Cargando…
Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: To investigate how smoking status is recorded in UK primary care; to evaluate whether appropriate multiple imputation (MI) of smoking status yields results consistent with health surveys. SETTING: UK primary care and a population survey conducted in the community. PARTICIPANTS: We identif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004958 |
_version_ | 1782479911015940096 |
---|---|
author | Marston, Louise Carpenter, James R Walters, Kate R Morris, Richard W Nazareth, Irwin White, Ian R Petersen, Irene |
author_facet | Marston, Louise Carpenter, James R Walters, Kate R Morris, Richard W Nazareth, Irwin White, Ian R Petersen, Irene |
author_sort | Marston, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate how smoking status is recorded in UK primary care; to evaluate whether appropriate multiple imputation (MI) of smoking status yields results consistent with health surveys. SETTING: UK primary care and a population survey conducted in the community. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 354 204 patients aged 16 or over in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database registered with their general practice 2008–2009 and 15 102 individuals aged 16 or over in the Health Survey for England (HSE). OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised and age-specific proportions of smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers in THIN and the HSE before and after MI. Using information on time since quitting in the HSE, we estimated when ex-smokers are typically recorded as non-smokers in primary care records. RESULTS: In THIN, smoking status was recorded for 84% of patients within 1 year of registration. Of these, 28% were smokers (21% in the HSE). After MI of missing smoking data, the proportion of smokers was 25% (missing at random) and 20% (missing not at random). With increasing age, more were identified as ex-smokers in the HSE than THIN. It appears that those who quit before age 30 were less likely to be recorded as an ex-smoker in primary care than people who quit later. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking status was relatively well recorded in primary care. Misclassification of ex-smokers as non-smokers is likely to occur in those quitting smoking at an early age and/or a long time ago. Those with no smoking status information are more likely to be ex-smokers or non-smokers than smokers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4010810 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40108102014-05-07 Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study Marston, Louise Carpenter, James R Walters, Kate R Morris, Richard W Nazareth, Irwin White, Ian R Petersen, Irene BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To investigate how smoking status is recorded in UK primary care; to evaluate whether appropriate multiple imputation (MI) of smoking status yields results consistent with health surveys. SETTING: UK primary care and a population survey conducted in the community. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 354 204 patients aged 16 or over in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database registered with their general practice 2008–2009 and 15 102 individuals aged 16 or over in the Health Survey for England (HSE). OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised and age-specific proportions of smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers in THIN and the HSE before and after MI. Using information on time since quitting in the HSE, we estimated when ex-smokers are typically recorded as non-smokers in primary care records. RESULTS: In THIN, smoking status was recorded for 84% of patients within 1 year of registration. Of these, 28% were smokers (21% in the HSE). After MI of missing smoking data, the proportion of smokers was 25% (missing at random) and 20% (missing not at random). With increasing age, more were identified as ex-smokers in the HSE than THIN. It appears that those who quit before age 30 were less likely to be recorded as an ex-smoker in primary care than people who quit later. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking status was relatively well recorded in primary care. Misclassification of ex-smokers as non-smokers is likely to occur in those quitting smoking at an early age and/or a long time ago. Those with no smoking status information are more likely to be ex-smokers or non-smokers than smokers. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4010810/ /pubmed/24760355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004958 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Marston, Louise Carpenter, James R Walters, Kate R Morris, Richard W Nazareth, Irwin White, Ian R Petersen, Irene Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study |
title | Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? the validity of routinely recorded smoking status in uk primary care: a cross-sectional study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marstonlouise smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy AT carpenterjamesr smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy AT walterskater smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy AT morrisrichardw smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy AT nazarethirwin smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy AT whiteianr smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy AT petersenirene smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy |