Cargando…
Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens
BACKGROUND: NanoString’s Prosigna™ Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay is based on the PAM50 gene expression signature. The test outputs a risk of recurrence (ROR) score, risk category, and intrinsic subtype (Luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like). The studies described here were designed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24625003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-177 |
_version_ | 1782314423221747712 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Torsten Wallden, Brett Schaper, Carl Ferree, Sean Liu, Shuzhen Gao, Dongxia Barry, Garrett Dowidar, Naeem Maysuria, Malini Storhoff, James |
author_facet | Nielsen, Torsten Wallden, Brett Schaper, Carl Ferree, Sean Liu, Shuzhen Gao, Dongxia Barry, Garrett Dowidar, Naeem Maysuria, Malini Storhoff, James |
author_sort | Nielsen, Torsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: NanoString’s Prosigna™ Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay is based on the PAM50 gene expression signature. The test outputs a risk of recurrence (ROR) score, risk category, and intrinsic subtype (Luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like). The studies described here were designed to validate the analytical performance of the test on the nCounter Analysis System across multiple laboratories. METHODS: Analytical precision was measured by testing five breast tumor RNA samples across 3 sites. Reproducibility was measured by testing replicate tissue sections from 43 FFPE breast tumor blocks across 3 sites following independent pathology review at each site. The RNA input range was validated by comparing assay results at the extremes of the specified range to the nominal RNA input level. Interference was evaluated by including non-tumor tissue into the test. RESULTS: The measured standard deviation (SD) was less than 1 ROR unit within the analytical precision study and the measured total SD was 2.9 ROR units within the reproducibility study. The ROR scores for RNA inputs at the extremes of the range were the same as those at the nominal input level. Assay results were stable in the presence of moderate amounts of surrounding non-tumor tissue (<70% by area). CONCLUSIONS: The analytical performance of NanoString’s Prosigna assay has been validated using FFPE breast tumor specimens across multiple clinical testing laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4008304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40083042014-05-19 Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens Nielsen, Torsten Wallden, Brett Schaper, Carl Ferree, Sean Liu, Shuzhen Gao, Dongxia Barry, Garrett Dowidar, Naeem Maysuria, Malini Storhoff, James BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: NanoString’s Prosigna™ Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay is based on the PAM50 gene expression signature. The test outputs a risk of recurrence (ROR) score, risk category, and intrinsic subtype (Luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like). The studies described here were designed to validate the analytical performance of the test on the nCounter Analysis System across multiple laboratories. METHODS: Analytical precision was measured by testing five breast tumor RNA samples across 3 sites. Reproducibility was measured by testing replicate tissue sections from 43 FFPE breast tumor blocks across 3 sites following independent pathology review at each site. The RNA input range was validated by comparing assay results at the extremes of the specified range to the nominal RNA input level. Interference was evaluated by including non-tumor tissue into the test. RESULTS: The measured standard deviation (SD) was less than 1 ROR unit within the analytical precision study and the measured total SD was 2.9 ROR units within the reproducibility study. The ROR scores for RNA inputs at the extremes of the range were the same as those at the nominal input level. Assay results were stable in the presence of moderate amounts of surrounding non-tumor tissue (<70% by area). CONCLUSIONS: The analytical performance of NanoString’s Prosigna assay has been validated using FFPE breast tumor specimens across multiple clinical testing laboratories. BioMed Central 2014-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4008304/ /pubmed/24625003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-177 Text en Copyright © 2014 Nielsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Nielsen, Torsten Wallden, Brett Schaper, Carl Ferree, Sean Liu, Shuzhen Gao, Dongxia Barry, Garrett Dowidar, Naeem Maysuria, Malini Storhoff, James Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens |
title | Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens |
title_full | Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens |
title_fullStr | Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens |
title_short | Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens |
title_sort | analytical validation of the pam50-based prosigna breast cancer prognostic gene signature assay and ncounter analysis system using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24625003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nielsentorsten analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT walldenbrett analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT schapercarl analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT ferreesean analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT liushuzhen analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT gaodongxia analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT barrygarrett analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT dowidarnaeem analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT maysuriamalini analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens AT storhoffjames analyticalvalidationofthepam50basedprosignabreastcancerprognosticgenesignatureassayandncounteranalysissystemusingformalinfixedparaffinembeddedbreasttumorspecimens |