Cargando…

‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Extensive literature exists on public involvement or engagement, but what actual tools or guides exist that are practical, tested and easy to use specifically for initiating and implementing patient and family engagement, is uncertain. No comprehensive review and synthesis of general int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kovacs Burns, Katharina, Bellows, Mandy, Eigenseher, Carol, Gallivan, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4005635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24735787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-175
_version_ 1782314130134269952
author Kovacs Burns, Katharina
Bellows, Mandy
Eigenseher, Carol
Gallivan, Jennifer
author_facet Kovacs Burns, Katharina
Bellows, Mandy
Eigenseher, Carol
Gallivan, Jennifer
author_sort Kovacs Burns, Katharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extensive literature exists on public involvement or engagement, but what actual tools or guides exist that are practical, tested and easy to use specifically for initiating and implementing patient and family engagement, is uncertain. No comprehensive review and synthesis of general international published or grey literature on this specific topic was found. A systematic scoping review of published and grey literature is, therefore, appropriate for searching through the vast general engagement literature to identify ‘patient/family engagement’ tools and guides applicable in health organization decision-making, such as within Alberta Health Services in Alberta, Canada. This latter organization requested this search and review to inform the contents of a patient engagement resource kit for patients, providers and leaders. METHODS: Search terms related to ‘patient engagement’, tools, guides, education and infrastructure or resources, were applied to published literature databases and grey literature search engines. Grey literature also included United States, Australia and Europe where most known public engagement practices exist, and Canada as the location for this study. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set, and include: English documents referencing ‘patient engagement’ with specific criteria, and published between 1995 and 2011. For document analysis and synthesis, document analysis worksheets were used by three reviewers for the selected 224 published and 193 grey literature documents. Inter-rater reliability was ensured for the final reviews and syntheses of 76 published and 193 grey documents. RESULTS: Seven key themes emerged from the literature synthesis analysis, and were identified for patient, provider and/or leader groups. Articles/items within each theme were clustered under main topic areas of ‘tools’, ‘education’ and ‘infrastructure’. The synthesis and findings in the literature include 15 different terms and definitions for ‘patient engagement’, 17 different engagement models, numerous barriers and benefits, and 34 toolkits for various patient engagement and evaluation initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: Patient engagement is very complex. This scoping review for patient/family engagement tools and guides is a good start for a resource inventory and can guide the content development of a patient engagement resource kit to be used by patients/families, healthcare providers and administrators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4005635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40056352014-05-01 ‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review Kovacs Burns, Katharina Bellows, Mandy Eigenseher, Carol Gallivan, Jennifer BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Extensive literature exists on public involvement or engagement, but what actual tools or guides exist that are practical, tested and easy to use specifically for initiating and implementing patient and family engagement, is uncertain. No comprehensive review and synthesis of general international published or grey literature on this specific topic was found. A systematic scoping review of published and grey literature is, therefore, appropriate for searching through the vast general engagement literature to identify ‘patient/family engagement’ tools and guides applicable in health organization decision-making, such as within Alberta Health Services in Alberta, Canada. This latter organization requested this search and review to inform the contents of a patient engagement resource kit for patients, providers and leaders. METHODS: Search terms related to ‘patient engagement’, tools, guides, education and infrastructure or resources, were applied to published literature databases and grey literature search engines. Grey literature also included United States, Australia and Europe where most known public engagement practices exist, and Canada as the location for this study. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set, and include: English documents referencing ‘patient engagement’ with specific criteria, and published between 1995 and 2011. For document analysis and synthesis, document analysis worksheets were used by three reviewers for the selected 224 published and 193 grey literature documents. Inter-rater reliability was ensured for the final reviews and syntheses of 76 published and 193 grey documents. RESULTS: Seven key themes emerged from the literature synthesis analysis, and were identified for patient, provider and/or leader groups. Articles/items within each theme were clustered under main topic areas of ‘tools’, ‘education’ and ‘infrastructure’. The synthesis and findings in the literature include 15 different terms and definitions for ‘patient engagement’, 17 different engagement models, numerous barriers and benefits, and 34 toolkits for various patient engagement and evaluation initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: Patient engagement is very complex. This scoping review for patient/family engagement tools and guides is a good start for a resource inventory and can guide the content development of a patient engagement resource kit to be used by patients/families, healthcare providers and administrators. BioMed Central 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4005635/ /pubmed/24735787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-175 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kovacs Burns et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kovacs Burns, Katharina
Bellows, Mandy
Eigenseher, Carol
Gallivan, Jennifer
‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review
title ‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review
title_full ‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review
title_fullStr ‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed ‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review
title_short ‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review
title_sort ‘practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4005635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24735787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-175
work_keys_str_mv AT kovacsburnskatharina practicalresourcestosupportpatientandfamilyengagementinhealthcaredecisionsascopingreview
AT bellowsmandy practicalresourcestosupportpatientandfamilyengagementinhealthcaredecisionsascopingreview
AT eigensehercarol practicalresourcestosupportpatientandfamilyengagementinhealthcaredecisionsascopingreview
AT gallivanjennifer practicalresourcestosupportpatientandfamilyengagementinhealthcaredecisionsascopingreview