Cargando…
A Community Jury on PSA screening: what do well-informed men want the government to do about prostate cancer screening—a qualitative analysis
OBJECTIVE: Cancer screening policies and programmes should take account of public values and concerns. This study sought to determine the priorities, values and concerns of men who were ‘fully informed’ about the benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening; and empirically examin...
Autores principales: | Rychetnik, Lucie, Doust, Jenny, Thomas, Rae, Gardiner, Robert, MacKenzie, Geraldine, Glasziou, Paul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24785399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004682 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening
por: Thomas, Rae, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries – Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996–2015
por: Thomas, Rae, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
When do women really want to attend screening?
por: Wallis, MG, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
An Australian community jury to consider case‐finding for dementia: Differences between informed community preferences and general practice guidelines
por: Thomas, Rae, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Primary goals, information-giving and men’s understanding: a qualitative study of Australian and UK doctors’ varied communication about PSA screening
por: Pickles, Kristen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)