Cargando…

Influence of Surface Position along the Working Range of Conoscopic Holography Sensors on Dimensional Verification of AISI 316 Wire EDM Machined Surfaces

Conoscopic holography (CH) is a non-contact interferometric technique used for surface digitization which presents several advantages over other optical techniques such as laser triangulation. Among others, the ability for the reconstruction of high-sloped surfaces stands out, and so does its lower...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández, Pedro, Blanco, David, Rico, Carlos, Valiño, Gonzalo, Mateos, Sabino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4003954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24662452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140304495
_version_ 1782313912461426688
author Fernández, Pedro
Blanco, David
Rico, Carlos
Valiño, Gonzalo
Mateos, Sabino
author_facet Fernández, Pedro
Blanco, David
Rico, Carlos
Valiño, Gonzalo
Mateos, Sabino
author_sort Fernández, Pedro
collection PubMed
description Conoscopic holography (CH) is a non-contact interferometric technique used for surface digitization which presents several advantages over other optical techniques such as laser triangulation. Among others, the ability for the reconstruction of high-sloped surfaces stands out, and so does its lower dependence on surface optical properties. Nevertheless, similarly to other optical systems, adjustment of CH sensors requires an adequate selection of configuration parameters for ensuring a high quality surface digitizing. This should be done on a surface located as close as possible to the stand-off distance by tuning frequency (F) and power (P) until the quality indicators Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and signal envelope (Total) meet proper values. However, not all the points of an actual surface are located at the stand-off distance, but they could be located throughout the whole working range (WR). Thus, the quality of a digitized surface may not be uniform. The present work analyses how the quality of a reconstructed surface is affected by its relative position within the WR under different combinations of the parameters F and P. Experiments have been conducted on AISI 316 wire EDM machined flat surfaces. The number of high-quality points digitized as well as distance measurements between different surfaces throughout the WR allowed for comparing the metrological behaviour of the CH sensor with respect to a touch probe (TP) on a CMM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4003954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40039542014-04-29 Influence of Surface Position along the Working Range of Conoscopic Holography Sensors on Dimensional Verification of AISI 316 Wire EDM Machined Surfaces Fernández, Pedro Blanco, David Rico, Carlos Valiño, Gonzalo Mateos, Sabino Sensors (Basel) Article Conoscopic holography (CH) is a non-contact interferometric technique used for surface digitization which presents several advantages over other optical techniques such as laser triangulation. Among others, the ability for the reconstruction of high-sloped surfaces stands out, and so does its lower dependence on surface optical properties. Nevertheless, similarly to other optical systems, adjustment of CH sensors requires an adequate selection of configuration parameters for ensuring a high quality surface digitizing. This should be done on a surface located as close as possible to the stand-off distance by tuning frequency (F) and power (P) until the quality indicators Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and signal envelope (Total) meet proper values. However, not all the points of an actual surface are located at the stand-off distance, but they could be located throughout the whole working range (WR). Thus, the quality of a digitized surface may not be uniform. The present work analyses how the quality of a reconstructed surface is affected by its relative position within the WR under different combinations of the parameters F and P. Experiments have been conducted on AISI 316 wire EDM machined flat surfaces. The number of high-quality points digitized as well as distance measurements between different surfaces throughout the WR allowed for comparing the metrological behaviour of the CH sensor with respect to a touch probe (TP) on a CMM. MDPI 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4003954/ /pubmed/24662452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140304495 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fernández, Pedro
Blanco, David
Rico, Carlos
Valiño, Gonzalo
Mateos, Sabino
Influence of Surface Position along the Working Range of Conoscopic Holography Sensors on Dimensional Verification of AISI 316 Wire EDM Machined Surfaces
title Influence of Surface Position along the Working Range of Conoscopic Holography Sensors on Dimensional Verification of AISI 316 Wire EDM Machined Surfaces
title_full Influence of Surface Position along the Working Range of Conoscopic Holography Sensors on Dimensional Verification of AISI 316 Wire EDM Machined Surfaces
title_fullStr Influence of Surface Position along the Working Range of Conoscopic Holography Sensors on Dimensional Verification of AISI 316 Wire EDM Machined Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Surface Position along the Working Range of Conoscopic Holography Sensors on Dimensional Verification of AISI 316 Wire EDM Machined Surfaces
title_short Influence of Surface Position along the Working Range of Conoscopic Holography Sensors on Dimensional Verification of AISI 316 Wire EDM Machined Surfaces
title_sort influence of surface position along the working range of conoscopic holography sensors on dimensional verification of aisi 316 wire edm machined surfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4003954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24662452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140304495
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezpedro influenceofsurfacepositionalongtheworkingrangeofconoscopicholographysensorsondimensionalverificationofaisi316wireedmmachinedsurfaces
AT blancodavid influenceofsurfacepositionalongtheworkingrangeofconoscopicholographysensorsondimensionalverificationofaisi316wireedmmachinedsurfaces
AT ricocarlos influenceofsurfacepositionalongtheworkingrangeofconoscopicholographysensorsondimensionalverificationofaisi316wireedmmachinedsurfaces
AT valinogonzalo influenceofsurfacepositionalongtheworkingrangeofconoscopicholographysensorsondimensionalverificationofaisi316wireedmmachinedsurfaces
AT mateossabino influenceofsurfacepositionalongtheworkingrangeofconoscopicholographysensorsondimensionalverificationofaisi316wireedmmachinedsurfaces