Cargando…

Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers

BACKGROUND: Community-based cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly being conducted to address pressing global health concerns. Preparations for clinical trials are well-described, as are the steps for multi-component health service trials. However, guidance is lacking for addre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yassi, Annalee, O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle, Engelbrecht, Michelle C., Uebel, Kerry, Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth, Bryce, Elizabeth Ann, Buxton, Jane A, Siegel, Jacob, Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802561
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23594
_version_ 1782479767123001344
author Yassi, Annalee
O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle
Engelbrecht, Michelle C.
Uebel, Kerry
Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth
Bryce, Elizabeth Ann
Buxton, Jane A
Siegel, Jacob
Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm
author_facet Yassi, Annalee
O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle
Engelbrecht, Michelle C.
Uebel, Kerry
Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth
Bryce, Elizabeth Ann
Buxton, Jane A
Siegel, Jacob
Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm
author_sort Yassi, Annalee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community-based cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly being conducted to address pressing global health concerns. Preparations for clinical trials are well-described, as are the steps for multi-component health service trials. However, guidance is lacking for addressing the ethical and logistic challenges in (cluster) RCTs of population health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the factors that population health researchers must explicitly consider when planning RCTs within North–South partnerships. DESIGN: We reviewed our experiences and identified key ethical and logistic issues encountered during the pre-trial phase of a recently implemented RCT. This trial aimed to improve tuberculosis (TB) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prevention and care for health workers by enhancing workplace assessment capability, addressing concerns about confidentiality and stigma, and providing onsite counseling, testing, and treatment. An iterative framework was used to synthesize this analysis with lessons taken from other studies. RESULTS: The checklist of critical factors was grouped into eight categories: 1) Building trust and shared ownership; 2) Conducting feasibility studies throughout the process; 3) Building capacity; 4) Creating an appropriate information system; 5) Conducting pilot studies; 6) Securing stakeholder support, with a view to scale-up; 7) Continuously refining methodological rigor; and 8) Explicitly addressing all ethical issues both at the start and continuously as they arise. CONCLUSION: Researchers should allow for the significant investment of time and resources required for successful implementation of population health RCTs within North–South collaborations, recognize the iterative nature of the process, and be prepared to revise protocols as challenges emerge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4009485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40094852014-05-05 Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers Yassi, Annalee O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle Engelbrecht, Michelle C. Uebel, Kerry Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth Bryce, Elizabeth Ann Buxton, Jane A Siegel, Jacob Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm Glob Health Action Study Design Article BACKGROUND: Community-based cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly being conducted to address pressing global health concerns. Preparations for clinical trials are well-described, as are the steps for multi-component health service trials. However, guidance is lacking for addressing the ethical and logistic challenges in (cluster) RCTs of population health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the factors that population health researchers must explicitly consider when planning RCTs within North–South partnerships. DESIGN: We reviewed our experiences and identified key ethical and logistic issues encountered during the pre-trial phase of a recently implemented RCT. This trial aimed to improve tuberculosis (TB) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prevention and care for health workers by enhancing workplace assessment capability, addressing concerns about confidentiality and stigma, and providing onsite counseling, testing, and treatment. An iterative framework was used to synthesize this analysis with lessons taken from other studies. RESULTS: The checklist of critical factors was grouped into eight categories: 1) Building trust and shared ownership; 2) Conducting feasibility studies throughout the process; 3) Building capacity; 4) Creating an appropriate information system; 5) Conducting pilot studies; 6) Securing stakeholder support, with a view to scale-up; 7) Continuously refining methodological rigor; and 8) Explicitly addressing all ethical issues both at the start and continuously as they arise. CONCLUSION: Researchers should allow for the significant investment of time and resources required for successful implementation of population health RCTs within North–South collaborations, recognize the iterative nature of the process, and be prepared to revise protocols as challenges emerge. Co-Action Publishing 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4009485/ /pubmed/24802561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23594 Text en © 2014 Annalee Yassi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Design Article
Yassi, Annalee
O’Hara, Lyndsay Michelle
Engelbrecht, Michelle C.
Uebel, Kerry
Nophale, Letshego Elizabeth
Bryce, Elizabeth Ann
Buxton, Jane A
Siegel, Jacob
Spiegel, Jerry Malcolm
Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers
title Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers
title_full Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers
title_fullStr Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers
title_short Considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a South African–Canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers
title_sort considerations for preparing a randomized population health intervention trial: lessons from a south african–canadian partnership to improve the health of health workers
topic Study Design Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802561
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23594
work_keys_str_mv AT yassiannalee considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers
AT oharalyndsaymichelle considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers
AT engelbrechtmichellec considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers
AT uebelkerry considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers
AT nophaleletshegoelizabeth considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers
AT bryceelizabethann considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers
AT buxtonjanea considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers
AT siegeljacob considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers
AT spiegeljerrymalcolm considerationsforpreparingarandomizedpopulationhealthinterventiontriallessonsfromasouthafricancanadianpartnershiptoimprovethehealthofhealthworkers