Cargando…
Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm
BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm is open reduction and fixation using dynamic compression plates (DCP) and screws. This technique uses screw placement in all 6 or more of the plate holes except the hole over the fracture line. We hypothesized that DCP with select...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kowsar
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4004990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829892 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.4497 |
_version_ | 1782314045061201920 |
---|---|
author | Mehdi Nasab, Seyed Abdolhossein Sarrafan, Nasser Sabahi, Saeed |
author_facet | Mehdi Nasab, Seyed Abdolhossein Sarrafan, Nasser Sabahi, Saeed |
author_sort | Mehdi Nasab, Seyed Abdolhossein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm is open reduction and fixation using dynamic compression plates (DCP) and screws. This technique uses screw placement in all 6 or more of the plate holes except the hole over the fracture line. We hypothesized that DCP with selective 4-screw bicortical placement can provide adequate fixation for these fractures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of conventional 6 or more screw fixation versus 4 screw fixation for adults with diaphyseal fractures of the forearm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 128 fractures of the ulna, radius or both bones of the forearm in 87 patients were treated in either one of these two groups: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with conventional DCP and screws or ORIF using DCP and selective 4- screw placement. Fractures were transverse or oblique in pattern without gross comminution. In a total of 41 patients with fractures, 28 single ulnar and 18 single radius fractures were included. Follow-up visits were done at 3-6 and 12-16 weeks and at 6 months. Outcome with respect to union an nonunion rates, union time, infection, and device failure was noted. RESULTS: No change in alignment was noted in any patient. Union time in conventional and selective bicortical 4-screw fixation was 74.8 days and 73.6 days respectively which showed no significant difference (P = 0.064). Union rate and infection was 92.1% and 3.2% in conventional and 95.3% and 0% in the selective group respectively. Non-union was observed in 5 and 3 cases of fractures in conventional and the selective group respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For treatment of the transverse or oblique diaphyseal fractures of the forearm, fixation by a same length 3.5 mm DCP with selective 4-screw cortical fixation (2 screws on each side of the fracture site) had similar results in comparison with conventional 6 or more DCP screws. Because of lesser impact on host bone and smaller incision, the selective 4-screw insertion can be an alternative technique for treatment of these fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4004990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Kowsar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40049902014-05-14 Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm Mehdi Nasab, Seyed Abdolhossein Sarrafan, Nasser Sabahi, Saeed Trauma Mon Original Article BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm is open reduction and fixation using dynamic compression plates (DCP) and screws. This technique uses screw placement in all 6 or more of the plate holes except the hole over the fracture line. We hypothesized that DCP with selective 4-screw bicortical placement can provide adequate fixation for these fractures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of conventional 6 or more screw fixation versus 4 screw fixation for adults with diaphyseal fractures of the forearm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 128 fractures of the ulna, radius or both bones of the forearm in 87 patients were treated in either one of these two groups: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with conventional DCP and screws or ORIF using DCP and selective 4- screw placement. Fractures were transverse or oblique in pattern without gross comminution. In a total of 41 patients with fractures, 28 single ulnar and 18 single radius fractures were included. Follow-up visits were done at 3-6 and 12-16 weeks and at 6 months. Outcome with respect to union an nonunion rates, union time, infection, and device failure was noted. RESULTS: No change in alignment was noted in any patient. Union time in conventional and selective bicortical 4-screw fixation was 74.8 days and 73.6 days respectively which showed no significant difference (P = 0.064). Union rate and infection was 92.1% and 3.2% in conventional and 95.3% and 0% in the selective group respectively. Non-union was observed in 5 and 3 cases of fractures in conventional and the selective group respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For treatment of the transverse or oblique diaphyseal fractures of the forearm, fixation by a same length 3.5 mm DCP with selective 4-screw cortical fixation (2 screws on each side of the fracture site) had similar results in comparison with conventional 6 or more DCP screws. Because of lesser impact on host bone and smaller incision, the selective 4-screw insertion can be an alternative technique for treatment of these fractures. Kowsar 2012-05-26 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC4004990/ /pubmed/24829892 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.4497 Text en Copyright ©2012, Kowsar Corp. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mehdi Nasab, Seyed Abdolhossein Sarrafan, Nasser Sabahi, Saeed Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm |
title | Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm |
title_full | Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm |
title_fullStr | Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm |
title_full_unstemmed | Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm |
title_short | Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm |
title_sort | four-screw plate fixation vs conventional fixation for diaphyseal fractures of the forearm |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4004990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829892 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.4497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehdinasabseyedabdolhossein fourscrewplatefixationvsconventionalfixationfordiaphysealfracturesoftheforearm AT sarrafannasser fourscrewplatefixationvsconventionalfixationfordiaphysealfracturesoftheforearm AT sabahisaeed fourscrewplatefixationvsconventionalfixationfordiaphysealfracturesoftheforearm |