Cargando…
Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7 |
_version_ | 1782313490028953600 |
---|---|
author | Mauri, Giovanni Porazzi, Emanuele Cova, Luca Restelli, Umberto Tondolo, Tania Bonfanti, Marzia Cerri, Anna Ierace, Tiziana Croce, Davide Solbiati, Luigi |
author_facet | Mauri, Giovanni Porazzi, Emanuele Cova, Luca Restelli, Umberto Tondolo, Tania Bonfanti, Marzia Cerri, Anna Ierace, Tiziana Croce, Davide Solbiati, Luigi |
author_sort | Mauri, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93 patients were treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and immediate assessment by intraprocedural CEUS. Clinical impact, cost effectiveness, and budget, organisational and equity impacts were evaluated and compared with standard treatment without intraprocedural CEUS using the health technology assessment approach. RESULTS: Intraprocedural CEUS detected incomplete ablation in 34/93 (36.5 %) patients, who underwent additional treatment during the same session. At 24-h, complete ablation was found in 88/93 (94.6 %) patients. Thus, a second session of treatment was spared in 29/93 (31.1 %) patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an advantage for the use of intraprocedural CEUS in comparison with standard treatment (4,639 vs 6,592) with a 21.9 % reduction of the costs to treat the whole sample. Cost per patient for complete treatment was € 4,609 versus € 5,872 respectively. The introduction of intraprocedural CEUS resulted in a low organisational impact, and in a positive impact on equity CONCLUSIONS: Intraprocedural use of CEUS has a relevant clinical impact, reducing the number of re-treatments and the related costs per patient. TEACHING POINTS: • CEUS allows to immediately asses the result of ablation. • Intraprocedural CEUS decreases the number of second ablative sessions. • Intraprocedural CEUS may reduce cost per patient for complete treatment. • Use of intraprocedural CEUS may reduce hospital budget. • Its introduction has low organisational impact, and relevant impact on equity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3999370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39993702014-04-25 Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment Mauri, Giovanni Porazzi, Emanuele Cova, Luca Restelli, Umberto Tondolo, Tania Bonfanti, Marzia Cerri, Anna Ierace, Tiziana Croce, Davide Solbiati, Luigi Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93 patients were treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and immediate assessment by intraprocedural CEUS. Clinical impact, cost effectiveness, and budget, organisational and equity impacts were evaluated and compared with standard treatment without intraprocedural CEUS using the health technology assessment approach. RESULTS: Intraprocedural CEUS detected incomplete ablation in 34/93 (36.5 %) patients, who underwent additional treatment during the same session. At 24-h, complete ablation was found in 88/93 (94.6 %) patients. Thus, a second session of treatment was spared in 29/93 (31.1 %) patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an advantage for the use of intraprocedural CEUS in comparison with standard treatment (4,639 vs 6,592) with a 21.9 % reduction of the costs to treat the whole sample. Cost per patient for complete treatment was € 4,609 versus € 5,872 respectively. The introduction of intraprocedural CEUS resulted in a low organisational impact, and in a positive impact on equity CONCLUSIONS: Intraprocedural use of CEUS has a relevant clinical impact, reducing the number of re-treatments and the related costs per patient. TEACHING POINTS: • CEUS allows to immediately asses the result of ablation. • Intraprocedural CEUS decreases the number of second ablative sessions. • Intraprocedural CEUS may reduce cost per patient for complete treatment. • Use of intraprocedural CEUS may reduce hospital budget. • Its introduction has low organisational impact, and relevant impact on equity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3999370/ /pubmed/24563244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mauri, Giovanni Porazzi, Emanuele Cova, Luca Restelli, Umberto Tondolo, Tania Bonfanti, Marzia Cerri, Anna Ierace, Tiziana Croce, Davide Solbiati, Luigi Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment |
title | Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment |
title_full | Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment |
title_fullStr | Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment |
title_short | Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment |
title_sort | intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ceus) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maurigiovanni intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT porazziemanuele intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT covaluca intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT restelliumberto intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT tondolotania intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT bonfantimarzia intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT cerrianna intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT ieracetiziana intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT crocedavide intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment AT solbiatiluigi intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment |