Cargando…

Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) was designed to address issues identified with traditional methods of selection. This study aims to examine the predictive validity of the UKCAT and compare this to traditional selection methods in the senior years of medical school. This was a follo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Husbands, Adrian, Mathieson, Alistair, Dowell, Jonathan, Cleland, Jennifer, MacKenzie, Rhoda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24762134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-88
_version_ 1782314435695607808
author Husbands, Adrian
Mathieson, Alistair
Dowell, Jonathan
Cleland, Jennifer
MacKenzie, Rhoda
author_facet Husbands, Adrian
Mathieson, Alistair
Dowell, Jonathan
Cleland, Jennifer
MacKenzie, Rhoda
author_sort Husbands, Adrian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) was designed to address issues identified with traditional methods of selection. This study aims to examine the predictive validity of the UKCAT and compare this to traditional selection methods in the senior years of medical school. This was a follow-up study of two cohorts of students from two medical schools who had previously taken part in a study examining the predictive validity of the UKCAT in first year. METHODS: The sample consisted of 4(th) and 5(th) Year students who commenced their studies at the University of Aberdeen or University of Dundee medical schools in 2007. Data collected were: demographics (gender and age group), UKCAT scores; Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) form scores; admission interview scores; Year 4 and 5 degree examination scores. Pearson’s correlations were used to examine the relationships between admissions variables, examination scores, gender and age group, and to select variables for multiple linear regression analysis to predict examination scores. RESULTS: Ninety-nine and 89 students at Aberdeen medical school from Years 4 and 5 respectively, and 51 Year 4 students in Dundee, were included in the analysis. Neither UCAS form nor interview scores were statistically significant predictors of examination performance. Conversely, the UKCAT yielded statistically significant validity coefficients between .24 and .36 in four of five assessments investigated. Multiple regression analysis showed the UKCAT made a statistically significant unique contribution to variance in examination performance in the senior years. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the UKCAT appears to predict performance better in the later years of medical school compared to earlier years and provides modest supportive evidence for the UKCAT’s role in student selection within these institutions. Further research is needed to assess the predictive validity of the UKCAT against professional and behavioural outcomes as the cohort commences working life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4008381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40083812014-05-03 Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study Husbands, Adrian Mathieson, Alistair Dowell, Jonathan Cleland, Jennifer MacKenzie, Rhoda BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) was designed to address issues identified with traditional methods of selection. This study aims to examine the predictive validity of the UKCAT and compare this to traditional selection methods in the senior years of medical school. This was a follow-up study of two cohorts of students from two medical schools who had previously taken part in a study examining the predictive validity of the UKCAT in first year. METHODS: The sample consisted of 4(th) and 5(th) Year students who commenced their studies at the University of Aberdeen or University of Dundee medical schools in 2007. Data collected were: demographics (gender and age group), UKCAT scores; Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) form scores; admission interview scores; Year 4 and 5 degree examination scores. Pearson’s correlations were used to examine the relationships between admissions variables, examination scores, gender and age group, and to select variables for multiple linear regression analysis to predict examination scores. RESULTS: Ninety-nine and 89 students at Aberdeen medical school from Years 4 and 5 respectively, and 51 Year 4 students in Dundee, were included in the analysis. Neither UCAS form nor interview scores were statistically significant predictors of examination performance. Conversely, the UKCAT yielded statistically significant validity coefficients between .24 and .36 in four of five assessments investigated. Multiple regression analysis showed the UKCAT made a statistically significant unique contribution to variance in examination performance in the senior years. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the UKCAT appears to predict performance better in the later years of medical school compared to earlier years and provides modest supportive evidence for the UKCAT’s role in student selection within these institutions. Further research is needed to assess the predictive validity of the UKCAT against professional and behavioural outcomes as the cohort commences working life. BioMed Central 2014-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4008381/ /pubmed/24762134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-88 Text en Copyright © 2014 Husbands et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Husbands, Adrian
Mathieson, Alistair
Dowell, Jonathan
Cleland, Jennifer
MacKenzie, Rhoda
Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study
title Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study
title_full Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study
title_short Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study
title_sort predictive validity of the uk clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24762134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-88
work_keys_str_mv AT husbandsadrian predictivevalidityoftheukclinicalaptitudetestinthefinalyearsofmedicalschoolaprospectivecohortstudy
AT mathiesonalistair predictivevalidityoftheukclinicalaptitudetestinthefinalyearsofmedicalschoolaprospectivecohortstudy
AT dowelljonathan predictivevalidityoftheukclinicalaptitudetestinthefinalyearsofmedicalschoolaprospectivecohortstudy
AT clelandjennifer predictivevalidityoftheukclinicalaptitudetestinthefinalyearsofmedicalschoolaprospectivecohortstudy
AT mackenzierhoda predictivevalidityoftheukclinicalaptitudetestinthefinalyearsofmedicalschoolaprospectivecohortstudy