Cargando…

One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of HeliFix Interspinous Process Decompression Device

Purpose. New interspinous process decompression devices (IPDs) provide an alternative to conservative treatment and decompressive surgery for patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) due to degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). HeliFix is a minimally invasive IPD that can be im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexandre, Alberto, Alexandre, Andrea Maria, De Pretto, Mario, Corò, Luca, Saggini, Raul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24822181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/176936
_version_ 1782479746758606848
author Alexandre, Alberto
Alexandre, Andrea Maria
De Pretto, Mario
Corò, Luca
Saggini, Raul
author_facet Alexandre, Alberto
Alexandre, Andrea Maria
De Pretto, Mario
Corò, Luca
Saggini, Raul
author_sort Alexandre, Alberto
collection PubMed
description Purpose. New interspinous process decompression devices (IPDs) provide an alternative to conservative treatment and decompressive surgery for patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) due to degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). HeliFix is a minimally invasive IPD that can be implanted percutaneously. This is a preliminary evaluation of safety and effectiveness of this IPD up to 12 months after implantation. Methods. After percutaneous implantation in 100 patients with NIC due to DLSS, data on symptoms, quality of life, pain, and use of pain medication were obtained for up to 12 months. Results. Early symptoms and physical function improvements were maintained for up to 12 months. Leg, buttock/groin, and back pain were eased throughout, and the use and strength of related pain medication were reduced. Devices were removed from 2% of patients due to lack of effectiveness. Conclusions. Overall, in a period of up to 12-month follow-up, the safety and effectiveness of the HeliFix offered a minimally invasive option for the relief of NIC complaints in a high proportion of patients. Further studies are undertaken in order to provide insight on outcomes and effectiveness compared to other decompression methods and to develop guidance on optimal patient selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4009302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40093022014-05-12 One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of HeliFix Interspinous Process Decompression Device Alexandre, Alberto Alexandre, Andrea Maria De Pretto, Mario Corò, Luca Saggini, Raul Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Purpose. New interspinous process decompression devices (IPDs) provide an alternative to conservative treatment and decompressive surgery for patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) due to degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). HeliFix is a minimally invasive IPD that can be implanted percutaneously. This is a preliminary evaluation of safety and effectiveness of this IPD up to 12 months after implantation. Methods. After percutaneous implantation in 100 patients with NIC due to DLSS, data on symptoms, quality of life, pain, and use of pain medication were obtained for up to 12 months. Results. Early symptoms and physical function improvements were maintained for up to 12 months. Leg, buttock/groin, and back pain were eased throughout, and the use and strength of related pain medication were reduced. Devices were removed from 2% of patients due to lack of effectiveness. Conclusions. Overall, in a period of up to 12-month follow-up, the safety and effectiveness of the HeliFix offered a minimally invasive option for the relief of NIC complaints in a high proportion of patients. Further studies are undertaken in order to provide insight on outcomes and effectiveness compared to other decompression methods and to develop guidance on optimal patient selection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4009302/ /pubmed/24822181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/176936 Text en Copyright © 2014 Alberto Alexandre et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Alexandre, Alberto
Alexandre, Andrea Maria
De Pretto, Mario
Corò, Luca
Saggini, Raul
One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of HeliFix Interspinous Process Decompression Device
title One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of HeliFix Interspinous Process Decompression Device
title_full One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of HeliFix Interspinous Process Decompression Device
title_fullStr One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of HeliFix Interspinous Process Decompression Device
title_full_unstemmed One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of HeliFix Interspinous Process Decompression Device
title_short One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of HeliFix Interspinous Process Decompression Device
title_sort one-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of helifix interspinous process decompression device
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24822181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/176936
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrealberto oneyearfollowupofaseriesof100patientstreatedforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisbymeansofhelifixinterspinousprocessdecompressiondevice
AT alexandreandreamaria oneyearfollowupofaseriesof100patientstreatedforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisbymeansofhelifixinterspinousprocessdecompressiondevice
AT deprettomario oneyearfollowupofaseriesof100patientstreatedforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisbymeansofhelifixinterspinousprocessdecompressiondevice
AT coroluca oneyearfollowupofaseriesof100patientstreatedforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisbymeansofhelifixinterspinousprocessdecompressiondevice
AT sagginiraul oneyearfollowupofaseriesof100patientstreatedforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisbymeansofhelifixinterspinousprocessdecompressiondevice