Cargando…
Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers
BACKGROUND: Community-based cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly being conducted to address pressing global health concerns. Preparations for clinical trials are well-described, as are the steps for multi-component health service trials. However, guidance is lacking for addre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23594 |
_version_ | 1782479767123001344 |
---|---|
author | Yassi, Annalee O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle Engelbrecht, Michelle C. Uebel, Kerry Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth Bryce, Elizabeth Ann Buxton, Jane A Siegel, Jacob Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm |
author_facet | Yassi, Annalee O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle Engelbrecht, Michelle C. Uebel, Kerry Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth Bryce, Elizabeth Ann Buxton, Jane A Siegel, Jacob Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm |
author_sort | Yassi, Annalee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Community-based cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly being conducted to address pressing global health concerns. Preparations for clinical trials are well-described, as are the steps for multi-component health service trials. However, guidance is lacking for addressing the ethical and logistic challenges in (cluster) RCTs of population health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the factors that population health researchers must explicitly consider when planning RCTs within North–South partnerships. DESIGN: We reviewed our experiences and identified key ethical and logistic issues encountered during the pre-trial phase of a recently implemented RCT. This trial aimed to improve tuberculosis (TB) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prevention and care for health workers by enhancing workplace assessment capability, addressing concerns about confidentiality and stigma, and providing onsite counseling, testing, and treatment. An iterative framework was used to synthesize this analysis with lessons taken from other studies. RESULTS: The checklist of critical factors was grouped into eight categories: 1) Building trust and shared ownership; 2) Conducting feasibility studies throughout the process; 3) Building capacity; 4) Creating an appropriate information system; 5) Conducting pilot studies; 6) Securing stakeholder support, with a view to scale-up; 7) Continuously refining methodological rigor; and 8) Explicitly addressing all ethical issues both at the start and continuously as they arise. CONCLUSION: Researchers should allow for the significant investment of time and resources required for successful implementation of population health RCTs within North–South collaborations, recognize the iterative nature of the process, and be prepared to revise protocols as challenges emerge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4009485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40094852014-05-05 Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers Yassi, Annalee O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle Engelbrecht, Michelle C. Uebel, Kerry Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth Bryce, Elizabeth Ann Buxton, Jane A Siegel, Jacob Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm Glob Health Action Study Design Article BACKGROUND: Community-based cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly being conducted to address pressing global health concerns. Preparations for clinical trials are well-described, as are the steps for multi-component health service trials. However, guidance is lacking for addressing the ethical and logistic challenges in (cluster) RCTs of population health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the factors that population health researchers must explicitly consider when planning RCTs within North–South partnerships. DESIGN: We reviewed our experiences and identified key ethical and logistic issues encountered during the pre-trial phase of a recently implemented RCT. This trial aimed to improve tuberculosis (TB) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prevention and care for health workers by enhancing workplace assessment capability, addressing concerns about confidentiality and stigma, and providing onsite counseling, testing, and treatment. An iterative framework was used to synthesize this analysis with lessons taken from other studies. RESULTS: The checklist of critical factors was grouped into eight categories: 1) Building trust and shared ownership; 2) Conducting feasibility studies throughout the process; 3) Building capacity; 4) Creating an appropriate information system; 5) Conducting pilot studies; 6) Securing stakeholder support, with a view to scale-up; 7) Continuously refining methodological rigor; and 8) Explicitly addressing all ethical issues both at the start and continuously as they arise. CONCLUSION: Researchers should allow for the significant investment of time and resources required for successful implementation of population health RCTs within North–South collaborations, recognize the iterative nature of the process, and be prepared to revise protocols as challenges emerge. Co-Action Publishing 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4009485/ /pubmed/24802561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23594 Text en © 2014 Annalee Yassi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Design Article Yassi, Annalee O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle Engelbrecht, Michelle C. Uebel, Kerry Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth Bryce, Elizabeth Ann Buxton, Jane A Siegel, Jacob Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers |
title | Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers |
title_full | Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers |
title_fullStr | Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers |
title_short | Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers |
title_sort | considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a south african–canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers |
topic | Study Design Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yassiannalee considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers AT oharalyndsaymichelle considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers AT engelbrechtmichellec considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers AT uebelkerry considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers AT nophaleletshegoelizabeth considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers AT bryceelizabethann considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers AT buxtonjanea considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers AT siegeljacob considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers AT spiegeljerrymalcolm considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers |