Cargando…
Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field
BACKGROUND: Decentralization through the establishment of hospital governing boards has been touted as an effective way to improve the quality and efficiency of hospitals in low-income countries. Although several studies have examined the process of decentralization, few have quantitatively assessed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4005012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24742180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-178 |
_version_ | 1782314048033914880 |
---|---|
author | McNatt, Zahirah Thompson, Jennifer W Mengistu, Abraham Tatek, Dawit Linnander, Erika Ageze, Leulseged Lawson, Ruth Berhanu, Negalign Bradley, Elizabeth H |
author_facet | McNatt, Zahirah Thompson, Jennifer W Mengistu, Abraham Tatek, Dawit Linnander, Erika Ageze, Leulseged Lawson, Ruth Berhanu, Negalign Bradley, Elizabeth H |
author_sort | McNatt, Zahirah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Decentralization through the establishment of hospital governing boards has been touted as an effective way to improve the quality and efficiency of hospitals in low-income countries. Although several studies have examined the process of decentralization, few have quantitatively assessed the implementation of hospital governing boards and their impact on hospital performance. Therefore, we sought to describe the functioning of governing boards and to determine the association between governing board functioning and hospital performance. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study with governing board chairpersons to assess board (1) structure, (2) roles and responsibilities and (3) training and orientation practices. Using bivariate analysis and multivariable regression, we examined the association between governing board functioning and hospital performance. Hospital performance indicators: 1) percent of hospital management standards met, measured with the Ethiopian Hospital Reform Implementation Guidelines and 2) patient experience, measured with the Inpatient and Outpatient Assessment of Healthcare surveys. RESULTS: A total of 92 boards responded to the survey (96% response rate). The average percentage of EHRIG standards met was 58.1% (standard deviation (SD) 21.7 percentage points), and the mean overall patient experience score was 7.2 (SD 2.2). Hospitals with greater hospital management standards met had governing boards that paid members, reviewed performance in several domains quarterly or more frequently, developed new revenue sources, determined services to be outsourced, reviewed patient complaints, and had members with knowledge in business and financial management (all P-values < 0.05). Hospitals with more positive patient experience had governing boards that developed new revenue sources, determined services to be outsourced, and reviewed patient complaints (all P-values < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These cross-sectional data suggest that strengthening governing boards to perform essential responsibilities may result in improved hospital performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4005012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40050122014-05-01 Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field McNatt, Zahirah Thompson, Jennifer W Mengistu, Abraham Tatek, Dawit Linnander, Erika Ageze, Leulseged Lawson, Ruth Berhanu, Negalign Bradley, Elizabeth H BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Decentralization through the establishment of hospital governing boards has been touted as an effective way to improve the quality and efficiency of hospitals in low-income countries. Although several studies have examined the process of decentralization, few have quantitatively assessed the implementation of hospital governing boards and their impact on hospital performance. Therefore, we sought to describe the functioning of governing boards and to determine the association between governing board functioning and hospital performance. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study with governing board chairpersons to assess board (1) structure, (2) roles and responsibilities and (3) training and orientation practices. Using bivariate analysis and multivariable regression, we examined the association between governing board functioning and hospital performance. Hospital performance indicators: 1) percent of hospital management standards met, measured with the Ethiopian Hospital Reform Implementation Guidelines and 2) patient experience, measured with the Inpatient and Outpatient Assessment of Healthcare surveys. RESULTS: A total of 92 boards responded to the survey (96% response rate). The average percentage of EHRIG standards met was 58.1% (standard deviation (SD) 21.7 percentage points), and the mean overall patient experience score was 7.2 (SD 2.2). Hospitals with greater hospital management standards met had governing boards that paid members, reviewed performance in several domains quarterly or more frequently, developed new revenue sources, determined services to be outsourced, reviewed patient complaints, and had members with knowledge in business and financial management (all P-values < 0.05). Hospitals with more positive patient experience had governing boards that developed new revenue sources, determined services to be outsourced, and reviewed patient complaints (all P-values < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These cross-sectional data suggest that strengthening governing boards to perform essential responsibilities may result in improved hospital performance. BioMed Central 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4005012/ /pubmed/24742180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-178 Text en Copyright © 2014 McNatt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McNatt, Zahirah Thompson, Jennifer W Mengistu, Abraham Tatek, Dawit Linnander, Erika Ageze, Leulseged Lawson, Ruth Berhanu, Negalign Bradley, Elizabeth H Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field |
title | Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field |
title_full | Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field |
title_fullStr | Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field |
title_short | Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field |
title_sort | implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4005012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24742180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcnattzahirah implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield AT thompsonjenniferw implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield AT mengistuabraham implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield AT tatekdawit implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield AT linnandererika implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield AT agezeleulseged implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield AT lawsonruth implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield AT berhanunegalign implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield AT bradleyelizabethh implementationofhospitalgoverningboardsviewsfromthefield |