Cargando…

Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how smoking status is recorded in UK primary care; to evaluate whether appropriate multiple imputation (MI) of smoking status yields results consistent with health surveys. SETTING: UK primary care and a population survey conducted in the community. PARTICIPANTS: We identif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marston, Louise, Carpenter, James R, Walters, Kate R, Morris, Richard W, Nazareth, Irwin, White, Ian R, Petersen, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004958
_version_ 1782479911015940096
author Marston, Louise
Carpenter, James R
Walters, Kate R
Morris, Richard W
Nazareth, Irwin
White, Ian R
Petersen, Irene
author_facet Marston, Louise
Carpenter, James R
Walters, Kate R
Morris, Richard W
Nazareth, Irwin
White, Ian R
Petersen, Irene
author_sort Marston, Louise
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate how smoking status is recorded in UK primary care; to evaluate whether appropriate multiple imputation (MI) of smoking status yields results consistent with health surveys. SETTING: UK primary care and a population survey conducted in the community. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 354 204 patients aged 16 or over in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database registered with their general practice 2008–2009 and 15 102 individuals aged 16 or over in the Health Survey for England (HSE). OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised and age-specific proportions of smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers in THIN and the HSE before and after MI. Using information on time since quitting in the HSE, we estimated when ex-smokers are typically recorded as non-smokers in primary care records. RESULTS: In THIN, smoking status was recorded for 84% of patients within 1 year of registration. Of these, 28% were smokers (21% in the HSE). After MI of missing smoking data, the proportion of smokers was 25% (missing at random) and 20% (missing not at random). With increasing age, more were identified as ex-smokers in the HSE than THIN. It appears that those who quit before age 30 were less likely to be recorded as an ex-smoker in primary care than people who quit later. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking status was relatively well recorded in primary care. Misclassification of ex-smokers as non-smokers is likely to occur in those quitting smoking at an early age and/or a long time ago. Those with no smoking status information are more likely to be ex-smokers or non-smokers than smokers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4010810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40108102014-05-07 Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study Marston, Louise Carpenter, James R Walters, Kate R Morris, Richard W Nazareth, Irwin White, Ian R Petersen, Irene BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To investigate how smoking status is recorded in UK primary care; to evaluate whether appropriate multiple imputation (MI) of smoking status yields results consistent with health surveys. SETTING: UK primary care and a population survey conducted in the community. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 354 204 patients aged 16 or over in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database registered with their general practice 2008–2009 and 15 102 individuals aged 16 or over in the Health Survey for England (HSE). OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised and age-specific proportions of smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers in THIN and the HSE before and after MI. Using information on time since quitting in the HSE, we estimated when ex-smokers are typically recorded as non-smokers in primary care records. RESULTS: In THIN, smoking status was recorded for 84% of patients within 1 year of registration. Of these, 28% were smokers (21% in the HSE). After MI of missing smoking data, the proportion of smokers was 25% (missing at random) and 20% (missing not at random). With increasing age, more were identified as ex-smokers in the HSE than THIN. It appears that those who quit before age 30 were less likely to be recorded as an ex-smoker in primary care than people who quit later. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking status was relatively well recorded in primary care. Misclassification of ex-smokers as non-smokers is likely to occur in those quitting smoking at an early age and/or a long time ago. Those with no smoking status information are more likely to be ex-smokers or non-smokers than smokers. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4010810/ /pubmed/24760355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004958 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Marston, Louise
Carpenter, James R
Walters, Kate R
Morris, Richard W
Nazareth, Irwin
White, Ian R
Petersen, Irene
Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study
title Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_full Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_short Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study
title_sort smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? the validity of routinely recorded smoking status in uk primary care: a cross-sectional study
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004958
work_keys_str_mv AT marstonlouise smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT carpenterjamesr smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT walterskater smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT morrisrichardw smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT nazarethirwin smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT whiteianr smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT petersenirene smokerexsmokerornonsmokerthevalidityofroutinelyrecordedsmokingstatusinukprimarycareacrosssectionalstudy