Cargando…

A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons

The present survey was conducted among gynaecological surgeons from several European countries to assess the actual knowledge and practice related to post-surgical adhesions and measures for reduction. From September 1, 2012 to February 6, 2013, gynaecological surgeons were invited to answer an 18-i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallwiener, Markus, Koninckx, Philippe Robert, Hackethal, Andreas, Brölmann, Hans, Lundorff, Per, Mara, Michal, Wattiez, Arnaud, De Wilde, Rudy Leon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4003340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24795546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0824-2
_version_ 1782313837900333056
author Wallwiener, Markus
Koninckx, Philippe Robert
Hackethal, Andreas
Brölmann, Hans
Lundorff, Per
Mara, Michal
Wattiez, Arnaud
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
author_facet Wallwiener, Markus
Koninckx, Philippe Robert
Hackethal, Andreas
Brölmann, Hans
Lundorff, Per
Mara, Michal
Wattiez, Arnaud
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
author_sort Wallwiener, Markus
collection PubMed
description The present survey was conducted among gynaecological surgeons from several European countries to assess the actual knowledge and practice related to post-surgical adhesions and measures for reduction. From September 1, 2012 to February 6, 2013, gynaecological surgeons were invited to answer an 18-item online questionnaire accessible through the ESGE website. This questionnaire contained eight questions on care settings and surgical practice and ten questions on adhesion formation and adhesion reduction. Four hundred fourteen surgeons participated; 70.8 % agreed that adhesions are a source of major morbidity. About half of them declared that adhesions represented an important part of their daily medical and surgical work. About two thirds informed their patients about the risk of adhesion. Most cited causes of adhesions were abdominal infections and extensive tissue trauma, and endometriosis and myomectomy surgery. Fewer surgeons expected adhesion formation after laparoscopy (18.9 %) than after laparotomy (40.8 %); 60 % knew the surgical techniques recommended to reduce adhesions; only 44.3 % used adhesion-reduction agents on a regular basis. This survey gives a broad picture of adhesion awareness amongst European gynaecological surgeons, mainly from Germany and the UK. The participants had a good knowledge of factors causing adhesions. Knowledge of surgical techniques recommended and use of anti-adhesion agents developed to reduce adhesions need to be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4003340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40033402014-04-30 A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons Wallwiener, Markus Koninckx, Philippe Robert Hackethal, Andreas Brölmann, Hans Lundorff, Per Mara, Michal Wattiez, Arnaud De Wilde, Rudy Leon Gynecol Surg Original Article The present survey was conducted among gynaecological surgeons from several European countries to assess the actual knowledge and practice related to post-surgical adhesions and measures for reduction. From September 1, 2012 to February 6, 2013, gynaecological surgeons were invited to answer an 18-item online questionnaire accessible through the ESGE website. This questionnaire contained eight questions on care settings and surgical practice and ten questions on adhesion formation and adhesion reduction. Four hundred fourteen surgeons participated; 70.8 % agreed that adhesions are a source of major morbidity. About half of them declared that adhesions represented an important part of their daily medical and surgical work. About two thirds informed their patients about the risk of adhesion. Most cited causes of adhesions were abdominal infections and extensive tissue trauma, and endometriosis and myomectomy surgery. Fewer surgeons expected adhesion formation after laparoscopy (18.9 %) than after laparotomy (40.8 %); 60 % knew the surgical techniques recommended to reduce adhesions; only 44.3 % used adhesion-reduction agents on a regular basis. This survey gives a broad picture of adhesion awareness amongst European gynaecological surgeons, mainly from Germany and the UK. The participants had a good knowledge of factors causing adhesions. Knowledge of surgical techniques recommended and use of anti-adhesion agents developed to reduce adhesions need to be improved. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-11-27 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4003340/ /pubmed/24795546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0824-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wallwiener, Markus
Koninckx, Philippe Robert
Hackethal, Andreas
Brölmann, Hans
Lundorff, Per
Mara, Michal
Wattiez, Arnaud
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
title A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
title_full A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
title_fullStr A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
title_full_unstemmed A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
title_short A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
title_sort european survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4003340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24795546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0824-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wallwienermarkus aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT koninckxphilipperobert aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT hackethalandreas aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT brolmannhans aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT lundorffper aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT maramichal aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT wattiezarnaud aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT dewilderudyleon aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT wallwienermarkus europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT koninckxphilipperobert europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT hackethalandreas europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT brolmannhans europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT lundorffper europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT maramichal europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT wattiezarnaud europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT dewilderudyleon europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons
AT europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons