Cargando…
Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron
BACKGROUND: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous (IV) injection. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study was to determine whether pre-treatment with IV ramosetron, used for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), would reduce propo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803760 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130023 |
_version_ | 1782479783951597568 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Dipali Jagannath, Sathyanarayan Priye, Shio Shivaprakash, Kadli, Chandrashekar Reddy, Durgaprasad |
author_facet | Singh, Dipali Jagannath, Sathyanarayan Priye, Shio Shivaprakash, Kadli, Chandrashekar Reddy, Durgaprasad |
author_sort | Singh, Dipali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous (IV) injection. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study was to determine whether pre-treatment with IV ramosetron, used for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), would reduce propofol-induced pain as an equivalent to lidocaine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred and twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (ASA) I and II patients were randomly assigned into three groups (40 in each). Group N received 2 ml of 0.9% saline, Group L received 2 ml of lidocaine, and Group R received 2 ml of ramosetron. Mid forearm was occluded manually before injection and released after 1 min and then propofol was injected over 5 s. Patients were observed and questioned 15 s later if they had pain in the arm and pain was scored on a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain. Unpaired Student's t-test and chi-square test/Fisher’ exact test were used to analyze results. RESULTS: The incidence of pain in groups N, L, and R were 65, 35, and 30%, respectively. Pain was reduced significantly in the groups L and R (P < 0.05). Two patients each in Groups L and R (5% each) had moderate and severe pain. This difference in pain was statistically insignificant, but when compared to Group N (25 and 30%, respectively) it was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with ramosetron 0.3 mg and lidocaine 40 mg are equally effective in preventing pain from propofol injection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4009642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40096422014-05-06 Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron Singh, Dipali Jagannath, Sathyanarayan Priye, Shio Shivaprakash, Kadli, Chandrashekar Reddy, Durgaprasad J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous (IV) injection. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study was to determine whether pre-treatment with IV ramosetron, used for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), would reduce propofol-induced pain as an equivalent to lidocaine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred and twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (ASA) I and II patients were randomly assigned into three groups (40 in each). Group N received 2 ml of 0.9% saline, Group L received 2 ml of lidocaine, and Group R received 2 ml of ramosetron. Mid forearm was occluded manually before injection and released after 1 min and then propofol was injected over 5 s. Patients were observed and questioned 15 s later if they had pain in the arm and pain was scored on a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain. Unpaired Student's t-test and chi-square test/Fisher’ exact test were used to analyze results. RESULTS: The incidence of pain in groups N, L, and R were 65, 35, and 30%, respectively. Pain was reduced significantly in the groups L and R (P < 0.05). Two patients each in Groups L and R (5% each) had moderate and severe pain. This difference in pain was statistically insignificant, but when compared to Group N (25 and 30%, respectively) it was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with ramosetron 0.3 mg and lidocaine 40 mg are equally effective in preventing pain from propofol injection. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4009642/ /pubmed/24803760 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130023 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Dipali Jagannath, Sathyanarayan Priye, Shio Shivaprakash, Kadli, Chandrashekar Reddy, Durgaprasad Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron |
title | Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron |
title_full | Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron |
title_fullStr | Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron |
title_short | Prevention of propofol injection pain: Comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron |
title_sort | prevention of propofol injection pain: comparison between lidocaine and ramosetron |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24803760 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhdipali preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron AT jagannathsathyanarayan preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron AT priyeshio preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron AT shivaprakash preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron AT kadlichandrashekar preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron AT reddydurgaprasad preventionofpropofolinjectionpaincomparisonbetweenlidocaineandramosetron |