Cargando…
Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils
Observational databanks have inherent strengths and shortcomings. As in randomized controlled trials, poor design of these databanks can either exaggerate or reduce estimates of drug effectiveness and can limit generalizability. This commentary highlights selected aspects of study design, data colle...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC400435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15059263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar1151 |
_version_ | 1782121352166113280 |
---|---|
author | Krishnan, Eswar Fries, James F |
author_facet | Krishnan, Eswar Fries, James F |
author_sort | Krishnan, Eswar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Observational databanks have inherent strengths and shortcomings. As in randomized controlled trials, poor design of these databanks can either exaggerate or reduce estimates of drug effectiveness and can limit generalizability. This commentary highlights selected aspects of study design, data collection and statistical analysis that can help overcome many of these inadequacies. An international metaRegister and a formal mechanism for standardizing and sharing drug data could help improve the utility of databanks. Medical journals have a vital role in enforcing a quality checklist that improves reporting. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-400435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4004352004-04-30 Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils Krishnan, Eswar Fries, James F Arthritis Res Ther Commentary Observational databanks have inherent strengths and shortcomings. As in randomized controlled trials, poor design of these databanks can either exaggerate or reduce estimates of drug effectiveness and can limit generalizability. This commentary highlights selected aspects of study design, data collection and statistical analysis that can help overcome many of these inadequacies. An international metaRegister and a formal mechanism for standardizing and sharing drug data could help improve the utility of databanks. Medical journals have a vital role in enforcing a quality checklist that improves reporting. BioMed Central 2004 2004-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC400435/ /pubmed/15059263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar1151 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Krishnan, Eswar Fries, James F Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils |
title | Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils |
title_full | Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils |
title_fullStr | Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils |
title_short | Measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils |
title_sort | measuring effectiveness of drugs in observational databanks: promises and perils |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC400435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15059263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar1151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krishnaneswar measuringeffectivenessofdrugsinobservationaldatabankspromisesandperils AT friesjamesf measuringeffectivenessofdrugsinobservationaldatabankspromisesandperils |