Cargando…
Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus
Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus and affects 10–15% of the Western population. Previous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left auditory cortex on tinnitus loudness, b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930860 |
_version_ | 1782313644368855040 |
---|---|
author | Joos, Kathleen De Ridder, Dirk Van de Heyning, Paul Vanneste, Sven |
author_facet | Joos, Kathleen De Ridder, Dirk Van de Heyning, Paul Vanneste, Sven |
author_sort | Joos, Kathleen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus and affects 10–15% of the Western population. Previous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left auditory cortex on tinnitus loudness, but the effect of this presumed excitatory stimulation contradicts with the underlying pathophysiological model of tinnitus. Therefore, we included 175 patients with chronic tinnitus to study polarity specific effects of a single tDCS session over the auditory cortex (39 anodal, 136 cathodal). To assess the effect of treatment, we used the numeric rating scale for tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant main effect for tinnitus loudness and annoyance, but for tinnitus annoyance anodal stimulation has a significantly more pronounced effect than cathodal stimulation. We hypothesize that the suppressive effect of tDCS on tinnitus loudness may be attributed to a disrupting effect of ongoing neural hyperactivity, independent of the inhibitory or excitatory effects and that the reduction of annoyance may be induced by influencing adjacent or functionally connected brain areas involved in the tinnitus related distress network. Further research is required to explain why only anodal stimulation has a suppressive effect on tinnitus annoyance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4000666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40006662014-05-08 Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus Joos, Kathleen De Ridder, Dirk Van de Heyning, Paul Vanneste, Sven Neural Plast Clinical Study Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus and affects 10–15% of the Western population. Previous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left auditory cortex on tinnitus loudness, but the effect of this presumed excitatory stimulation contradicts with the underlying pathophysiological model of tinnitus. Therefore, we included 175 patients with chronic tinnitus to study polarity specific effects of a single tDCS session over the auditory cortex (39 anodal, 136 cathodal). To assess the effect of treatment, we used the numeric rating scale for tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant main effect for tinnitus loudness and annoyance, but for tinnitus annoyance anodal stimulation has a significantly more pronounced effect than cathodal stimulation. We hypothesize that the suppressive effect of tDCS on tinnitus loudness may be attributed to a disrupting effect of ongoing neural hyperactivity, independent of the inhibitory or excitatory effects and that the reduction of annoyance may be induced by influencing adjacent or functionally connected brain areas involved in the tinnitus related distress network. Further research is required to explain why only anodal stimulation has a suppressive effect on tinnitus annoyance. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4000666/ /pubmed/24812586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930860 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kathleen Joos et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Joos, Kathleen De Ridder, Dirk Van de Heyning, Paul Vanneste, Sven Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus |
title | Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus |
title_full | Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus |
title_fullStr | Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus |
title_short | Polarity Specific Suppression Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Tinnitus |
title_sort | polarity specific suppression effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/930860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jooskathleen polarityspecificsuppressioneffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationfortinnitus AT deridderdirk polarityspecificsuppressioneffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationfortinnitus AT vandeheyningpaul polarityspecificsuppressioneffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationfortinnitus AT vannestesven polarityspecificsuppressioneffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationfortinnitus |