Cargando…

Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers

 INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the apical sealing ability of AH26, AH Plus and AH Plus Jet using the fluid filtration model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 70 single-rooted teeth were dissected from the cement-enamel junction. Canals were prepared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akhavan, Hengameh, Zahdabadi, Farhad, Mehrvarzfar, Peyman, Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24778685
_version_ 1782313646633779200
author Akhavan, Hengameh
Zahdabadi, Farhad
Mehrvarzfar, Peyman
Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid
author_facet Akhavan, Hengameh
Zahdabadi, Farhad
Mehrvarzfar, Peyman
Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid
author_sort Akhavan, Hengameh
collection PubMed
description  INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the apical sealing ability of AH26, AH Plus and AH Plus Jet using the fluid filtration model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 70 single-rooted teeth were dissected from the cement-enamel junction. Canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary system and hand K-files and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Ten teeth were assigned to the control group and divided into 5 positive and 5 negative controls. Remaining specimens were divided into 3 groups of 20 samples each and filled with gutta percha by lateral condensation technique. Each sample group was filled with either AH26, AH Plus or AH Plus Jet. Microleakage was assessed on the 2(nd) and 30(th) day by the amount of air bubble movement within the capillary glass tube connected to the root. One-way ANOVA test was used for analysis. RESULTS: AH Plus Jet had the least microleakage value and AH Plus presented the highest rate; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, all three studied sealers provided satisfactory seal within the two time intervals. AH Plus Jet demonstrated slightly lower microleakage values; therefore, its application can be recommended in endodontic therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4000676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40006762014-04-28 Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers Akhavan, Hengameh Zahdabadi, Farhad Mehrvarzfar, Peyman Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid Iran Endod J Original Article  INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the apical sealing ability of AH26, AH Plus and AH Plus Jet using the fluid filtration model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 70 single-rooted teeth were dissected from the cement-enamel junction. Canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary system and hand K-files and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Ten teeth were assigned to the control group and divided into 5 positive and 5 negative controls. Remaining specimens were divided into 3 groups of 20 samples each and filled with gutta percha by lateral condensation technique. Each sample group was filled with either AH26, AH Plus or AH Plus Jet. Microleakage was assessed on the 2(nd) and 30(th) day by the amount of air bubble movement within the capillary glass tube connected to the root. One-way ANOVA test was used for analysis. RESULTS: AH Plus Jet had the least microleakage value and AH Plus presented the highest rate; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, all three studied sealers provided satisfactory seal within the two time intervals. AH Plus Jet demonstrated slightly lower microleakage values; therefore, its application can be recommended in endodontic therapy. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2011 2011-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4000676/ /pubmed/24778685 Text en © 2011, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Akhavan, Hengameh
Zahdabadi, Farhad
Mehrvarzfar, Peyman
Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid
Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers
title Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers
title_full Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers
title_fullStr Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers
title_short Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers
title_sort comparative study on the microleakage of three root canal sealers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24778685
work_keys_str_mv AT akhavanhengameh comparativestudyonthemicroleakageofthreerootcanalsealers
AT zahdabadifarhad comparativestudyonthemicroleakageofthreerootcanalsealers
AT mehrvarzfarpeyman comparativestudyonthemicroleakageofthreerootcanalsealers
AT ahmadibirjandianahid comparativestudyonthemicroleakageofthreerootcanalsealers