Cargando…
A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands
The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731 |
_version_ | 1782314837965012992 |
---|---|
author | Jeandron, Aurelie Ensink, Jeroen H. J. Thamsborg, Stig M. Dalsgaard, Anders Sengupta, Mita E. |
author_facet | Jeandron, Aurelie Ensink, Jeroen H. J. Thamsborg, Stig M. Dalsgaard, Anders Sengupta, Mita E. |
author_sort | Jeandron, Aurelie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to assess the number of Ascaris eggs on hands and determine the egg recovery rate of the method. Under laboratory conditions, hands were seeded with a known number of Ascaris eggs, air dried and washed in a plastic bag retaining the washing water, in order to determine recovery rates of eggs for four different detergents (cationic [benzethonium chloride 0.1% and cetylpyridinium chloride CPC 0.1%], anionic [7X 1% - quadrafos, glycol ether, and dioctyl sulfoccinate sodium salt] and non-ionic [Tween80 0.1% -polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleate]) and two egg detection methods (McMaster technique and FLOTAC). A modified concentration McMaster technique showed the highest egg recovery rate from bags. Two of the four diluted detergents (benzethonium chloride 0.1% and 7X 1%) also showed a higher egg recovery rate and were then compared with de-ionized water for recovery of helminth eggs from hands. The highest recovery rate (95.6%) was achieved with a hand rinse performed with 7X 1%. Washing hands with de-ionized water resulted in an egg recovery rate of 82.7%. This washing method performed with a low concentration of detergent offers potential for quantitative investigation of contamination of hands with Ascaris eggs and of their role in human infection. Follow-up studies are needed that validate the hand washing method under field conditions, e.g. including people of different age, lower levels of contamination and various levels of hand cleanliness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4011755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40117552014-05-09 A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands Jeandron, Aurelie Ensink, Jeroen H. J. Thamsborg, Stig M. Dalsgaard, Anders Sengupta, Mita E. PLoS One Research Article The importance of hands in the transmission of soil transmitted helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris infections, is under-researched. This is partly because of the absence of a reliable method to quantify the number of eggs on hands. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a method to assess the number of Ascaris eggs on hands and determine the egg recovery rate of the method. Under laboratory conditions, hands were seeded with a known number of Ascaris eggs, air dried and washed in a plastic bag retaining the washing water, in order to determine recovery rates of eggs for four different detergents (cationic [benzethonium chloride 0.1% and cetylpyridinium chloride CPC 0.1%], anionic [7X 1% - quadrafos, glycol ether, and dioctyl sulfoccinate sodium salt] and non-ionic [Tween80 0.1% -polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleate]) and two egg detection methods (McMaster technique and FLOTAC). A modified concentration McMaster technique showed the highest egg recovery rate from bags. Two of the four diluted detergents (benzethonium chloride 0.1% and 7X 1%) also showed a higher egg recovery rate and were then compared with de-ionized water for recovery of helminth eggs from hands. The highest recovery rate (95.6%) was achieved with a hand rinse performed with 7X 1%. Washing hands with de-ionized water resulted in an egg recovery rate of 82.7%. This washing method performed with a low concentration of detergent offers potential for quantitative investigation of contamination of hands with Ascaris eggs and of their role in human infection. Follow-up studies are needed that validate the hand washing method under field conditions, e.g. including people of different age, lower levels of contamination and various levels of hand cleanliness. Public Library of Science 2014-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4011755/ /pubmed/24802859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731 Text en © 2014 Jeandron et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jeandron, Aurelie Ensink, Jeroen H. J. Thamsborg, Stig M. Dalsgaard, Anders Sengupta, Mita E. A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands |
title | A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands |
title_full | A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands |
title_fullStr | A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands |
title_full_unstemmed | A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands |
title_short | A Quantitative Assessment Method for Ascaris Eggs on Hands |
title_sort | quantitative assessment method for ascaris eggs on hands |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeandronaurelie aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT ensinkjeroenhj aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT thamsborgstigm aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT dalsgaardanders aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT senguptamitae aquantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT jeandronaurelie quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT ensinkjeroenhj quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT thamsborgstigm quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT dalsgaardanders quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands AT senguptamitae quantitativeassessmentmethodforascariseggsonhands |