Cargando…

Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1

INTRODUCTION: Interprofessional patient care is a well-recognized path that health care systems are striving toward. The Veteran’s Affairs (VA) system initiated interprofessional practice (IPP) models with their Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) programs. GEM programs incorporate a range of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattacharya, Shelley B, Rossi, Michelle I, Mentz, Jennifer M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790456
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S51010
_version_ 1782313591316152320
author Bhattacharya, Shelley B
Rossi, Michelle I
Mentz, Jennifer M
author_facet Bhattacharya, Shelley B
Rossi, Michelle I
Mentz, Jennifer M
author_sort Bhattacharya, Shelley B
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Interprofessional patient care is a well-recognized path that health care systems are striving toward. The Veteran’s Affairs (VA) system initiated interprofessional practice (IPP) models with their Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) programs. GEM programs incorporate a range of specialties, including but not limited to, medicine, nursing, social work, physical therapy and pharmacy, to collaboratively evaluate veterans. Despite being a valuable resource, they are now faced with significant cut-backs, including closures. The primary goal of this project was to assess how the GEM model could be optimized at the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania VA to allow for the sustainability of this important IPP assessment. Part 1 of the study evaluated the IPP process using program, patient, and family surveys. Part 2 examined how well the geriatrician matched patients to specialists in the GEM model. This paper describes Part 1 of our study. METHODS: Three strategies were used: 1) a national GEM program survey; 2) a veteran/family satisfaction survey; and 3) an absentee assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 92 programs responded to the GEM IPP survey. Six strategies were shared to optimize IPP models throughout the country. Of the 34 satisfaction surveys, 80% stated the GEM clinic was beneficial, 79% stated their concerns were addressed, and 100% would recommend GEM to their friends. Of the 24 absentee assessments, the top three reasons for missing the appointments were transportation, medical illnesses, and not knowing/remembering about the appointment. Absentee rate diminished from 41% to 19% after instituting a reminder phone call policy. DISCUSSION: Maintaining the sustainability of IPP programs is crucial for the health of our veterans. This project uncovered tools to improve the GEM IPP model for our veterans that can be incorporated nationally. Despite the lengthy nature of IPP models, patients and families appreciated the thoroughness, requested transportation and food, and responded well to reminder phone calls. A keen eye on these issues and concomitant medical complexity needs to be observed when planning IPP models to ensure sustainability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4000184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40001842014-04-30 Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1 Bhattacharya, Shelley B Rossi, Michelle I Mentz, Jennifer M J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research INTRODUCTION: Interprofessional patient care is a well-recognized path that health care systems are striving toward. The Veteran’s Affairs (VA) system initiated interprofessional practice (IPP) models with their Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) programs. GEM programs incorporate a range of specialties, including but not limited to, medicine, nursing, social work, physical therapy and pharmacy, to collaboratively evaluate veterans. Despite being a valuable resource, they are now faced with significant cut-backs, including closures. The primary goal of this project was to assess how the GEM model could be optimized at the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania VA to allow for the sustainability of this important IPP assessment. Part 1 of the study evaluated the IPP process using program, patient, and family surveys. Part 2 examined how well the geriatrician matched patients to specialists in the GEM model. This paper describes Part 1 of our study. METHODS: Three strategies were used: 1) a national GEM program survey; 2) a veteran/family satisfaction survey; and 3) an absentee assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 92 programs responded to the GEM IPP survey. Six strategies were shared to optimize IPP models throughout the country. Of the 34 satisfaction surveys, 80% stated the GEM clinic was beneficial, 79% stated their concerns were addressed, and 100% would recommend GEM to their friends. Of the 24 absentee assessments, the top three reasons for missing the appointments were transportation, medical illnesses, and not knowing/remembering about the appointment. Absentee rate diminished from 41% to 19% after instituting a reminder phone call policy. DISCUSSION: Maintaining the sustainability of IPP programs is crucial for the health of our veterans. This project uncovered tools to improve the GEM IPP model for our veterans that can be incorporated nationally. Despite the lengthy nature of IPP models, patients and families appreciated the thoroughness, requested transportation and food, and responded well to reminder phone calls. A keen eye on these issues and concomitant medical complexity needs to be observed when planning IPP models to ensure sustainability. Dove Medical Press 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4000184/ /pubmed/24790456 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S51010 Text en © 2014 Bhattacharya et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bhattacharya, Shelley B
Rossi, Michelle I
Mentz, Jennifer M
Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1
title Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1
title_full Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1
title_fullStr Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1
title_short Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1
title_sort optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790456
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S51010
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattacharyashelleyb optimizingstrategiestoimproveinterprofessionalpracticeforveteranspart1
AT rossimichellei optimizingstrategiestoimproveinterprofessionalpracticeforveteranspart1
AT mentzjenniferm optimizingstrategiestoimproveinterprofessionalpracticeforveteranspart1