Cargando…

A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands

The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeandron, Aurelie, Ensink, Jeroen H. J., Thamsborg, Stig M., Dalsgaard, Anders, Sengupta, Mita E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731
_version_ 1782314837965012992
author Jeandron, Aurelie
Ensink, Jeroen H. J.
Thamsborg, Stig M.
Dalsgaard, Anders
Sengupta, Mita E.
author_facet Jeandron, Aurelie
Ensink, Jeroen H. J.
Thamsborg, Stig M.
Dalsgaard, Anders
Sengupta, Mita E.
author_sort Jeandron, Aurelie
collection PubMed
description The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to assess the number of Ascaris eggs on hands and determine the egg recovery rate of the method. Under laboratory conditions, hands were seeded with a known number of Ascaris eggs, air dried and washed in a plastic bag retaining the washing water, in order to determine recovery rates of eggs for four different detergents (cationic [benzethonium chloride 0.1% and cetylpyridinium chloride CPC 0.1%], anionic [7X 1% - quadrafos, glycol ether, and dioctyl sulfoccinate sodium salt] and non-ionic [Tween80 0.1% -polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleate]) and two egg detection methods (McMaster technique and FLOTAC). A modified concentration McMaster technique showed the highest egg recovery rate from bags. Two of the four diluted detergents (benzethonium chloride 0.1% and 7X 1%) also showed a higher egg recovery rate and were then compared with de-ionized water for recovery of helminth eggs from hands. The highest recovery rate (95.6%) was achieved with a hand rinse performed with 7X 1%. Washing hands with de-ionized water resulted in an egg recovery rate of 82.7%. This washing method performed with a low concentration of detergent offers potential for quantitative investigation of contamination of hands with Ascaris eggs and of their role in human infection. Follow-up studies are needed that validate the hand washing method under field conditions, e.g. including people of different age, lower levels of contamination and various levels of hand cleanliness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4011755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40117552014-05-09 A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands Jeandron, Aurelie Ensink, Jeroen H. J. Thamsborg, Stig M. Dalsgaard, Anders Sengupta, Mita E. PLoS One Research Article The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to assess the number of Ascaris eggs on hands and determine the egg recovery rate of the method. Under laboratory conditions, hands were seeded with a known number of Ascaris eggs, air dried and washed in a plastic bag retaining the washing water, in order to determine recovery rates of eggs for four different detergents (cationic [benzethonium chloride 0.1% and cetylpyridinium chloride CPC 0.1%], anionic [7X 1% - quadrafos, glycol ether, and dioctyl sulfoccinate sodium salt] and non-ionic [Tween80 0.1% -polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleate]) and two egg detection methods (McMaster technique and FLOTAC). A modified concentration McMaster technique showed the highest egg recovery rate from bags. Two of the four diluted detergents (benzethonium chloride 0.1% and 7X 1%) also showed a higher egg recovery rate and were then compared with de-ionized water for recovery of helminth eggs from hands. The highest recovery rate (95.6%) was achieved with a hand rinse performed with 7X 1%. Washing hands with de-ionized water resulted in an egg recovery rate of 82.7%. This washing method performed with a low concentration of detergent offers potential for quantitative investigation of contamination of hands with Ascaris eggs and of their role in human infection. Follow-up studies are needed that validate the hand washing method under field conditions, e.g. including people of different age, lower levels of contamination and various levels of hand cleanliness. Public Library of Science 2014-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4011755/ /pubmed/24802859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731 Text en © 2014 Jeandron et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jeandron, Aurelie
Ensink, Jeroen H. J.
Thamsborg, Stig M.
Dalsgaard, Anders
Sengupta, Mita E.
A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands
title A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands
title_full A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands
title_fullStr A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands
title_full_unstemmed A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands
title_short A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands
title_sort quantitative assessment method for ascaris eggs on hands
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731
work_keys_str_mv AT jeandronaurelie aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT ensinkjeroenhj aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT thamsborgstigm aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT dalsgaardanders aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT senguptamitae aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT jeandronaurelie quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT ensinkjeroenhj quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT thamsborgstigm quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT dalsgaardanders quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands
AT senguptamitae quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands