Cargando…

Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted surgery plays an increasingly important role in mandibular reconstruction, ensuring the best possible masticatory function and aesthetic outcome. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to computer-assisted or conventional mandibular reconstruction with vascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayoub, Nassim, Ghassemi, Alireza, Rana, Majeed, Gerressen, Marcus, Riediger, Dieter, Hölzle, Frank, Modabber, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24716651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-114
_version_ 1782313443070574592
author Ayoub, Nassim
Ghassemi, Alireza
Rana, Majeed
Gerressen, Marcus
Riediger, Dieter
Hölzle, Frank
Modabber, Ali
author_facet Ayoub, Nassim
Ghassemi, Alireza
Rana, Majeed
Gerressen, Marcus
Riediger, Dieter
Hölzle, Frank
Modabber, Ali
author_sort Ayoub, Nassim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted surgery plays an increasingly important role in mandibular reconstruction, ensuring the best possible masticatory function and aesthetic outcome. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to computer-assisted or conventional mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft in a prospective study design. Virtual surgical planning was based on preoperative CT-data using specific surgical planning software. A rapid prototyping guide transferred the virtual surgery plan to the operation site. During surgery the transplant ischemic time, reconstruction time, time for shaping the transplant and amount of bone removed were measured. Additionally, the difference in the intercondylar distance before and after surgery was calculated. RESULTS: Computer-assisted surgery shortened the time of transplant ischemia (P < 0.005) and defect reconstruction (P < 0.001) compared to conventional surgery. The time to saw and shape the transplant at the donor site was shorter using conventional surgery (P < 0.005); therefore, the overall time for surgery didn’t change (P = 0.527). In the computer-assisted group, the amount of bone harvested equaled the defect size, whereas the transplant size in the conventional group exceeded the defect site by 16.8 ± 5.6 mm (P < 0.001) on average. The intercondylar distance before compared to after surgery was less affected in the computer-assisted than in the conventional group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presented study shows that computer-assisted surgery can help reduce the time for mandibular defect reconstruction and consequently the transplant ischemic time. In the computer-assisted group, the iliac crest donor site defect was downsized and the postoperative condyle position was less altered, reducing possible risks of postoperative complications and donor site morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00005181.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3998950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39989502014-04-25 Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial Ayoub, Nassim Ghassemi, Alireza Rana, Majeed Gerressen, Marcus Riediger, Dieter Hölzle, Frank Modabber, Ali Trials Research BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted surgery plays an increasingly important role in mandibular reconstruction, ensuring the best possible masticatory function and aesthetic outcome. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to computer-assisted or conventional mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft in a prospective study design. Virtual surgical planning was based on preoperative CT-data using specific surgical planning software. A rapid prototyping guide transferred the virtual surgery plan to the operation site. During surgery the transplant ischemic time, reconstruction time, time for shaping the transplant and amount of bone removed were measured. Additionally, the difference in the intercondylar distance before and after surgery was calculated. RESULTS: Computer-assisted surgery shortened the time of transplant ischemia (P < 0.005) and defect reconstruction (P < 0.001) compared to conventional surgery. The time to saw and shape the transplant at the donor site was shorter using conventional surgery (P < 0.005); therefore, the overall time for surgery didn’t change (P = 0.527). In the computer-assisted group, the amount of bone harvested equaled the defect size, whereas the transplant size in the conventional group exceeded the defect site by 16.8 ± 5.6 mm (P < 0.001) on average. The intercondylar distance before compared to after surgery was less affected in the computer-assisted than in the conventional group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presented study shows that computer-assisted surgery can help reduce the time for mandibular defect reconstruction and consequently the transplant ischemic time. In the computer-assisted group, the iliac crest donor site defect was downsized and the postoperative condyle position was less altered, reducing possible risks of postoperative complications and donor site morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00005181. BioMed Central 2014-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3998950/ /pubmed/24716651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-114 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ayoub et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ayoub, Nassim
Ghassemi, Alireza
Rana, Majeed
Gerressen, Marcus
Riediger, Dieter
Hölzle, Frank
Modabber, Ali
Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_full Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_short Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_sort evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24716651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-114
work_keys_str_mv AT ayoubnassim evaluationofcomputerassistedmandibularreconstructionwithvascularizediliaccrestbonegraftcomparedtoconventionalsurgeryarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT ghassemialireza evaluationofcomputerassistedmandibularreconstructionwithvascularizediliaccrestbonegraftcomparedtoconventionalsurgeryarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT ranamajeed evaluationofcomputerassistedmandibularreconstructionwithvascularizediliaccrestbonegraftcomparedtoconventionalsurgeryarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT gerressenmarcus evaluationofcomputerassistedmandibularreconstructionwithvascularizediliaccrestbonegraftcomparedtoconventionalsurgeryarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT riedigerdieter evaluationofcomputerassistedmandibularreconstructionwithvascularizediliaccrestbonegraftcomparedtoconventionalsurgeryarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT holzlefrank evaluationofcomputerassistedmandibularreconstructionwithvascularizediliaccrestbonegraftcomparedtoconventionalsurgeryarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT modabberali evaluationofcomputerassistedmandibularreconstructionwithvascularizediliaccrestbonegraftcomparedtoconventionalsurgeryarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial