Cargando…
Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the apical sealing ability of AH26, AH Plus and AH Plus Jet using the fluid filtration model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 70 single-rooted teeth were dissected from the cement-enamel junction. Canals were prepared...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24778685 |
_version_ | 1782313646633779200 |
---|---|
author | Akhavan, Hengameh Zahdabadi, Farhad Mehrvarzfar, Peyman Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid |
author_facet | Akhavan, Hengameh Zahdabadi, Farhad Mehrvarzfar, Peyman Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid |
author_sort | Akhavan, Hengameh |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the apical sealing ability of AH26, AH Plus and AH Plus Jet using the fluid filtration model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 70 single-rooted teeth were dissected from the cement-enamel junction. Canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary system and hand K-files and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Ten teeth were assigned to the control group and divided into 5 positive and 5 negative controls. Remaining specimens were divided into 3 groups of 20 samples each and filled with gutta percha by lateral condensation technique. Each sample group was filled with either AH26, AH Plus or AH Plus Jet. Microleakage was assessed on the 2(nd) and 30(th) day by the amount of air bubble movement within the capillary glass tube connected to the root. One-way ANOVA test was used for analysis. RESULTS: AH Plus Jet had the least microleakage value and AH Plus presented the highest rate; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, all three studied sealers provided satisfactory seal within the two time intervals. AH Plus Jet demonstrated slightly lower microleakage values; therefore, its application can be recommended in endodontic therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4000676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Iranian Center for Endodontic Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40006762014-04-28 Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers Akhavan, Hengameh Zahdabadi, Farhad Mehrvarzfar, Peyman Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine and compare the apical sealing ability of AH26, AH Plus and AH Plus Jet using the fluid filtration model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 70 single-rooted teeth were dissected from the cement-enamel junction. Canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary system and hand K-files and irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Ten teeth were assigned to the control group and divided into 5 positive and 5 negative controls. Remaining specimens were divided into 3 groups of 20 samples each and filled with gutta percha by lateral condensation technique. Each sample group was filled with either AH26, AH Plus or AH Plus Jet. Microleakage was assessed on the 2(nd) and 30(th) day by the amount of air bubble movement within the capillary glass tube connected to the root. One-way ANOVA test was used for analysis. RESULTS: AH Plus Jet had the least microleakage value and AH Plus presented the highest rate; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, all three studied sealers provided satisfactory seal within the two time intervals. AH Plus Jet demonstrated slightly lower microleakage values; therefore, its application can be recommended in endodontic therapy. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2011 2011-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4000676/ /pubmed/24778685 Text en © 2011, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Akhavan, Hengameh Zahdabadi, Farhad Mehrvarzfar, Peyman Ahmadi Birjandi, Anahid Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers |
title | Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers |
title_full | Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers |
title_short | Comparative Study on the Microleakage of Three Root Canal Sealers |
title_sort | comparative study on the microleakage of three root canal sealers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24778685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akhavanhengameh comparativestudyonthemicroleakageofthreerootcanalsealers AT zahdabadifarhad comparativestudyonthemicroleakageofthreerootcanalsealers AT mehrvarzfarpeyman comparativestudyonthemicroleakageofthreerootcanalsealers AT ahmadibirjandianahid comparativestudyonthemicroleakageofthreerootcanalsealers |