Cargando…

The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces

In the present study, we investigated age-related differences in the processing of emotional stimuli. Specifically, we were interested in whether older adults would show deficits in unbinding emotional expression (i.e., either no emotion, happiness, anger, or disgust) from bound stimuli (i.e., photo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pehlivanoglu, Didem, Jain, Shivangi, Ariel, Robert, Verhaeghen, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24795660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00253
_version_ 1782313693223059456
author Pehlivanoglu, Didem
Jain, Shivangi
Ariel, Robert
Verhaeghen, Paul
author_facet Pehlivanoglu, Didem
Jain, Shivangi
Ariel, Robert
Verhaeghen, Paul
author_sort Pehlivanoglu, Didem
collection PubMed
description In the present study, we investigated age-related differences in the processing of emotional stimuli. Specifically, we were interested in whether older adults would show deficits in unbinding emotional expression (i.e., either no emotion, happiness, anger, or disgust) from bound stimuli (i.e., photographs of faces expressing these emotions), as a hyper-binding account of age-related differences in working memory would predict. Younger and older adults completed different N-Back tasks (side-by-side 0-Back, 1-Back, 2-Back) under three conditions: match/mismatch judgments based on either the identity of the face (identity condition), the face’s emotional expression (expression condition), or both identity and expression of the face (both condition). The two age groups performed more slowly and with lower accuracy in the expression condition than in the both condition, indicating the presence of an unbinding process. This unbinding effect was more pronounced in older adults than in younger adults, but only in the 2-Back task. Thus, older adults seemed to have a specific deficit in unbinding in working memory. Additionally, no age-related differences were found in accuracy in the 0-Back task, but such differences emerged in the 1-Back task, and were further magnified in the 2-Back task, indicating independent age-related differences in attention/STM and working memory. Pupil dilation data confirmed that the attention/STM version of the task (1-Back) is more effortful for older adults than younger adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4001040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40010402014-05-02 The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces Pehlivanoglu, Didem Jain, Shivangi Ariel, Robert Verhaeghen, Paul Front Psychol Psychology In the present study, we investigated age-related differences in the processing of emotional stimuli. Specifically, we were interested in whether older adults would show deficits in unbinding emotional expression (i.e., either no emotion, happiness, anger, or disgust) from bound stimuli (i.e., photographs of faces expressing these emotions), as a hyper-binding account of age-related differences in working memory would predict. Younger and older adults completed different N-Back tasks (side-by-side 0-Back, 1-Back, 2-Back) under three conditions: match/mismatch judgments based on either the identity of the face (identity condition), the face’s emotional expression (expression condition), or both identity and expression of the face (both condition). The two age groups performed more slowly and with lower accuracy in the expression condition than in the both condition, indicating the presence of an unbinding process. This unbinding effect was more pronounced in older adults than in younger adults, but only in the 2-Back task. Thus, older adults seemed to have a specific deficit in unbinding in working memory. Additionally, no age-related differences were found in accuracy in the 0-Back task, but such differences emerged in the 1-Back task, and were further magnified in the 2-Back task, indicating independent age-related differences in attention/STM and working memory. Pupil dilation data confirmed that the attention/STM version of the task (1-Back) is more effortful for older adults than younger adults. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4001040/ /pubmed/24795660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00253 Text en Copyright © 2014 Pehlivanoglu, Jain, Ariel and Verhaeghen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pehlivanoglu, Didem
Jain, Shivangi
Ariel, Robert
Verhaeghen, Paul
The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces
title The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces
title_full The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces
title_fullStr The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces
title_full_unstemmed The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces
title_short The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces
title_sort ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24795660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00253
work_keys_str_mv AT pehlivanogludidem thetiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces
AT jainshivangi thetiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces
AT arielrobert thetiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces
AT verhaeghenpaul thetiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces
AT pehlivanogludidem tiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces
AT jainshivangi tiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces
AT arielrobert tiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces
AT verhaeghenpaul tiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces