Cargando…

Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs

BACKGROUND: CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a prokaryotic adaptive defence system that provides resistance against alien replicons such as viruses and plasmids. Spacers in a CRISPR cassette confer immunity against viruses and plasmids containing regions compleme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gogleva, Anna A, Gelfand, Mikhail S, Artamonova, Irena I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4004331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24628983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-202
_version_ 1782313967448752128
author Gogleva, Anna A
Gelfand, Mikhail S
Artamonova, Irena I
author_facet Gogleva, Anna A
Gelfand, Mikhail S
Artamonova, Irena I
author_sort Gogleva, Anna A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a prokaryotic adaptive defence system that provides resistance against alien replicons such as viruses and plasmids. Spacers in a CRISPR cassette confer immunity against viruses and plasmids containing regions complementary to the spacers and hence they retain a footprint of interactions between prokaryotes and their viruses in individual strains and ecosystems. The human gut is a rich habitat populated by numerous microorganisms, but a large fraction of these are unculturable and little is known about them in general and their CRISPR systems in particular. RESULTS: We used human gut metagenomic data from three open projects in order to characterize the composition and dynamics of CRISPR cassettes in the human-associated microbiota. Applying available CRISPR-identification algorithms and a previously designed filtering procedure to the assembled human gut metagenomic contigs, we found 388 CRISPR cassettes, 373 of which had repeats not observed previously in complete genomes or other datasets. Only 171 of 3,545 identified spacers were coupled with protospacers from the human gut metagenomic contigs. The number of matches to GenBank sequences was negligible, providing protospacers for 26 spacers. Reconstruction of CRISPR cassettes allowed us to track the dynamics of spacer content. In agreement with other published observations we show that spacers shared by different cassettes (and hence likely older ones) tend to the trailer ends, whereas spacers with matches in the metagenomes are distributed unevenly across cassettes, demonstrating a preference to form clusters closer to the active end of a CRISPR cassette, adjacent to the leader, and hence suggesting dynamical interactions between prokaryotes and viruses in the human gut. Remarkably, spacers match protospacers in the metagenome of the same individual with frequency comparable to a random control, but may match protospacers from metagenomes of other individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of assembled contigs is complementary to the approach based on the analysis of original reads and hence provides additional data about composition and evolution of CRISPR cassettes, revealing the dynamics of CRISPR-phage interactions in metagenomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-202) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4004331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40043312014-04-30 Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs Gogleva, Anna A Gelfand, Mikhail S Artamonova, Irena I BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a prokaryotic adaptive defence system that provides resistance against alien replicons such as viruses and plasmids. Spacers in a CRISPR cassette confer immunity against viruses and plasmids containing regions complementary to the spacers and hence they retain a footprint of interactions between prokaryotes and their viruses in individual strains and ecosystems. The human gut is a rich habitat populated by numerous microorganisms, but a large fraction of these are unculturable and little is known about them in general and their CRISPR systems in particular. RESULTS: We used human gut metagenomic data from three open projects in order to characterize the composition and dynamics of CRISPR cassettes in the human-associated microbiota. Applying available CRISPR-identification algorithms and a previously designed filtering procedure to the assembled human gut metagenomic contigs, we found 388 CRISPR cassettes, 373 of which had repeats not observed previously in complete genomes or other datasets. Only 171 of 3,545 identified spacers were coupled with protospacers from the human gut metagenomic contigs. The number of matches to GenBank sequences was negligible, providing protospacers for 26 spacers. Reconstruction of CRISPR cassettes allowed us to track the dynamics of spacer content. In agreement with other published observations we show that spacers shared by different cassettes (and hence likely older ones) tend to the trailer ends, whereas spacers with matches in the metagenomes are distributed unevenly across cassettes, demonstrating a preference to form clusters closer to the active end of a CRISPR cassette, adjacent to the leader, and hence suggesting dynamical interactions between prokaryotes and viruses in the human gut. Remarkably, spacers match protospacers in the metagenome of the same individual with frequency comparable to a random control, but may match protospacers from metagenomes of other individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of assembled contigs is complementary to the approach based on the analysis of original reads and hence provides additional data about composition and evolution of CRISPR cassettes, revealing the dynamics of CRISPR-phage interactions in metagenomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-202) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4004331/ /pubmed/24628983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-202 Text en © Gogleva et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gogleva, Anna A
Gelfand, Mikhail S
Artamonova, Irena I
Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs
title Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs
title_full Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs
title_short Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs
title_sort comparative analysis of crispr cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4004331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24628983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-202
work_keys_str_mv AT goglevaannaa comparativeanalysisofcrisprcassettesfromthehumangutmetagenomiccontigs
AT gelfandmikhails comparativeanalysisofcrisprcassettesfromthehumangutmetagenomiccontigs
AT artamonovairenai comparativeanalysisofcrisprcassettesfromthehumangutmetagenomiccontigs