Cargando…

Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mauri, Giovanni, Porazzi, Emanuele, Cova, Luca, Restelli, Umberto, Tondolo, Tania, Bonfanti, Marzia, Cerri, Anna, Ierace, Tiziana, Croce, Davide, Solbiati, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7
_version_ 1782313490028953600
author Mauri, Giovanni
Porazzi, Emanuele
Cova, Luca
Restelli, Umberto
Tondolo, Tania
Bonfanti, Marzia
Cerri, Anna
Ierace, Tiziana
Croce, Davide
Solbiati, Luigi
author_facet Mauri, Giovanni
Porazzi, Emanuele
Cova, Luca
Restelli, Umberto
Tondolo, Tania
Bonfanti, Marzia
Cerri, Anna
Ierace, Tiziana
Croce, Davide
Solbiati, Luigi
author_sort Mauri, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93 patients were treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and immediate assessment by intraprocedural CEUS. Clinical impact, cost effectiveness, and budget, organisational and equity impacts were evaluated and compared with standard treatment without intraprocedural CEUS using the health technology assessment approach. RESULTS: Intraprocedural CEUS detected incomplete ablation in 34/93 (36.5 %) patients, who underwent additional treatment during the same session. At 24-h, complete ablation was found in 88/93 (94.6 %) patients. Thus, a second session of treatment was spared in 29/93 (31.1 %) patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an advantage for the use of intraprocedural CEUS in comparison with standard treatment (4,639 vs 6,592) with a 21.9 % reduction of the costs to treat the whole sample. Cost per patient for complete treatment was € 4,609 versus € 5,872 respectively. The introduction of intraprocedural CEUS resulted in a low organisational impact, and in a positive impact on equity CONCLUSIONS: Intraprocedural use of CEUS has a relevant clinical impact, reducing the number of re-treatments and the related costs per patient. TEACHING POINTS: • CEUS allows to immediately asses the result of ablation. • Intraprocedural CEUS decreases the number of second ablative sessions. • Intraprocedural CEUS may reduce cost per patient for complete treatment. • Use of intraprocedural CEUS may reduce hospital budget. • Its introduction has low organisational impact, and relevant impact on equity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3999370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39993702014-04-25 Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment Mauri, Giovanni Porazzi, Emanuele Cova, Luca Restelli, Umberto Tondolo, Tania Bonfanti, Marzia Cerri, Anna Ierace, Tiziana Croce, Davide Solbiati, Luigi Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93 patients were treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and immediate assessment by intraprocedural CEUS. Clinical impact, cost effectiveness, and budget, organisational and equity impacts were evaluated and compared with standard treatment without intraprocedural CEUS using the health technology assessment approach. RESULTS: Intraprocedural CEUS detected incomplete ablation in 34/93 (36.5 %) patients, who underwent additional treatment during the same session. At 24-h, complete ablation was found in 88/93 (94.6 %) patients. Thus, a second session of treatment was spared in 29/93 (31.1 %) patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an advantage for the use of intraprocedural CEUS in comparison with standard treatment (4,639 vs 6,592) with a 21.9 % reduction of the costs to treat the whole sample. Cost per patient for complete treatment was € 4,609 versus € 5,872 respectively. The introduction of intraprocedural CEUS resulted in a low organisational impact, and in a positive impact on equity CONCLUSIONS: Intraprocedural use of CEUS has a relevant clinical impact, reducing the number of re-treatments and the related costs per patient. TEACHING POINTS: • CEUS allows to immediately asses the result of ablation. • Intraprocedural CEUS decreases the number of second ablative sessions. • Intraprocedural CEUS may reduce cost per patient for complete treatment. • Use of intraprocedural CEUS may reduce hospital budget. • Its introduction has low organisational impact, and relevant impact on equity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3999370/ /pubmed/24563244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mauri, Giovanni
Porazzi, Emanuele
Cova, Luca
Restelli, Umberto
Tondolo, Tania
Bonfanti, Marzia
Cerri, Anna
Ierace, Tiziana
Croce, Davide
Solbiati, Luigi
Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
title Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
title_full Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
title_fullStr Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
title_full_unstemmed Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
title_short Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
title_sort intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ceus) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7
work_keys_str_mv AT maurigiovanni intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT porazziemanuele intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT covaluca intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT restelliumberto intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT tondolotania intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT bonfantimarzia intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT cerrianna intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT ieracetiziana intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT crocedavide intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT solbiatiluigi intraproceduralcontrastenhancedultrasoundceusinliverpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationclinicalimpactandhealthtechnologyassessment