Cargando…

Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used

BACKGROUND: Facial nerve monitoring, often required during total parotidectomy, precludes use of long acting muscle relaxants and propofol infusion is used solely to ensure patient immobility. We aimed to compare intraoperative patient immobility, hemodynamic stability and propofol consumption durin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajan, Sunil, Puthenveettil, Nitu, Paul, Jerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803757
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130016
_version_ 1782479783301480448
author Rajan, Sunil
Puthenveettil, Nitu
Paul, Jerry
author_facet Rajan, Sunil
Puthenveettil, Nitu
Paul, Jerry
author_sort Rajan, Sunil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Facial nerve monitoring, often required during total parotidectomy, precludes use of long acting muscle relaxants and propofol infusion is used solely to ensure patient immobility. We aimed to compare intraoperative patient immobility, hemodynamic stability and propofol consumption during total parotidectomy following a transtracheal block. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients were allocated to 2 equal groups. Preoperatively, group A patients received transtracheal block with 4 ml of 4% lidocaine, while no block was given to patients in group B. If there was patient movement, tachycardia or hypertension, group A patients received a bolus of propofol 30 mg and propofol infusion was started (100mg/hr). In group B, propofol infusion was started (100mg/hr) soon after intubation. RESULT: Both group A and B were comparable with respect to patient immobility and hemodynamic stability. There was no intraoperative propofol requirement in group A. CONCLUSION: Transtracheal block is a safe and successful alternative to propofol infusion during surgeries where muscle relaxants are to be avoided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4009639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40096392014-05-06 Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used Rajan, Sunil Puthenveettil, Nitu Paul, Jerry J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND: Facial nerve monitoring, often required during total parotidectomy, precludes use of long acting muscle relaxants and propofol infusion is used solely to ensure patient immobility. We aimed to compare intraoperative patient immobility, hemodynamic stability and propofol consumption during total parotidectomy following a transtracheal block. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients were allocated to 2 equal groups. Preoperatively, group A patients received transtracheal block with 4 ml of 4% lidocaine, while no block was given to patients in group B. If there was patient movement, tachycardia or hypertension, group A patients received a bolus of propofol 30 mg and propofol infusion was started (100mg/hr). In group B, propofol infusion was started (100mg/hr) soon after intubation. RESULT: Both group A and B were comparable with respect to patient immobility and hemodynamic stability. There was no intraoperative propofol requirement in group A. CONCLUSION: Transtracheal block is a safe and successful alternative to propofol infusion during surgeries where muscle relaxants are to be avoided. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4009639/ /pubmed/24803757 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130016 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rajan, Sunil
Puthenveettil, Nitu
Paul, Jerry
Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used
title Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used
title_full Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used
title_fullStr Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used
title_full_unstemmed Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used
title_short Transtracheal lidocaine: An alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used
title_sort transtracheal lidocaine: an alternative to intraoperative propofol infusion when muscle relaxants are not used
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803757
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130016
work_keys_str_mv AT rajansunil transtracheallidocaineanalternativetointraoperativepropofolinfusionwhenmusclerelaxantsarenotused
AT puthenveettilnitu transtracheallidocaineanalternativetointraoperativepropofolinfusionwhenmusclerelaxantsarenotused
AT pauljerry transtracheallidocaineanalternativetointraoperativepropofolinfusionwhenmusclerelaxantsarenotused