Cargando…
The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces
In the present study, we investigated age-related differences in the processing of emotional stimuli. Specifically, we were interested in whether older adults would show deficits in unbinding emotional expression (i.e., either no emotion, happiness, anger, or disgust) from bound stimuli (i.e., photo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24795660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00253 |
_version_ | 1782313693223059456 |
---|---|
author | Pehlivanoglu, Didem Jain, Shivangi Ariel, Robert Verhaeghen, Paul |
author_facet | Pehlivanoglu, Didem Jain, Shivangi Ariel, Robert Verhaeghen, Paul |
author_sort | Pehlivanoglu, Didem |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present study, we investigated age-related differences in the processing of emotional stimuli. Specifically, we were interested in whether older adults would show deficits in unbinding emotional expression (i.e., either no emotion, happiness, anger, or disgust) from bound stimuli (i.e., photographs of faces expressing these emotions), as a hyper-binding account of age-related differences in working memory would predict. Younger and older adults completed different N-Back tasks (side-by-side 0-Back, 1-Back, 2-Back) under three conditions: match/mismatch judgments based on either the identity of the face (identity condition), the face’s emotional expression (expression condition), or both identity and expression of the face (both condition). The two age groups performed more slowly and with lower accuracy in the expression condition than in the both condition, indicating the presence of an unbinding process. This unbinding effect was more pronounced in older adults than in younger adults, but only in the 2-Back task. Thus, older adults seemed to have a specific deficit in unbinding in working memory. Additionally, no age-related differences were found in accuracy in the 0-Back task, but such differences emerged in the 1-Back task, and were further magnified in the 2-Back task, indicating independent age-related differences in attention/STM and working memory. Pupil dilation data confirmed that the attention/STM version of the task (1-Back) is more effortful for older adults than younger adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4001040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40010402014-05-02 The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces Pehlivanoglu, Didem Jain, Shivangi Ariel, Robert Verhaeghen, Paul Front Psychol Psychology In the present study, we investigated age-related differences in the processing of emotional stimuli. Specifically, we were interested in whether older adults would show deficits in unbinding emotional expression (i.e., either no emotion, happiness, anger, or disgust) from bound stimuli (i.e., photographs of faces expressing these emotions), as a hyper-binding account of age-related differences in working memory would predict. Younger and older adults completed different N-Back tasks (side-by-side 0-Back, 1-Back, 2-Back) under three conditions: match/mismatch judgments based on either the identity of the face (identity condition), the face’s emotional expression (expression condition), or both identity and expression of the face (both condition). The two age groups performed more slowly and with lower accuracy in the expression condition than in the both condition, indicating the presence of an unbinding process. This unbinding effect was more pronounced in older adults than in younger adults, but only in the 2-Back task. Thus, older adults seemed to have a specific deficit in unbinding in working memory. Additionally, no age-related differences were found in accuracy in the 0-Back task, but such differences emerged in the 1-Back task, and were further magnified in the 2-Back task, indicating independent age-related differences in attention/STM and working memory. Pupil dilation data confirmed that the attention/STM version of the task (1-Back) is more effortful for older adults than younger adults. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4001040/ /pubmed/24795660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00253 Text en Copyright © 2014 Pehlivanoglu, Jain, Ariel and Verhaeghen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Pehlivanoglu, Didem Jain, Shivangi Ariel, Robert Verhaeghen, Paul The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces |
title | The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces |
title_full | The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces |
title_fullStr | The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces |
title_full_unstemmed | The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces |
title_short | The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces |
title_sort | ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24795660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pehlivanogludidem thetiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces AT jainshivangi thetiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces AT arielrobert thetiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces AT verhaeghenpaul thetiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces AT pehlivanogludidem tiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces AT jainshivangi tiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces AT arielrobert tiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces AT verhaeghenpaul tiestounbindagerelateddifferencesinfeatureunbindinginworkingmemoryforemotionalfaces |