Cargando…
Effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: A Quasi experimental study
Background: Using aspirin, heparin, or both in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage could be useful, because this problem might be initiated by thrombosis in decidual vessels. Objective: To investigate the association between thrombophilia and unexplained recurrent miscarriage and to evaluat...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Research and Clinical Center for Infertility
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24799864 |
_version_ | 1782479772543090688 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Using aspirin, heparin, or both in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage could be useful, because this problem might be initiated by thrombosis in decidual vessels. Objective: To investigate the association between thrombophilia and unexplained recurrent miscarriage and to evaluate the efficacy of anticoagulant treatment. Materials and Methods: In this quasi experimental, we enrolled 520 women, who had a history of recurrent miscarriage. Two hundred fifty two women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage were assigned to receive aspirin (80 mg daily) for two month before pregnancy and after confirmation of a viable pregnancy until 36 weeks of gestation or receive aspirin, as the same, plus heparin (5000 unit twice a day) subcutaneously after confirmation of viable pregnancy until 4 weeks after delivery. Type of medication was chosen for each woman according to number of abortion and age. Results: Live-birth rates did not different significantly among the two study groups. The proportions of women who gave birth to a live normal infant were 74.5% in the group receiving aspirin plus heparin (combination-therapy group) and 79.8% in the aspirin group. Conclusion: Live-birth rates did not different significantly among the two study groups. So, using aspirin or aspirin plus heparin did not change pregnancy rate in these patients. Using aspirin is easier than injecting heparin which should be chosen case by case. This article extracted from M.Sc. thesis. (Tahereh Jahaninejad) Registration ID in IRCT: IRCT2013102315123N1 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4009580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Research and Clinical Center for Infertility |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40095802014-05-05 Effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: A Quasi experimental study Iran J Reprod Med Original Article Background: Using aspirin, heparin, or both in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage could be useful, because this problem might be initiated by thrombosis in decidual vessels. Objective: To investigate the association between thrombophilia and unexplained recurrent miscarriage and to evaluate the efficacy of anticoagulant treatment. Materials and Methods: In this quasi experimental, we enrolled 520 women, who had a history of recurrent miscarriage. Two hundred fifty two women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage were assigned to receive aspirin (80 mg daily) for two month before pregnancy and after confirmation of a viable pregnancy until 36 weeks of gestation or receive aspirin, as the same, plus heparin (5000 unit twice a day) subcutaneously after confirmation of viable pregnancy until 4 weeks after delivery. Type of medication was chosen for each woman according to number of abortion and age. Results: Live-birth rates did not different significantly among the two study groups. The proportions of women who gave birth to a live normal infant were 74.5% in the group receiving aspirin plus heparin (combination-therapy group) and 79.8% in the aspirin group. Conclusion: Live-birth rates did not different significantly among the two study groups. So, using aspirin or aspirin plus heparin did not change pregnancy rate in these patients. Using aspirin is easier than injecting heparin which should be chosen case by case. This article extracted from M.Sc. thesis. (Tahereh Jahaninejad) Registration ID in IRCT: IRCT2013102315123N1 Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2014-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4009580/ /pubmed/24799864 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: A Quasi experimental study |
title | Effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: A Quasi experimental study |
title_full | Effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: A Quasi experimental study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: A Quasi experimental study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: A Quasi experimental study |
title_short | Effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: A Quasi experimental study |
title_sort | effectiveness of aspirin compare with heparin plus aspirin in recurrent pregnancy loss treatment: a quasi experimental study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24799864 |