Cargando…

Primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children aged between 2 and 12 yearsand 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as a conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica or traction followed by hip spica with closed reduct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruhullah, Mohammad, Singh, H. R., Shah, Sanjay, Shrestha, Dipak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4003711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24791042
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.129638
_version_ 1782313869490782208
author Ruhullah, Mohammad
Singh, H. R.
Shah, Sanjay
Shrestha, Dipak
author_facet Ruhullah, Mohammad
Singh, H. R.
Shah, Sanjay
Shrestha, Dipak
author_sort Ruhullah, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children aged between 2 and 12 yearsand 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as a conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica or traction followed by hip spica with closed reduction and fixation with retrogradely passed crossed Rush pins for diaphyseal femur fracture in 25 children of the age group 3-12 years, randomly distributed in each group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty children (age: 3-13 years, mean; 9 years) with femoral fractures were evaluated; 25 of them underwent the conservative treatment using immediate hip spica (group A) and 25 underwent treatment with crossed retrograde Rush pins (group B). RESULTS: Mean duration of fracture union was within 15 weeks in group A and 12 weeks in group B. Mean duration of weight bearing was 14weeks in group A and 7 weeks in group A. Mean hospital stay were 4 days in group A and 8days in group B. The man follow-up period was 16 months in group A and 17 months in group B. Complications like angulation, shortening and infection were compared. Bursitis and penetration of pins at the site of Rush pin insertion is a complication associated with this method of treatment. CONCLUSION: Closed reduction and internal fixation with crossed Rush pins was a superior treatment method in terms of early weight bearing and restoration of normal anatomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4003711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40037112014-05-01 Primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study Ruhullah, Mohammad Singh, H. R. Shah, Sanjay Shrestha, Dipak Niger Med J Original Article BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children aged between 2 and 12 yearsand 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as a conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica or traction followed by hip spica with closed reduction and fixation with retrogradely passed crossed Rush pins for diaphyseal femur fracture in 25 children of the age group 3-12 years, randomly distributed in each group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty children (age: 3-13 years, mean; 9 years) with femoral fractures were evaluated; 25 of them underwent the conservative treatment using immediate hip spica (group A) and 25 underwent treatment with crossed retrograde Rush pins (group B). RESULTS: Mean duration of fracture union was within 15 weeks in group A and 12 weeks in group B. Mean duration of weight bearing was 14weeks in group A and 7 weeks in group A. Mean hospital stay were 4 days in group A and 8days in group B. The man follow-up period was 16 months in group A and 17 months in group B. Complications like angulation, shortening and infection were compared. Bursitis and penetration of pins at the site of Rush pin insertion is a complication associated with this method of treatment. CONCLUSION: Closed reduction and internal fixation with crossed Rush pins was a superior treatment method in terms of early weight bearing and restoration of normal anatomy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4003711/ /pubmed/24791042 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.129638 Text en Copyright: © Nigerian Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ruhullah, Mohammad
Singh, H. R.
Shah, Sanjay
Shrestha, Dipak
Primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study
title Primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study
title_full Primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study
title_fullStr Primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study
title_short Primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study
title_sort primary hip spica with crossed retrograde intramedullary rush pins for the management of diaphyseal femur fractures in children: a prospective, randomized study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4003711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24791042
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.129638
work_keys_str_mv AT ruhullahmohammad primaryhipspicawithcrossedretrogradeintramedullaryrushpinsforthemanagementofdiaphysealfemurfracturesinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT singhhr primaryhipspicawithcrossedretrogradeintramedullaryrushpinsforthemanagementofdiaphysealfemurfracturesinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT shahsanjay primaryhipspicawithcrossedretrogradeintramedullaryrushpinsforthemanagementofdiaphysealfemurfracturesinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT shresthadipak primaryhipspicawithcrossedretrogradeintramedullaryrushpinsforthemanagementofdiaphysealfemurfracturesinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedstudy