Cargando…

Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus

Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus and affects 10–15% of the Western population. Previous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left auditory cortex on tinnitus loudness, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joos, Kathleen, De Ridder, Dirk, Van de Heyning, Paul, Vanneste, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930860
_version_ 1782313644368855040
author Joos, Kathleen
De Ridder, Dirk
Van de Heyning, Paul
Vanneste, Sven
author_facet Joos, Kathleen
De Ridder, Dirk
Van de Heyning, Paul
Vanneste, Sven
author_sort Joos, Kathleen
collection PubMed
description Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus and affects 10–15% of the Western population. Previous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left auditory cortex on tinnitus loudness, but the effect of this presumed excitatory stimulation contradicts with the underlying pathophysiological model of tinnitus. Therefore, we included 175 patients with chronic tinnitus to study polarity specific effects of a single tDCS session over the auditory cortex (39 anodal, 136 cathodal). To assess the effect of treatment, we used the numeric rating scale for tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant main effect for tinnitus loudness and annoyance, but for tinnitus annoyance anodal stimulation has a significantly more pronounced effect than cathodal stimulation. We hypothesize that the suppressive effect of tDCS on tinnitus loudness may be attributed to a disrupting effect of ongoing neural hyperactivity, independent of the inhibitory or excitatory effects and that the reduction of annoyance may be induced by influencing adjacent or functionally connected brain areas involved in the tinnitus related distress network. Further research is required to explain why only anodal stimulation has a suppressive effect on tinnitus annoyance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4000666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40006662014-05-08 Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus Joos, Kathleen De Ridder, Dirk Van de Heyning, Paul Vanneste, Sven Neural Plast Clinical Study Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus and affects 10–15% of the Western population. Previous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left auditory cortex on tinnitus loudness, but the effect of this presumed excitatory stimulation contradicts with the underlying pathophysiological model of tinnitus. Therefore, we included 175 patients with chronic tinnitus to study polarity specific effects of a single tDCS session over the auditory cortex (39 anodal, 136 cathodal). To assess the effect of treatment, we used the numeric rating scale for tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant main effect for tinnitus loudness and annoyance, but for tinnitus annoyance anodal stimulation has a significantly more pronounced effect than cathodal stimulation. We hypothesize that the suppressive effect of tDCS on tinnitus loudness may be attributed to a disrupting effect of ongoing neural hyperactivity, independent of the inhibitory or excitatory effects and that the reduction of annoyance may be induced by influencing adjacent or functionally connected brain areas involved in the tinnitus related distress network. Further research is required to explain why only anodal stimulation has a suppressive effect on tinnitus annoyance. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4000666/ /pubmed/24812586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930860 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kathleen Joos et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Joos, Kathleen
De Ridder, Dirk
Van de Heyning, Paul
Vanneste, Sven
Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus
title Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus
title_full Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus
title_fullStr Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus
title_full_unstemmed Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus
title_short Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus
title_sort polarity specific suppression effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930860
work_keys_str_mv AT jooskathleen polarityspecificsuppressioneffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationfortinnitus
AT deridderdirk polarityspecificsuppressioneffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationfortinnitus
AT vandeheyningpaul polarityspecificsuppressioneffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationfortinnitus
AT vannestesven polarityspecificsuppressioneffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationfortinnitus