Cargando…
Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer is a well-established procedure supported by several well-conducted large-scale randomised controlled trials. Patients could now be conferred the benefits of the minimally invasive approach while retaining comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. Ho...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24822196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/347810 |
_version_ | 1782479731026821120 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong Chong, Choon-Seng Lieske, Bettina Tan, Ker-Kan |
author_facet | Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong Chong, Choon-Seng Lieske, Bettina Tan, Ker-Kan |
author_sort | Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer is a well-established procedure supported by several well-conducted large-scale randomised controlled trials. Patients could now be conferred the benefits of the minimally invasive approach while retaining comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. However, the benefits of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer remained controversial. While the laparoscopic approach is more technically demanding, results from randomised controlled trials regarding long term oncologic outcomes are only beginning to be reported. The impacts of bladder and sexual functions following proctectomy are considerable and are important contributing factors to the patients' quality of life in the long-term. These issues present a delicate dilemma to the surgeon in his choice of operative approach in tackling rectal cancer. This is compounded further by the rapid proliferation of various laparoscopic techniques including the hand assisted, robotic assisted, and single port laparoscopy. This review article aims to draw on the significant studies which have been conducted to highlight the short- and long-term outcomes and evidence for laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4009228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40092282014-05-12 Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence? Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong Chong, Choon-Seng Lieske, Bettina Tan, Ker-Kan Biomed Res Int Review Article Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer is a well-established procedure supported by several well-conducted large-scale randomised controlled trials. Patients could now be conferred the benefits of the minimally invasive approach while retaining comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. However, the benefits of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer remained controversial. While the laparoscopic approach is more technically demanding, results from randomised controlled trials regarding long term oncologic outcomes are only beginning to be reported. The impacts of bladder and sexual functions following proctectomy are considerable and are important contributing factors to the patients' quality of life in the long-term. These issues present a delicate dilemma to the surgeon in his choice of operative approach in tackling rectal cancer. This is compounded further by the rapid proliferation of various laparoscopic techniques including the hand assisted, robotic assisted, and single port laparoscopy. This review article aims to draw on the significant studies which have been conducted to highlight the short- and long-term outcomes and evidence for laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4009228/ /pubmed/24822196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/347810 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dedrick Kok-Hong Chan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong Chong, Choon-Seng Lieske, Bettina Tan, Ker-Kan Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence? |
title | Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence? |
title_full | Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence? |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence? |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence? |
title_short | Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence? |
title_sort | laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: what is the evidence? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24822196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/347810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandedrickkokhong laparoscopicresectionforrectalcancerwhatistheevidence AT chongchoonseng laparoscopicresectionforrectalcancerwhatistheevidence AT lieskebettina laparoscopicresectionforrectalcancerwhatistheevidence AT tankerkan laparoscopicresectionforrectalcancerwhatistheevidence |