Cargando…
Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology
Food intake is a fundamental parameter in animal studies. Despite the prevalent use of Drosophila in laboratory research, precise measurements of food intake remain challenging in this model organism. Here, we compare several common Drosophila feeding assays: the Capillary Feeder (CAFE), food-labeli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24681694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2899 |
_version_ | 1782314498207514624 |
---|---|
author | Deshpande, Sonali A. Carvalho, Gil B. Amador, Ariadna Phillips, Angela M. Hoxha, Sany Lizotte, Keith J. Ja, William W. |
author_facet | Deshpande, Sonali A. Carvalho, Gil B. Amador, Ariadna Phillips, Angela M. Hoxha, Sany Lizotte, Keith J. Ja, William W. |
author_sort | Deshpande, Sonali A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Food intake is a fundamental parameter in animal studies. Despite the prevalent use of Drosophila in laboratory research, precise measurements of food intake remain challenging in this model organism. Here, we compare several common Drosophila feeding assays: the Capillary Feeder (CAFE), food-labeling with a radioactive tracer or a colorimetric dye, and observations of proboscis extension (PE). We show that the CAFE and radioisotope-labeling provide the most consistent results, have the highest sensitivity, and can resolve differences in feeding that dye-labeling and PE fail to distinguish. We conclude that performing the radiolabeling and CAFE assays in parallel is currently the best approach for quantifying Drosophila food intake. Understanding the strengths and limitations of food intake methodology will greatly advance Drosophila studies of nutrition, behavior, and disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4008671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40086712014-11-01 Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology Deshpande, Sonali A. Carvalho, Gil B. Amador, Ariadna Phillips, Angela M. Hoxha, Sany Lizotte, Keith J. Ja, William W. Nat Methods Article Food intake is a fundamental parameter in animal studies. Despite the prevalent use of Drosophila in laboratory research, precise measurements of food intake remain challenging in this model organism. Here, we compare several common Drosophila feeding assays: the Capillary Feeder (CAFE), food-labeling with a radioactive tracer or a colorimetric dye, and observations of proboscis extension (PE). We show that the CAFE and radioisotope-labeling provide the most consistent results, have the highest sensitivity, and can resolve differences in feeding that dye-labeling and PE fail to distinguish. We conclude that performing the radiolabeling and CAFE assays in parallel is currently the best approach for quantifying Drosophila food intake. Understanding the strengths and limitations of food intake methodology will greatly advance Drosophila studies of nutrition, behavior, and disease. 2014-03-30 2014-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4008671/ /pubmed/24681694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2899 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Deshpande, Sonali A. Carvalho, Gil B. Amador, Ariadna Phillips, Angela M. Hoxha, Sany Lizotte, Keith J. Ja, William W. Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology |
title | Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology |
title_full | Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology |
title_fullStr | Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology |
title_short | Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology |
title_sort | quantifying drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24681694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deshpandesonalia quantifyingdrosophilafoodintakecomparativeanalysisofcurrentmethodology AT carvalhogilb quantifyingdrosophilafoodintakecomparativeanalysisofcurrentmethodology AT amadorariadna quantifyingdrosophilafoodintakecomparativeanalysisofcurrentmethodology AT phillipsangelam quantifyingdrosophilafoodintakecomparativeanalysisofcurrentmethodology AT hoxhasany quantifyingdrosophilafoodintakecomparativeanalysisofcurrentmethodology AT lizottekeithj quantifyingdrosophilafoodintakecomparativeanalysisofcurrentmethodology AT jawilliamw quantifyingdrosophilafoodintakecomparativeanalysisofcurrentmethodology |