Cargando…

The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that the course of low back pain (LBP) symptoms in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) follows a pattern of large improvement regardless of the type of treatment. A similar pattern was independently observed in observational studies. However, there is an assumption that t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Artus, Majid, van der Windt, Danielle, Jordan, Kelvin P, Croft, Peter R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4007531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24607083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-68
_version_ 1782314343101104128
author Artus, Majid
van der Windt, Danielle
Jordan, Kelvin P
Croft, Peter R
author_facet Artus, Majid
van der Windt, Danielle
Jordan, Kelvin P
Croft, Peter R
author_sort Artus, Majid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that the course of low back pain (LBP) symptoms in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) follows a pattern of large improvement regardless of the type of treatment. A similar pattern was independently observed in observational studies. However, there is an assumption that the clinical course of symptoms is particularly influenced in RCTs by mere participation in the trials. To test this assumption, the aim of our study was to compare the course of LBP in RCTs and observational studies. METHODS: Source of studies CENTRAL database for RCTs and MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and hand search of systematic reviews for cohort studies. Studies include individuals aged 18 or over, and concern non-specific LBP. Trials had to concern primary care treatments. Data were extracted on pain intensity. Meta-regression analysis was used to compare the pooled within-group change in pain in RCTs with that in cohort studies calculated as the standardised mean change (SMC). RESULTS: 70 RCTs and 19 cohort studies were included, out of 1134 and 653 identified respectively. LBP symptoms followed a similar course in RCTs and cohort studies: a rapid improvement in the first 6 weeks followed by a smaller further improvement until 52 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference in pooled SMC between RCTs and cohort studies at any time point:- 6 weeks: RCTs: SMC 1.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.0) and cohorts 1.2 (0.7to 1.7); 13 weeks: RCTs 1.2 (1.1 to 1.3) and cohorts 1.0 (0.8 to 1.3); 27 weeks: RCTs 1.1 (1.0 to 1.2) and cohorts 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7); 52 weeks: RCTs 0.9 (0.8 to 1.0) and cohorts 1.1 (0.8 to 1.6). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of LBP symptoms followed a pattern that was similar in RCTs and cohort observational studies. In addition to a shared ‘natural history’, enrolment of LBP patients in clinical studies is likely to provoke responses that reflect the nonspecific effects of seeking and receiving care, independent of the study design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4007531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40075312014-05-19 The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies Artus, Majid van der Windt, Danielle Jordan, Kelvin P Croft, Peter R BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that the course of low back pain (LBP) symptoms in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) follows a pattern of large improvement regardless of the type of treatment. A similar pattern was independently observed in observational studies. However, there is an assumption that the clinical course of symptoms is particularly influenced in RCTs by mere participation in the trials. To test this assumption, the aim of our study was to compare the course of LBP in RCTs and observational studies. METHODS: Source of studies CENTRAL database for RCTs and MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and hand search of systematic reviews for cohort studies. Studies include individuals aged 18 or over, and concern non-specific LBP. Trials had to concern primary care treatments. Data were extracted on pain intensity. Meta-regression analysis was used to compare the pooled within-group change in pain in RCTs with that in cohort studies calculated as the standardised mean change (SMC). RESULTS: 70 RCTs and 19 cohort studies were included, out of 1134 and 653 identified respectively. LBP symptoms followed a similar course in RCTs and cohort studies: a rapid improvement in the first 6 weeks followed by a smaller further improvement until 52 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference in pooled SMC between RCTs and cohort studies at any time point:- 6 weeks: RCTs: SMC 1.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.0) and cohorts 1.2 (0.7to 1.7); 13 weeks: RCTs 1.2 (1.1 to 1.3) and cohorts 1.0 (0.8 to 1.3); 27 weeks: RCTs 1.1 (1.0 to 1.2) and cohorts 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7); 52 weeks: RCTs 0.9 (0.8 to 1.0) and cohorts 1.1 (0.8 to 1.6). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of LBP symptoms followed a pattern that was similar in RCTs and cohort observational studies. In addition to a shared ‘natural history’, enrolment of LBP patients in clinical studies is likely to provoke responses that reflect the nonspecific effects of seeking and receiving care, independent of the study design. BioMed Central 2014-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4007531/ /pubmed/24607083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-68 Text en Copyright © 2014 Artus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Artus, Majid
van der Windt, Danielle
Jordan, Kelvin P
Croft, Peter R
The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies
title The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies
title_full The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies
title_fullStr The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies
title_full_unstemmed The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies
title_short The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies
title_sort clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (rcts) and observational studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4007531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24607083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-68
work_keys_str_mv AT artusmajid theclinicalcourseoflowbackpainametaanalysiscomparingoutcomesinrandomisedclinicaltrialsrctsandobservationalstudies
AT vanderwindtdanielle theclinicalcourseoflowbackpainametaanalysiscomparingoutcomesinrandomisedclinicaltrialsrctsandobservationalstudies
AT jordankelvinp theclinicalcourseoflowbackpainametaanalysiscomparingoutcomesinrandomisedclinicaltrialsrctsandobservationalstudies
AT croftpeterr theclinicalcourseoflowbackpainametaanalysiscomparingoutcomesinrandomisedclinicaltrialsrctsandobservationalstudies
AT artusmajid clinicalcourseoflowbackpainametaanalysiscomparingoutcomesinrandomisedclinicaltrialsrctsandobservationalstudies
AT vanderwindtdanielle clinicalcourseoflowbackpainametaanalysiscomparingoutcomesinrandomisedclinicaltrialsrctsandobservationalstudies
AT jordankelvinp clinicalcourseoflowbackpainametaanalysiscomparingoutcomesinrandomisedclinicaltrialsrctsandobservationalstudies
AT croftpeterr clinicalcourseoflowbackpainametaanalysiscomparingoutcomesinrandomisedclinicaltrialsrctsandobservationalstudies