Cargando…

Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of the titanium mesh cage (TMC) and the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cage (n-HA/PA66 cage) for 1- or 2-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: A total of 117 consec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yuan, Quan, Zhengxue, Zhao, Zenghui, Luo, Xiaoji, Tang, Ke, Li, Jie, Zhou, Xu, Jiang, Dianming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24789144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096265
_version_ 1782314461830316032
author Zhang, Yuan
Quan, Zhengxue
Zhao, Zenghui
Luo, Xiaoji
Tang, Ke
Li, Jie
Zhou, Xu
Jiang, Dianming
author_facet Zhang, Yuan
Quan, Zhengxue
Zhao, Zenghui
Luo, Xiaoji
Tang, Ke
Li, Jie
Zhou, Xu
Jiang, Dianming
author_sort Zhang, Yuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of the titanium mesh cage (TMC) and the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cage (n-HA/PA66 cage) for 1- or 2-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: A total of 117 consecutive patients with MCSM who underwent 1- or 2-level ACCF using a TMC or an n-HA/PA66 cage were studied retrospectively at a mean follow-up of 45.28±12.83 months. The patients were divided into four groups according to the level of corpectomy (1- or 2-level corpectomy) and cage type used (TMC or n-HA/PA66 cage). Clinical and radiological parameters were used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: At the one-year follow-up, the fusion rate in the n-HA/PA66 group was higher, albeit non-significantly, than that in the TMC group for both 1- and 2-level ACCF, but the fusion rates of the procedures were almost equal at the final follow-up. The incidence of cage subsidence at the final follow-up was significantly higher in the TMC group than in the n-HA/PA66 group for the 1-level ACCF (24% vs. 4%, p = 0.01), and the difference was greater for the 2-level ACCF between the TMC group and the n-HA/PA66 group (38% vs. 5%, p = 0.01). Meanwhile, a much greater loss of fused height was observed in the TMC group compared with the n-HA/PA66 group for both the 1- and 2-level ACCF. All four groups demonstrated increases in C2-C7 Cobb angle and JOA scores and decreases in VAS at the final follow-up compared with preoperative values. CONCLUSION: The lower incidence of cage subsidence, better maintenance of the height of the fused segment and similar excellent bony fusion indicate that the n-HA/PA66 cage may be a superior alternative to the TMC for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy, in particular for 2-level ACCF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4008500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40085002014-05-09 Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients Zhang, Yuan Quan, Zhengxue Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji Tang, Ke Li, Jie Zhou, Xu Jiang, Dianming PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of the titanium mesh cage (TMC) and the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cage (n-HA/PA66 cage) for 1- or 2-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: A total of 117 consecutive patients with MCSM who underwent 1- or 2-level ACCF using a TMC or an n-HA/PA66 cage were studied retrospectively at a mean follow-up of 45.28±12.83 months. The patients were divided into four groups according to the level of corpectomy (1- or 2-level corpectomy) and cage type used (TMC or n-HA/PA66 cage). Clinical and radiological parameters were used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: At the one-year follow-up, the fusion rate in the n-HA/PA66 group was higher, albeit non-significantly, than that in the TMC group for both 1- and 2-level ACCF, but the fusion rates of the procedures were almost equal at the final follow-up. The incidence of cage subsidence at the final follow-up was significantly higher in the TMC group than in the n-HA/PA66 group for the 1-level ACCF (24% vs. 4%, p = 0.01), and the difference was greater for the 2-level ACCF between the TMC group and the n-HA/PA66 group (38% vs. 5%, p = 0.01). Meanwhile, a much greater loss of fused height was observed in the TMC group compared with the n-HA/PA66 group for both the 1- and 2-level ACCF. All four groups demonstrated increases in C2-C7 Cobb angle and JOA scores and decreases in VAS at the final follow-up compared with preoperative values. CONCLUSION: The lower incidence of cage subsidence, better maintenance of the height of the fused segment and similar excellent bony fusion indicate that the n-HA/PA66 cage may be a superior alternative to the TMC for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy, in particular for 2-level ACCF. Public Library of Science 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4008500/ /pubmed/24789144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096265 Text en © 2014 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yuan
Quan, Zhengxue
Zhao, Zenghui
Luo, Xiaoji
Tang, Ke
Li, Jie
Zhou, Xu
Jiang, Dianming
Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients
title Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients
title_full Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients
title_short Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Cages versus Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Cages after 1- or 2-Level Corpectomy for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 117 Patients
title_sort evaluation of anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cages after 1- or 2-level corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study of 117 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24789144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096265
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyuan evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients
AT quanzhengxue evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients
AT zhaozenghui evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients
AT luoxiaoji evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients
AT tangke evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients
AT lijie evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients
AT zhouxu evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients
AT jiangdianming evaluationofanteriorcervicalreconstructionwithtitaniummeshcagesversusnanohydroxyapatitepolyamide66cagesafter1or2levelcorpectomyformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectivestudyof117patients