Cargando…
Processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress
In the present behavioral and fMRI study, we investigated for the first time interindividual variability in word stress processing in a language with variable stress position (German) in order to identify behavioral predictors and neural correlates underlying these differences. It has been argued th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24808879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00365 |
_version_ | 1782479907171860480 |
---|---|
author | Heisterueber, Miriam Klein, Elise Willmes, Klaus Heim, Stefan Domahs, Frank |
author_facet | Heisterueber, Miriam Klein, Elise Willmes, Klaus Heim, Stefan Domahs, Frank |
author_sort | Heisterueber, Miriam |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present behavioral and fMRI study, we investigated for the first time interindividual variability in word stress processing in a language with variable stress position (German) in order to identify behavioral predictors and neural correlates underlying these differences. It has been argued that speakers of languages with variable stress should perform relatively well in tasks tapping into the representation and processing of word stress, given that this is a relevant feature of their language. Nevertheless, in previous studies on word stress processing large degrees of interindividual variability have been observed but were ignored or left unexplained. Twenty-five native speakers of German performed a sequence recall task using both segmental and suprasegmental stimuli. In general, the suprasegmental condition activated a subcortico-cortico-cerebellar network including, amongst others, bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, insula, precuneus, cerebellum, the basal ganglia, pre-SMA and SMA, which has been suggested to be dedicated to the processing of temporal aspects of speech. However, substantial interindividual differences were observed. In particular, main effects of group were observed in the left middle temporal gyrus (below vs. above average performance in stress processing) and in the left precuneus (above vs. below average). Moreover, condition (segmental vs. suprasegmental) and group (above vs. below average) interacted in the right hippocampus and cerebellum. At the behavioral level, differences in word stress processing could be partly explained by individual performance in basic auditory perception including duration discrimination and by working memory performance (WM). We conclude that even in a language with variable stress, interindividual differences in behavioral performance and in the neuro-cognitive foundations of stress processing can be observed which may partly be traced back to individual basic auditory processing and WM performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4010785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40107852014-05-07 Processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress Heisterueber, Miriam Klein, Elise Willmes, Klaus Heim, Stefan Domahs, Frank Front Psychol Psychology In the present behavioral and fMRI study, we investigated for the first time interindividual variability in word stress processing in a language with variable stress position (German) in order to identify behavioral predictors and neural correlates underlying these differences. It has been argued that speakers of languages with variable stress should perform relatively well in tasks tapping into the representation and processing of word stress, given that this is a relevant feature of their language. Nevertheless, in previous studies on word stress processing large degrees of interindividual variability have been observed but were ignored or left unexplained. Twenty-five native speakers of German performed a sequence recall task using both segmental and suprasegmental stimuli. In general, the suprasegmental condition activated a subcortico-cortico-cerebellar network including, amongst others, bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, insula, precuneus, cerebellum, the basal ganglia, pre-SMA and SMA, which has been suggested to be dedicated to the processing of temporal aspects of speech. However, substantial interindividual differences were observed. In particular, main effects of group were observed in the left middle temporal gyrus (below vs. above average performance in stress processing) and in the left precuneus (above vs. below average). Moreover, condition (segmental vs. suprasegmental) and group (above vs. below average) interacted in the right hippocampus and cerebellum. At the behavioral level, differences in word stress processing could be partly explained by individual performance in basic auditory perception including duration discrimination and by working memory performance (WM). We conclude that even in a language with variable stress, interindividual differences in behavioral performance and in the neuro-cognitive foundations of stress processing can be observed which may partly be traced back to individual basic auditory processing and WM performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4010785/ /pubmed/24808879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00365 Text en Copyright © 2014 Heisterueber, Klein, Willmes, Heim and Domahs. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Heisterueber, Miriam Klein, Elise Willmes, Klaus Heim, Stefan Domahs, Frank Processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress |
title | Processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress |
title_full | Processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress |
title_fullStr | Processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress |
title_full_unstemmed | Processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress |
title_short | Processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress |
title_sort | processing word prosody—behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24808879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heisteruebermiriam processingwordprosodybehavioralandneuroimagingevidenceforheterogeneousperformanceinalanguagewithvariablestress AT kleinelise processingwordprosodybehavioralandneuroimagingevidenceforheterogeneousperformanceinalanguagewithvariablestress AT willmesklaus processingwordprosodybehavioralandneuroimagingevidenceforheterogeneousperformanceinalanguagewithvariablestress AT heimstefan processingwordprosodybehavioralandneuroimagingevidenceforheterogeneousperformanceinalanguagewithvariablestress AT domahsfrank processingwordprosodybehavioralandneuroimagingevidenceforheterogeneousperformanceinalanguagewithvariablestress |