Cargando…
Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog)
BACKGROUND: There is a growing tendency toward application of human amniotic membrane (HAM) as a biologic substitute in various tissue injuries where a significant tissue loss is a matter of concern. In gastrointestinal injuries especially duodenal ones, some potential limitations in current surgica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24804187 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.131029 |
_version_ | 1782479812709842944 |
---|---|
author | Ghahramani, Leila Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour Dehghani, Mohammad Reza Ashraf, Mohammad Javad Rahimikazerooni, Salar Rezaianzadeh, Abbas Safarpour, Ali Reza Hosseini, Seyed Vahid |
author_facet | Ghahramani, Leila Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour Dehghani, Mohammad Reza Ashraf, Mohammad Javad Rahimikazerooni, Salar Rezaianzadeh, Abbas Safarpour, Ali Reza Hosseini, Seyed Vahid |
author_sort | Ghahramani, Leila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a growing tendency toward application of human amniotic membrane (HAM) as a biologic substitute in various tissue injuries where a significant tissue loss is a matter of concern. In gastrointestinal injuries especially duodenal ones, some potential limitations in current surgical techniques contribute to not fully acceptable healing outcomes. Thus, this study was carried out to assess repair with HAM patch for duodenal defect in comparison with simple duodenoraphy in an animal model (dog). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 male German shepherd dogs weighing 23-27 kg were randomly divided into two groups. Group A with 10 dogs, which were a candidate for duodenal repair by amniotic membrane patch and Group B consisted of 5 dogs perform simple duodenorraphy. A precise control was made to match all conditions except surgical technique. Macroscopic and microscopic features of the healed duodenal lumen in both groups were recorded. RESULTS: Gross evaluation revealed no difference in luminal diameter in both groups. Statistical analysis of duodenal diameter between both groups after operation also showed no significant difference (P(v) = 0.789). Histological assessment indicated less inflammation with better wound healing in Group A. CONCLUSION: It seems that repairing duodenal wall defect with HAM would result in better histological outcomes compared with what is seen in simple duodenoraphy in animal models. However, there is no significant difference regarding surgical findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4009825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40098252014-05-06 Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog) Ghahramani, Leila Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour Dehghani, Mohammad Reza Ashraf, Mohammad Javad Rahimikazerooni, Salar Rezaianzadeh, Abbas Safarpour, Ali Reza Hosseini, Seyed Vahid Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing tendency toward application of human amniotic membrane (HAM) as a biologic substitute in various tissue injuries where a significant tissue loss is a matter of concern. In gastrointestinal injuries especially duodenal ones, some potential limitations in current surgical techniques contribute to not fully acceptable healing outcomes. Thus, this study was carried out to assess repair with HAM patch for duodenal defect in comparison with simple duodenoraphy in an animal model (dog). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 male German shepherd dogs weighing 23-27 kg were randomly divided into two groups. Group A with 10 dogs, which were a candidate for duodenal repair by amniotic membrane patch and Group B consisted of 5 dogs perform simple duodenorraphy. A precise control was made to match all conditions except surgical technique. Macroscopic and microscopic features of the healed duodenal lumen in both groups were recorded. RESULTS: Gross evaluation revealed no difference in luminal diameter in both groups. Statistical analysis of duodenal diameter between both groups after operation also showed no significant difference (P(v) = 0.789). Histological assessment indicated less inflammation with better wound healing in Group A. CONCLUSION: It seems that repairing duodenal wall defect with HAM would result in better histological outcomes compared with what is seen in simple duodenoraphy in animal models. However, there is no significant difference regarding surgical findings. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4009825/ /pubmed/24804187 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.131029 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Ghahramani. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ghahramani, Leila Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour Dehghani, Mohammad Reza Ashraf, Mohammad Javad Rahimikazerooni, Salar Rezaianzadeh, Abbas Safarpour, Ali Reza Hosseini, Seyed Vahid Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog) |
title | Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog) |
title_full | Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog) |
title_short | Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog) |
title_sort | evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: an animal model (dog) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24804187 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.131029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghahramanileila evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog AT jahromialibagherpour evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog AT dehghanimohammadreza evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog AT ashrafmohammadjavad evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog AT rahimikazeroonisalar evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog AT rezaianzadehabbas evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog AT safarpouralireza evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog AT hosseiniseyedvahid evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog |