Cargando…

Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog)

BACKGROUND: There is a growing tendency toward application of human amniotic membrane (HAM) as a biologic substitute in various tissue injuries where a significant tissue loss is a matter of concern. In gastrointestinal injuries especially duodenal ones, some potential limitations in current surgica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghahramani, Leila, Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour, Dehghani, Mohammad Reza, Ashraf, Mohammad Javad, Rahimikazerooni, Salar, Rezaianzadeh, Abbas, Safarpour, Ali Reza, Hosseini, Seyed Vahid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24804187
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.131029
_version_ 1782479812709842944
author Ghahramani, Leila
Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour
Dehghani, Mohammad Reza
Ashraf, Mohammad Javad
Rahimikazerooni, Salar
Rezaianzadeh, Abbas
Safarpour, Ali Reza
Hosseini, Seyed Vahid
author_facet Ghahramani, Leila
Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour
Dehghani, Mohammad Reza
Ashraf, Mohammad Javad
Rahimikazerooni, Salar
Rezaianzadeh, Abbas
Safarpour, Ali Reza
Hosseini, Seyed Vahid
author_sort Ghahramani, Leila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing tendency toward application of human amniotic membrane (HAM) as a biologic substitute in various tissue injuries where a significant tissue loss is a matter of concern. In gastrointestinal injuries especially duodenal ones, some potential limitations in current surgical techniques contribute to not fully acceptable healing outcomes. Thus, this study was carried out to assess repair with HAM patch for duodenal defect in comparison with simple duodenoraphy in an animal model (dog). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 male German shepherd dogs weighing 23-27 kg were randomly divided into two groups. Group A with 10 dogs, which were a candidate for duodenal repair by amniotic membrane patch and Group B consisted of 5 dogs perform simple duodenorraphy. A precise control was made to match all conditions except surgical technique. Macroscopic and microscopic features of the healed duodenal lumen in both groups were recorded. RESULTS: Gross evaluation revealed no difference in luminal diameter in both groups. Statistical analysis of duodenal diameter between both groups after operation also showed no significant difference (P(v) = 0.789). Histological assessment indicated less inflammation with better wound healing in Group A. CONCLUSION: It seems that repairing duodenal wall defect with HAM would result in better histological outcomes compared with what is seen in simple duodenoraphy in animal models. However, there is no significant difference regarding surgical findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4009825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40098252014-05-06 Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog) Ghahramani, Leila Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour Dehghani, Mohammad Reza Ashraf, Mohammad Javad Rahimikazerooni, Salar Rezaianzadeh, Abbas Safarpour, Ali Reza Hosseini, Seyed Vahid Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing tendency toward application of human amniotic membrane (HAM) as a biologic substitute in various tissue injuries where a significant tissue loss is a matter of concern. In gastrointestinal injuries especially duodenal ones, some potential limitations in current surgical techniques contribute to not fully acceptable healing outcomes. Thus, this study was carried out to assess repair with HAM patch for duodenal defect in comparison with simple duodenoraphy in an animal model (dog). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 male German shepherd dogs weighing 23-27 kg were randomly divided into two groups. Group A with 10 dogs, which were a candidate for duodenal repair by amniotic membrane patch and Group B consisted of 5 dogs perform simple duodenorraphy. A precise control was made to match all conditions except surgical technique. Macroscopic and microscopic features of the healed duodenal lumen in both groups were recorded. RESULTS: Gross evaluation revealed no difference in luminal diameter in both groups. Statistical analysis of duodenal diameter between both groups after operation also showed no significant difference (P(v) = 0.789). Histological assessment indicated less inflammation with better wound healing in Group A. CONCLUSION: It seems that repairing duodenal wall defect with HAM would result in better histological outcomes compared with what is seen in simple duodenoraphy in animal models. However, there is no significant difference regarding surgical findings. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4009825/ /pubmed/24804187 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.131029 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Ghahramani. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghahramani, Leila
Jahromi, Ali Bagherpour
Dehghani, Mohammad Reza
Ashraf, Mohammad Javad
Rahimikazerooni, Salar
Rezaianzadeh, Abbas
Safarpour, Ali Reza
Hosseini, Seyed Vahid
Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog)
title Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog)
title_full Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog)
title_fullStr Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog)
title_short Evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: An animal model (dog)
title_sort evaluation of repair in duodenal perforation with human amniotic membrane: an animal model (dog)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24804187
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.131029
work_keys_str_mv AT ghahramanileila evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog
AT jahromialibagherpour evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog
AT dehghanimohammadreza evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog
AT ashrafmohammadjavad evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog
AT rahimikazeroonisalar evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog
AT rezaianzadehabbas evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog
AT safarpouralireza evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog
AT hosseiniseyedvahid evaluationofrepairinduodenalperforationwithhumanamnioticmembraneananimalmodeldog