Cargando…
A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons
The present survey was conducted among gynaecological surgeons from several European countries to assess the actual knowledge and practice related to post-surgical adhesions and measures for reduction. From September 1, 2012 to February 6, 2013, gynaecological surgeons were invited to answer an 18-i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4003340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24795546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0824-2 |
_version_ | 1782313837900333056 |
---|---|
author | Wallwiener, Markus Koninckx, Philippe Robert Hackethal, Andreas Brölmann, Hans Lundorff, Per Mara, Michal Wattiez, Arnaud De Wilde, Rudy Leon |
author_facet | Wallwiener, Markus Koninckx, Philippe Robert Hackethal, Andreas Brölmann, Hans Lundorff, Per Mara, Michal Wattiez, Arnaud De Wilde, Rudy Leon |
author_sort | Wallwiener, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present survey was conducted among gynaecological surgeons from several European countries to assess the actual knowledge and practice related to post-surgical adhesions and measures for reduction. From September 1, 2012 to February 6, 2013, gynaecological surgeons were invited to answer an 18-item online questionnaire accessible through the ESGE website. This questionnaire contained eight questions on care settings and surgical practice and ten questions on adhesion formation and adhesion reduction. Four hundred fourteen surgeons participated; 70.8 % agreed that adhesions are a source of major morbidity. About half of them declared that adhesions represented an important part of their daily medical and surgical work. About two thirds informed their patients about the risk of adhesion. Most cited causes of adhesions were abdominal infections and extensive tissue trauma, and endometriosis and myomectomy surgery. Fewer surgeons expected adhesion formation after laparoscopy (18.9 %) than after laparotomy (40.8 %); 60 % knew the surgical techniques recommended to reduce adhesions; only 44.3 % used adhesion-reduction agents on a regular basis. This survey gives a broad picture of adhesion awareness amongst European gynaecological surgeons, mainly from Germany and the UK. The participants had a good knowledge of factors causing adhesions. Knowledge of surgical techniques recommended and use of anti-adhesion agents developed to reduce adhesions need to be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4003340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40033402014-04-30 A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons Wallwiener, Markus Koninckx, Philippe Robert Hackethal, Andreas Brölmann, Hans Lundorff, Per Mara, Michal Wattiez, Arnaud De Wilde, Rudy Leon Gynecol Surg Original Article The present survey was conducted among gynaecological surgeons from several European countries to assess the actual knowledge and practice related to post-surgical adhesions and measures for reduction. From September 1, 2012 to February 6, 2013, gynaecological surgeons were invited to answer an 18-item online questionnaire accessible through the ESGE website. This questionnaire contained eight questions on care settings and surgical practice and ten questions on adhesion formation and adhesion reduction. Four hundred fourteen surgeons participated; 70.8 % agreed that adhesions are a source of major morbidity. About half of them declared that adhesions represented an important part of their daily medical and surgical work. About two thirds informed their patients about the risk of adhesion. Most cited causes of adhesions were abdominal infections and extensive tissue trauma, and endometriosis and myomectomy surgery. Fewer surgeons expected adhesion formation after laparoscopy (18.9 %) than after laparotomy (40.8 %); 60 % knew the surgical techniques recommended to reduce adhesions; only 44.3 % used adhesion-reduction agents on a regular basis. This survey gives a broad picture of adhesion awareness amongst European gynaecological surgeons, mainly from Germany and the UK. The participants had a good knowledge of factors causing adhesions. Knowledge of surgical techniques recommended and use of anti-adhesion agents developed to reduce adhesions need to be improved. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-11-27 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4003340/ /pubmed/24795546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0824-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wallwiener, Markus Koninckx, Philippe Robert Hackethal, Andreas Brölmann, Hans Lundorff, Per Mara, Michal Wattiez, Arnaud De Wilde, Rudy Leon A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons |
title | A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons |
title_full | A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons |
title_fullStr | A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons |
title_full_unstemmed | A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons |
title_short | A European survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons |
title_sort | european survey on awareness of post-surgical adhesions among gynaecological surgeons |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4003340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24795546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0824-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallwienermarkus aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT koninckxphilipperobert aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT hackethalandreas aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT brolmannhans aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT lundorffper aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT maramichal aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT wattiezarnaud aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT dewilderudyleon aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT aeuropeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT wallwienermarkus europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT koninckxphilipperobert europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT hackethalandreas europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT brolmannhans europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT lundorffper europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT maramichal europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT wattiezarnaud europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT dewilderudyleon europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons AT europeansurveyonawarenessofpostsurgicaladhesionsamonggynaecologicalsurgeons |