Cargando…
Screening: the information individuals need to support their decision: per protocol analysis is better than intention-to-treat analysis at quantifying potential benefits and harms of screening
BACKGROUND: Providing individuals with the information necessary to make informed decisions is now considered an ethical standard for health systems and general practitioners. DISCUSSION: Results from intention-to-treat analysis have thus far been used to illustrate screening benefits and harms, but...
Autor principal: | Giorgi Rossi, Paolo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24678628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-28 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The risk-benefit task of research ethics committees: An evaluation of current approaches and the need to incorporate decision studies methods
por: Bernabe, Rosemarie D L C, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Cytomegalovirus in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen
por: Walker, Susan P, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Message to complementary and alternative medicine: evidence is a better friend than power
por: Vickers, Andrew J
Publicado: (2001) -
Applying strategies from libertarian paternalism to decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening
por: Wheeler, David C, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Medical concepts related to individual risk are better explained with "plausibility" rather than "probability"
por: Grossi, Enzo
Publicado: (2005)