Cargando…
Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand?
The central importance of angiogenesis and our understanding of how new blood vessels are formed have led to the development of novel antiangiogenic therapies. Although the number of agents in development has grown exponentially, only one phase III trial in breast cancer has been completed. In that...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC400679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15084233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr782 |
_version_ | 1782121363659554816 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Kathy D |
author_facet | Miller, Kathy D |
author_sort | Miller, Kathy D |
collection | PubMed |
description | The central importance of angiogenesis and our understanding of how new blood vessels are formed have led to the development of novel antiangiogenic therapies. Although the number of agents in development has grown exponentially, only one phase III trial in breast cancer has been completed. In that study the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine did not extend the progression-free survival of patients with refractory disease as compared with capecitabine monotherapy. Early enthusiasm for antiangiogenic therapy must give way to clinical reality. Our challenge now is to exploit better the activity of antiangiogenic agents seen in the early clinical studies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-400679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4006792004-05-01 Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? Miller, Kathy D Breast Cancer Res Commentary The central importance of angiogenesis and our understanding of how new blood vessels are formed have led to the development of novel antiangiogenic therapies. Although the number of agents in development has grown exponentially, only one phase III trial in breast cancer has been completed. In that study the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine did not extend the progression-free survival of patients with refractory disease as compared with capecitabine monotherapy. Early enthusiasm for antiangiogenic therapy must give way to clinical reality. Our challenge now is to exploit better the activity of antiangiogenic agents seen in the early clinical studies. BioMed Central 2004 2004-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC400679/ /pubmed/15084233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr782 Text en Copyright © 2004 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Miller, Kathy D Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? |
title | Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? |
title_full | Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? |
title_fullStr | Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? |
title_full_unstemmed | Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? |
title_short | Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? |
title_sort | recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer – where do we stand? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC400679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15084233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerkathyd recenttranslationalresearchantiangiogenictherapyforbreastcancerwheredowestand |