Cargando…

Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens

BACKGROUND: NanoString’s Prosigna™ Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay is based on the PAM50 gene expression signature. The test outputs a risk of recurrence (ROR) score, risk category, and intrinsic subtype (Luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like). The studies described here were designed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Torsten, Wallden, Brett, Schaper, Carl, Ferree, Sean, Liu, Shuzhen, Gao, Dongxia, Barry, Garrett, Dowidar, Naeem, Maysuria, Malini, Storhoff, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24625003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-177
_version_ 1782314423221747712
author Nielsen, Torsten
Wallden, Brett
Schaper, Carl
Ferree, Sean
Liu, Shuzhen
Gao, Dongxia
Barry, Garrett
Dowidar, Naeem
Maysuria, Malini
Storhoff, James
author_facet Nielsen, Torsten
Wallden, Brett
Schaper, Carl
Ferree, Sean
Liu, Shuzhen
Gao, Dongxia
Barry, Garrett
Dowidar, Naeem
Maysuria, Malini
Storhoff, James
author_sort Nielsen, Torsten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: NanoString’s Prosigna™ Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay is based on the PAM50 gene expression signature. The test outputs a risk of recurrence (ROR) score, risk category, and intrinsic subtype (Luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like). The studies described here were designed to validate the analytical performance of the test on the nCounter Analysis System across multiple laboratories. METHODS: Analytical precision was measured by testing five breast tumor RNA samples across 3 sites. Reproducibility was measured by testing replicate tissue sections from 43 FFPE breast tumor blocks across 3 sites following independent pathology review at each site. The RNA input range was validated by comparing assay results at the extremes of the specified range to the nominal RNA input level. Interference was evaluated by including non-tumor tissue into the test. RESULTS: The measured standard deviation (SD) was less than 1 ROR unit within the analytical precision study and the measured total SD was 2.9 ROR units within the reproducibility study. The ROR scores for RNA inputs at the extremes of the range were the same as those at the nominal input level. Assay results were stable in the presence of moderate amounts of surrounding non-tumor tissue (<70% by area). CONCLUSIONS: The analytical performance of NanoString’s Prosigna assay has been validated using FFPE breast tumor specimens across multiple clinical testing laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4008304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40083042014-05-19 Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens Nielsen, Torsten Wallden, Brett Schaper, Carl Ferree, Sean Liu, Shuzhen Gao, Dongxia Barry, Garrett Dowidar, Naeem Maysuria, Malini Storhoff, James BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: NanoString’s Prosigna™ Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay is based on the PAM50 gene expression signature. The test outputs a risk of recurrence (ROR) score, risk category, and intrinsic subtype (Luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like). The studies described here were designed to validate the analytical performance of the test on the nCounter Analysis System across multiple laboratories. METHODS: Analytical precision was measured by testing five breast tumor RNA samples across 3 sites. Reproducibility was measured by testing replicate tissue sections from 43 FFPE breast tumor blocks across 3 sites following independent pathology review at each site. The RNA input range was validated by comparing assay results at the extremes of the specified range to the nominal RNA input level. Interference was evaluated by including non-tumor tissue into the test. RESULTS: The measured standard deviation (SD) was less than 1 ROR unit within the analytical precision study and the measured total SD was 2.9 ROR units within the reproducibility study. The ROR scores for RNA inputs at the extremes of the range were the same as those at the nominal input level. Assay results were stable in the presence of moderate amounts of surrounding non-tumor tissue (<70% by area). CONCLUSIONS: The analytical performance of NanoString’s Prosigna assay has been validated using FFPE breast tumor specimens across multiple clinical testing laboratories. BioMed Central 2014-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4008304/ /pubmed/24625003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-177 Text en Copyright © 2014 Nielsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Nielsen, Torsten
Wallden, Brett
Schaper, Carl
Ferree, Sean
Liu, Shuzhen
Gao, Dongxia
Barry, Garrett
Dowidar, Naeem
Maysuria, Malini
Storhoff, James
Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
title Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
title_full Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
title_fullStr Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
title_full_unstemmed Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
title_short Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
title_sort analytical validation of the pam50-based prosigna breast cancer prognostic gene signature assay and ncounter analysis system using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24625003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-177
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsentorsten analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT walldenbrett analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT schapercarl analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT ferreesean analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT liushuzhen analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT gaodongxia analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT barrygarrett analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT dowidarnaeem analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT maysuriamalini analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens
AT storhoffjames analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens