Cargando…

Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?

Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer is a well-established procedure supported by several well-conducted large-scale randomised controlled trials. Patients could now be conferred the benefits of the minimally invasive approach while retaining comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong, Chong, Choon-Seng, Lieske, Bettina, Tan, Ker-Kan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24822196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/347810
_version_ 1782479731026821120
author Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong
Chong, Choon-Seng
Lieske, Bettina
Tan, Ker-Kan
author_facet Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong
Chong, Choon-Seng
Lieske, Bettina
Tan, Ker-Kan
author_sort Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong
collection PubMed
description Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer is a well-established procedure supported by several well-conducted large-scale randomised controlled trials. Patients could now be conferred the benefits of the minimally invasive approach while retaining comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. However, the benefits of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer remained controversial. While the laparoscopic approach is more technically demanding, results from randomised controlled trials regarding long term oncologic outcomes are only beginning to be reported. The impacts of bladder and sexual functions following proctectomy are considerable and are important contributing factors to the patients' quality of life in the long-term. These issues present a delicate dilemma to the surgeon in his choice of operative approach in tackling rectal cancer. This is compounded further by the rapid proliferation of various laparoscopic techniques including the hand assisted, robotic assisted, and single port laparoscopy. This review article aims to draw on the significant studies which have been conducted to highlight the short- and long-term outcomes and evidence for laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4009228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40092282014-05-12 Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence? Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong Chong, Choon-Seng Lieske, Bettina Tan, Ker-Kan Biomed Res Int Review Article Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer is a well-established procedure supported by several well-conducted large-scale randomised controlled trials. Patients could now be conferred the benefits of the minimally invasive approach while retaining comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. However, the benefits of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer remained controversial. While the laparoscopic approach is more technically demanding, results from randomised controlled trials regarding long term oncologic outcomes are only beginning to be reported. The impacts of bladder and sexual functions following proctectomy are considerable and are important contributing factors to the patients' quality of life in the long-term. These issues present a delicate dilemma to the surgeon in his choice of operative approach in tackling rectal cancer. This is compounded further by the rapid proliferation of various laparoscopic techniques including the hand assisted, robotic assisted, and single port laparoscopy. This review article aims to draw on the significant studies which have been conducted to highlight the short- and long-term outcomes and evidence for laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4009228/ /pubmed/24822196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/347810 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dedrick Kok-Hong Chan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong
Chong, Choon-Seng
Lieske, Bettina
Tan, Ker-Kan
Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
title Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
title_full Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
title_short Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
title_sort laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: what is the evidence?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24822196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/347810
work_keys_str_mv AT chandedrickkokhong laparoscopicresectionforrectalcancerwhatistheevidence
AT chongchoonseng laparoscopicresectionforrectalcancerwhatistheevidence
AT lieskebettina laparoscopicresectionforrectalcancerwhatistheevidence
AT tankerkan laparoscopicresectionforrectalcancerwhatistheevidence