Cargando…

Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint

The mitotic checkpoint monitors kinetochore–microtubule attachment and prevents anaphase until all kinetochores are stably attached. Checkpoint regulation hinges on the dynamic localization of checkpoint proteins to kinetochores. Unattached, checkpoint-active kinetochores accumulate multiple checkpo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballister, Edward R., Riegman, Michelle, Lampson, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201311113
_version_ 1782313418467835904
author Ballister, Edward R.
Riegman, Michelle
Lampson, Michael A.
author_facet Ballister, Edward R.
Riegman, Michelle
Lampson, Michael A.
author_sort Ballister, Edward R.
collection PubMed
description The mitotic checkpoint monitors kinetochore–microtubule attachment and prevents anaphase until all kinetochores are stably attached. Checkpoint regulation hinges on the dynamic localization of checkpoint proteins to kinetochores. Unattached, checkpoint-active kinetochores accumulate multiple checkpoint proteins, which are depleted from kinetochores upon stable attachment, allowing checkpoint silencing. Because multiple proteins are recruited simultaneously to unattached kinetochores, it is not known what changes at kinetochores are essential for anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) inhibition. Using chemically induced dimerization to manipulate protein localization with temporal control, we show that recruiting the checkpoint protein Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the checkpoint without a concomitant increase in kinetochore levels of Mps1 or BubR1. Furthermore, Mad2 binding is necessary but not sufficient for Mad1 to activate the checkpoint; a conserved C-terminal motif is also required. The results of our checkpoint reactivation assay suggest that Mad1, in addition to converting Mad2 to its active conformation, scaffolds formation of a higher-order mitotic checkpoint complex at kinetochores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3998811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39988112014-09-17 Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint Ballister, Edward R. Riegman, Michelle Lampson, Michael A. J Cell Biol Research Articles The mitotic checkpoint monitors kinetochore–microtubule attachment and prevents anaphase until all kinetochores are stably attached. Checkpoint regulation hinges on the dynamic localization of checkpoint proteins to kinetochores. Unattached, checkpoint-active kinetochores accumulate multiple checkpoint proteins, which are depleted from kinetochores upon stable attachment, allowing checkpoint silencing. Because multiple proteins are recruited simultaneously to unattached kinetochores, it is not known what changes at kinetochores are essential for anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) inhibition. Using chemically induced dimerization to manipulate protein localization with temporal control, we show that recruiting the checkpoint protein Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the checkpoint without a concomitant increase in kinetochore levels of Mps1 or BubR1. Furthermore, Mad2 binding is necessary but not sufficient for Mad1 to activate the checkpoint; a conserved C-terminal motif is also required. The results of our checkpoint reactivation assay suggest that Mad1, in addition to converting Mad2 to its active conformation, scaffolds formation of a higher-order mitotic checkpoint complex at kinetochores. The Rockefeller University Press 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3998811/ /pubmed/24637323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201311113 Text en © 2014 Ballister et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ballister, Edward R.
Riegman, Michelle
Lampson, Michael A.
Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint
title Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint
title_full Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint
title_fullStr Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint
title_short Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint
title_sort recruitment of mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201311113
work_keys_str_mv AT ballisteredwardr recruitmentofmad1tometaphasekinetochoresissufficienttoreactivatethemitoticcheckpoint
AT riegmanmichelle recruitmentofmad1tometaphasekinetochoresissufficienttoreactivatethemitoticcheckpoint
AT lampsonmichaela recruitmentofmad1tometaphasekinetochoresissufficienttoreactivatethemitoticcheckpoint