Cargando…

Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron

BACKGROUND: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous (IV) injection. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study was to determine whether pre-treatment with IV ramosetron, used for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), would reduce propo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Dipali, Jagannath, Sathyanarayan, Priye, Shio, Shivaprakash, Kadli, Chandrashekar, Reddy, Durgaprasad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803760
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130023
_version_ 1782479783951597568
author Singh, Dipali
Jagannath, Sathyanarayan
Priye, Shio
Shivaprakash,
Kadli, Chandrashekar
Reddy, Durgaprasad
author_facet Singh, Dipali
Jagannath, Sathyanarayan
Priye, Shio
Shivaprakash,
Kadli, Chandrashekar
Reddy, Durgaprasad
author_sort Singh, Dipali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous (IV) injection. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study was to determine whether pre-treatment with IV ramosetron, used for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), would reduce propofol-induced pain as an equivalent to lidocaine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred and twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (ASA) I and II patients were randomly assigned into three groups (40 in each). Group N received 2 ml of 0.9% saline, Group L received 2 ml of lidocaine, and Group R received 2 ml of ramosetron. Mid forearm was occluded manually before injection and released after 1 min and then propofol was injected over 5 s. Patients were observed and questioned 15 s later if they had pain in the arm and pain was scored on a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain. Unpaired Student's t-test and chi-square test/Fisher’ exact test were used to analyze results. RESULTS: The incidence of pain in groups N, L, and R were 65, 35, and 30%, respectively. Pain was reduced significantly in the groups L and R (P < 0.05). Two patients each in Groups L and R (5% each) had moderate and severe pain. This difference in pain was statistically insignificant, but when compared to Group N (25 and 30%, respectively) it was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with ramosetron 0.3 mg and lidocaine 40 mg are equally effective in preventing pain from propofol injection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4009642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40096422014-05-06 Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron Singh, Dipali Jagannath, Sathyanarayan Priye, Shio Shivaprakash, Kadli, Chandrashekar Reddy, Durgaprasad J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous (IV) injection. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study was to determine whether pre-treatment with IV ramosetron, used for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), would reduce propofol-induced pain as an equivalent to lidocaine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred and twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (ASA) I and II patients were randomly assigned into three groups (40 in each). Group N received 2 ml of 0.9% saline, Group L received 2 ml of lidocaine, and Group R received 2 ml of ramosetron. Mid forearm was occluded manually before injection and released after 1 min and then propofol was injected over 5 s. Patients were observed and questioned 15 s later if they had pain in the arm and pain was scored on a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain. Unpaired Student's t-test and chi-square test/Fisher’ exact test were used to analyze results. RESULTS: The incidence of pain in groups N, L, and R were 65, 35, and 30%, respectively. Pain was reduced significantly in the groups L and R (P < 0.05). Two patients each in Groups L and R (5% each) had moderate and severe pain. This difference in pain was statistically insignificant, but when compared to Group N (25 and 30%, respectively) it was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with ramosetron 0.3 mg and lidocaine 40 mg are equally effective in preventing pain from propofol injection. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4009642/ /pubmed/24803760 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130023 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Dipali
Jagannath, Sathyanarayan
Priye, Shio
Shivaprakash,
Kadli, Chandrashekar
Reddy, Durgaprasad
Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron
title Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron
title_full Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron
title_fullStr Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron
title_full_unstemmed Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron
title_short Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron
title_sort prevention of propofol injection pain: comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803760
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130023
work_keys_str_mv AT singhdipali preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron
AT jagannathsathyanarayan preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron
AT priyeshio preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron
AT shivaprakash preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron
AT kadlichandrashekar preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron
AT reddydurgaprasad preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron