Cargando…
Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint
The mitotic checkpoint monitors kinetochore–microtubule attachment and prevents anaphase until all kinetochores are stably attached. Checkpoint regulation hinges on the dynamic localization of checkpoint proteins to kinetochores. Unattached, checkpoint-active kinetochores accumulate multiple checkpo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201311113 |
_version_ | 1782313418467835904 |
---|---|
author | Ballister, Edward R. Riegman, Michelle Lampson, Michael A. |
author_facet | Ballister, Edward R. Riegman, Michelle Lampson, Michael A. |
author_sort | Ballister, Edward R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The mitotic checkpoint monitors kinetochore–microtubule attachment and prevents anaphase until all kinetochores are stably attached. Checkpoint regulation hinges on the dynamic localization of checkpoint proteins to kinetochores. Unattached, checkpoint-active kinetochores accumulate multiple checkpoint proteins, which are depleted from kinetochores upon stable attachment, allowing checkpoint silencing. Because multiple proteins are recruited simultaneously to unattached kinetochores, it is not known what changes at kinetochores are essential for anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) inhibition. Using chemically induced dimerization to manipulate protein localization with temporal control, we show that recruiting the checkpoint protein Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the checkpoint without a concomitant increase in kinetochore levels of Mps1 or BubR1. Furthermore, Mad2 binding is necessary but not sufficient for Mad1 to activate the checkpoint; a conserved C-terminal motif is also required. The results of our checkpoint reactivation assay suggest that Mad1, in addition to converting Mad2 to its active conformation, scaffolds formation of a higher-order mitotic checkpoint complex at kinetochores. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3998811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39988112014-09-17 Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint Ballister, Edward R. Riegman, Michelle Lampson, Michael A. J Cell Biol Research Articles The mitotic checkpoint monitors kinetochore–microtubule attachment and prevents anaphase until all kinetochores are stably attached. Checkpoint regulation hinges on the dynamic localization of checkpoint proteins to kinetochores. Unattached, checkpoint-active kinetochores accumulate multiple checkpoint proteins, which are depleted from kinetochores upon stable attachment, allowing checkpoint silencing. Because multiple proteins are recruited simultaneously to unattached kinetochores, it is not known what changes at kinetochores are essential for anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) inhibition. Using chemically induced dimerization to manipulate protein localization with temporal control, we show that recruiting the checkpoint protein Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the checkpoint without a concomitant increase in kinetochore levels of Mps1 or BubR1. Furthermore, Mad2 binding is necessary but not sufficient for Mad1 to activate the checkpoint; a conserved C-terminal motif is also required. The results of our checkpoint reactivation assay suggest that Mad1, in addition to converting Mad2 to its active conformation, scaffolds formation of a higher-order mitotic checkpoint complex at kinetochores. The Rockefeller University Press 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3998811/ /pubmed/24637323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201311113 Text en © 2014 Ballister et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Ballister, Edward R. Riegman, Michelle Lampson, Michael A. Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint |
title | Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint |
title_full | Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint |
title_fullStr | Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint |
title_full_unstemmed | Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint |
title_short | Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint |
title_sort | recruitment of mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201311113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ballisteredwardr recruitmentofmad1tometaphasekinetochoresissufficienttoreactivatethemitoticcheckpoint AT riegmanmichelle recruitmentofmad1tometaphasekinetochoresissufficienttoreactivatethemitoticcheckpoint AT lampsonmichaela recruitmentofmad1tometaphasekinetochoresissufficienttoreactivatethemitoticcheckpoint |