Cargando…

Comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction:  Basal–bolus intensive insulin therapy has been believed to achieve best the glycemic control, but is also complicated as a result of the number of injections required and the type of insulin. This study compared the effect of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 (prandial premixed therapy [...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamashiro, Keiko, Ikeda, Fuki, Fujitani, Yoshio, Watada, Hirotaka, Kawamori, Ryuzo, Hirose, Takahisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00025.x
_version_ 1782314385900830720
author Yamashiro, Keiko
Ikeda, Fuki
Fujitani, Yoshio
Watada, Hirotaka
Kawamori, Ryuzo
Hirose, Takahisa
author_facet Yamashiro, Keiko
Ikeda, Fuki
Fujitani, Yoshio
Watada, Hirotaka
Kawamori, Ryuzo
Hirose, Takahisa
author_sort Yamashiro, Keiko
collection PubMed
description Aims/Introduction:  Basal–bolus intensive insulin therapy has been believed to achieve best the glycemic control, but is also complicated as a result of the number of injections required and the type of insulin. This study compared the effect of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 (prandial premixed therapy [PPT]) with thrice daily lispro given in combination with sulfonylureas (prandial bolus therapy with sulfonylurea [PBTS]) as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods:  This 24‐week, observational, parallel trial comprised a 12‐week screening period and a 24‐week intervention period for 31 diabetes patients who were poorly controlled with submaximal sulfonylurea. At the start of the intervention period, we commenced thrice‐daily insulin injections and divided the 31 patients into either lispro 50/50 with discontinuation of sulfonylurea (PPT, n = 15) or lispro added to sulfonylurea (PBTS, n = 16). The same dose‐adjustment algorithm was used for analyzing both groups; HbA(1c), plasma glucose, insulin daily dose, bodyweight and number of hypoglycemic episodes were evaluated. Results:  At the end of the study, HbA(1c) was significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.00001), but no difference was apparent between the groups. The daily doses of PPT were more than those of PBTS, albeit the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.051). There were significantly fewer hypoglycemic episodes encountered with PPT than with PBTS. Conclusions:  Thrice‐daily injections of lispro 50/50 provide an effective and safe regimen as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00025.x, 2010)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4008007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40080072014-05-19 Comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes Yamashiro, Keiko Ikeda, Fuki Fujitani, Yoshio Watada, Hirotaka Kawamori, Ryuzo Hirose, Takahisa J Diabetes Investig Articles Aims/Introduction:  Basal–bolus intensive insulin therapy has been believed to achieve best the glycemic control, but is also complicated as a result of the number of injections required and the type of insulin. This study compared the effect of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 (prandial premixed therapy [PPT]) with thrice daily lispro given in combination with sulfonylureas (prandial bolus therapy with sulfonylurea [PBTS]) as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods:  This 24‐week, observational, parallel trial comprised a 12‐week screening period and a 24‐week intervention period for 31 diabetes patients who were poorly controlled with submaximal sulfonylurea. At the start of the intervention period, we commenced thrice‐daily insulin injections and divided the 31 patients into either lispro 50/50 with discontinuation of sulfonylurea (PPT, n = 15) or lispro added to sulfonylurea (PBTS, n = 16). The same dose‐adjustment algorithm was used for analyzing both groups; HbA(1c), plasma glucose, insulin daily dose, bodyweight and number of hypoglycemic episodes were evaluated. Results:  At the end of the study, HbA(1c) was significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.00001), but no difference was apparent between the groups. The daily doses of PPT were more than those of PBTS, albeit the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.051). There were significantly fewer hypoglycemic episodes encountered with PPT than with PBTS. Conclusions:  Thrice‐daily injections of lispro 50/50 provide an effective and safe regimen as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00025.x, 2010) Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-04-28 2010-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4008007/ /pubmed/24843424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00025.x Text en © 2010 Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
spellingShingle Articles
Yamashiro, Keiko
Ikeda, Fuki
Fujitani, Yoshio
Watada, Hirotaka
Kawamori, Ryuzo
Hirose, Takahisa
Comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes
title Comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_full Comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_short Comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes
title_sort comparison of thrice‐daily lispro 50/50 vs thrice‐daily lispro in combination with sulfonylurea as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00025.x
work_keys_str_mv AT yamashirokeiko comparisonofthricedailylispro5050vsthricedailylisproincombinationwithsulfonylureaasinitialinsulintherapyfortype2diabetes
AT ikedafuki comparisonofthricedailylispro5050vsthricedailylisproincombinationwithsulfonylureaasinitialinsulintherapyfortype2diabetes
AT fujitaniyoshio comparisonofthricedailylispro5050vsthricedailylisproincombinationwithsulfonylureaasinitialinsulintherapyfortype2diabetes
AT watadahirotaka comparisonofthricedailylispro5050vsthricedailylisproincombinationwithsulfonylureaasinitialinsulintherapyfortype2diabetes
AT kawamoriryuzo comparisonofthricedailylispro5050vsthricedailylisproincombinationwithsulfonylureaasinitialinsulintherapyfortype2diabetes
AT hirosetakahisa comparisonofthricedailylispro5050vsthricedailylisproincombinationwithsulfonylureaasinitialinsulintherapyfortype2diabetes