Cargando…

Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?

The central importance of angiogenesis and our understanding of how new blood vessels are formed have led to the development of novel antiangiogenic therapies. Although the number of agents in development has grown exponentially, only one phase III trial in breast cancer has been completed. In that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Miller, Kathy D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC400679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15084233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr782
_version_ 1782121363659554816
author Miller, Kathy D
author_facet Miller, Kathy D
author_sort Miller, Kathy D
collection PubMed
description The central importance of angiogenesis and our understanding of how new blood vessels are formed have led to the development of novel antiangiogenic therapies. Although the number of agents in development has grown exponentially, only one phase III trial in breast cancer has been completed. In that study the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine did not extend the progression-free survival of patients with refractory disease as compared with capecitabine monotherapy. Early enthusiasm for antiangiogenic therapy must give way to clinical reality. Our challenge now is to exploit better the activity of antiangiogenic agents seen in the early clinical studies.
format Text
id pubmed-400679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-4006792004-05-01 Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? Miller, Kathy D Breast Cancer Res Commentary The central importance of angiogenesis and our understanding of how new blood vessels are formed have led to the development of novel antiangiogenic therapies. Although the number of agents in development has grown exponentially, only one phase III trial in breast cancer has been completed. In that study the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine did not extend the progression-free survival of patients with refractory disease as compared with capecitabine monotherapy. Early enthusiasm for antiangiogenic therapy must give way to clinical reality. Our challenge now is to exploit better the activity of antiangiogenic agents seen in the early clinical studies. BioMed Central 2004 2004-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC400679/ /pubmed/15084233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr782 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Miller, Kathy D
Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?
title Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?
title_full Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?
title_fullStr Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?
title_full_unstemmed Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?
title_short Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?
title_sort recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC400679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15084233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr782
work_keys_str_mv AT millerkathyd recenttranslationalresearchantiangiogenictherapyforbreastcancerwheredowestand