Cargando…
Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of the titanium mesh cage (TMC) and the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cage (n-HA/PA66 cage) for 1- or 2-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: A total of 117 consec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24789144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096265 |
_version_ | 1782314461830316032 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yuan Quan, Zhengxue Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji Tang, Ke Li, Jie Zhou, Xu Jiang, Dianming |
author_facet | Zhang, Yuan Quan, Zhengxue Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji Tang, Ke Li, Jie Zhou, Xu Jiang, Dianming |
author_sort | Zhang, Yuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of the titanium mesh cage (TMC) and the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cage (n-HA/PA66 cage) for 1- or 2-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: A total of 117 consecutive patients with MCSM who underwent 1- or 2-level ACCF using a TMC or an n-HA/PA66 cage were studied retrospectively at a mean follow-up of 45.28±12.83 months. The patients were divided into four groups according to the level of corpectomy (1- or 2-level corpectomy) and cage type used (TMC or n-HA/PA66 cage). Clinical and radiological parameters were used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: At the one-year follow-up, the fusion rate in the n-HA/PA66 group was higher, albeit non-significantly, than that in the TMC group for both 1- and 2-level ACCF, but the fusion rates of the procedures were almost equal at the final follow-up. The incidence of cage subsidence at the final follow-up was significantly higher in the TMC group than in the n-HA/PA66 group for the 1-level ACCF (24% vs. 4%, p = 0.01), and the difference was greater for the 2-level ACCF between the TMC group and the n-HA/PA66 group (38% vs. 5%, p = 0.01). Meanwhile, a much greater loss of fused height was observed in the TMC group compared with the n-HA/PA66 group for both the 1- and 2-level ACCF. All four groups demonstrated increases in C2-C7 Cobb angle and JOA scores and decreases in VAS at the final follow-up compared with preoperative values. CONCLUSION: The lower incidence of cage subsidence, better maintenance of the height of the fused segment and similar excellent bony fusion indicate that the n-HA/PA66 cage may be a superior alternative to the TMC for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy, in particular for 2-level ACCF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4008500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40085002014-05-09 Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients Zhang, Yuan Quan, Zhengxue Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji Tang, Ke Li, Jie Zhou, Xu Jiang, Dianming PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of the titanium mesh cage (TMC) and the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cage (n-HA/PA66 cage) for 1- or 2-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: A total of 117 consecutive patients with MCSM who underwent 1- or 2-level ACCF using a TMC or an n-HA/PA66 cage were studied retrospectively at a mean follow-up of 45.28±12.83 months. The patients were divided into four groups according to the level of corpectomy (1- or 2-level corpectomy) and cage type used (TMC or n-HA/PA66 cage). Clinical and radiological parameters were used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: At the one-year follow-up, the fusion rate in the n-HA/PA66 group was higher, albeit non-significantly, than that in the TMC group for both 1- and 2-level ACCF, but the fusion rates of the procedures were almost equal at the final follow-up. The incidence of cage subsidence at the final follow-up was significantly higher in the TMC group than in the n-HA/PA66 group for the 1-level ACCF (24% vs. 4%, p = 0.01), and the difference was greater for the 2-level ACCF between the TMC group and the n-HA/PA66 group (38% vs. 5%, p = 0.01). Meanwhile, a much greater loss of fused height was observed in the TMC group compared with the n-HA/PA66 group for both the 1- and 2-level ACCF. All four groups demonstrated increases in C2-C7 Cobb angle and JOA scores and decreases in VAS at the final follow-up compared with preoperative values. CONCLUSION: The lower incidence of cage subsidence, better maintenance of the height of the fused segment and similar excellent bony fusion indicate that the n-HA/PA66 cage may be a superior alternative to the TMC for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy, in particular for 2-level ACCF. Public Library of Science 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4008500/ /pubmed/24789144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096265 Text en © 2014 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Yuan Quan, Zhengxue Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji Tang, Ke Li, Jie Zhou, Xu Jiang, Dianming Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients |
title | Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients |
title_full | Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients |
title_short | Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients |
title_sort | evaluation of anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cages after 1- or 2-level corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study of 117 patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24789144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyuan evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients AT quanzhengxue evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients AT zhaozenghui evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients AT luoxiaoji evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients AT tangke evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients AT lijie evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients AT zhouxu evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients AT jiangdianming evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients |