
Potter, Beth
Stacey, Dawn
author_facet Wu, Robert
Boushey, Robin
Potter, Beth
Stacey, Dawn
author_sort Wu, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in North America. Two surgical options exist for rectal cancer patients: low anterior resection with re-establishment of bowel continuity, and abdominoperineal resection with a permanent stoma. A rectal cancer decision aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards to facilitate patients being more actively involved in making this decision with the surgeon. The overall aim of this study is to evaluate this decision aid and explore barriers and facilitators to implementing in clinical practice. METHODS: First, a pre- and post- study will be guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Eligible patients from a colorectal cancer center include: 1) adult patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, 2) tumour at a maximum of 10 cm from anal verge, and 3) surgeon screened candidates eligible to consider both low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection. Patients will be given a paper-version and online link to the decision aid to review at home. Using validated tools, the primary outcomes will be decisional conflict and knowledge of surgical options. Secondary outcomes will be patient’s preference, values associated with options, readiness for decision-making, acceptability of the decision aid, and feasibility of its implementation in clinical practice. Proposed analysis includes paired t-test, Wilcoxon, and descriptive statistics. Second, a survey will be conducted to identify the barriers and facilitators of using the decision aid in clinical practice. Eligible participants include Canadian surgeons working with rectal cancer patients. Surgeons will be given a pre-notification, questionnaire, and three reminders. The survey package will include the patient decision aid and a facilitators and barriers survey previously validated among physicians and nurses. Principal component analysis will be performed to determine common themes, and logistic regression will be used to identify variables associated with the intention to use the decision aid. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the impact of the rectal cancer decision aid on patients and help with planning strategies to overcome barriers and facilitate implementation of the decision aid in routine clinical practice. To our knowledge this is the first study designed to evaluate a decision aid in the field of colorectal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3998110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39981102014-04-25 The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice Wu, Robert Boushey, Robin Potter, Beth Stacey, Dawn BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in North America. Two surgical options exist for rectal cancer patients: low anterior resection with re-establishment of bowel continuity, and abdominoperineal resection with a permanent stoma. A rectal cancer decision aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards to facilitate patients being more actively involved in making this decision with the surgeon. The overall aim of this study is to evaluate this decision aid and explore barriers and facilitators to implementing in clinical practice. METHODS: First, a pre- and post- study will be guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Eligible patients from a colorectal cancer center include: 1) adult patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, 2) tumour at a maximum of 10 cm from anal verge, and 3) surgeon screened candidates eligible to consider both low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection. Patients will be given a paper-version and online link to the decision aid to review at home. Using validated tools, the primary outcomes will be decisional conflict and knowledge of surgical options. Secondary outcomes will be patient’s preference, values associated with options, readiness for decision-making, acceptability of the decision aid, and feasibility of its implementation in clinical practice. Proposed analysis includes paired t-test, Wilcoxon, and descriptive statistics. Second, a survey will be conducted to identify the barriers and facilitators of using the decision aid in clinical practice. Eligible participants include Canadian surgeons working with rectal cancer patients. Surgeons will be given a pre-notification, questionnaire, and three reminders. The survey package will include the patient decision aid and a facilitators and barriers survey previously validated among physicians and nurses. Principal component analysis will be performed to determine common themes, and logistic regression will be used to identify variables associated with the intention to use the decision aid. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the impact of the rectal cancer decision aid on patients and help with planning strategies to overcome barriers and facilitate implementation of the decision aid in routine clinical practice. To our knowledge this is the first study designed to evaluate a decision aid in the field of colorectal surgery. BioMed Central 2014-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3998110/ /pubmed/24655353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-16 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wu, Robert
Boushey, Robin
Potter, Beth
Stacey, Dawn
The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice
title The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice
title_full The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice
title_fullStr The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice
title_short The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice
title_sort evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-16
work_keys_str_mv AT wurobert theevaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice
AT bousheyrobin theevaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice
AT potterbeth theevaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice
AT staceydawn theevaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice
AT wurobert evaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice
AT bousheyrobin evaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice
AT potterbeth evaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice
AT staceydawn evaluationofarectalcancerdecisionaidandthefactorsinfluencingitsimplementationinclinicalpractice