Cargando…
Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis
Biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis are now part of standard practice for disease that proves difficult to control with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. While anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have been commonly used, other targeted biologic therapies with different mec...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812514 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S60740 |
_version_ | 1782314864401711104 |
---|---|
author | Rakieh, Chadi Conaghan, Philip G |
author_facet | Rakieh, Chadi Conaghan, Philip G |
author_sort | Rakieh, Chadi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis are now part of standard practice for disease that proves difficult to control with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. While anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have been commonly used, other targeted biologic therapies with different mechanisms of action are becoming increasingly available. Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein that inhibits the T-cell costimulatory molecules required for T-cell activation. Intravenous abatacept has good clinical efficacy with an acceptably low toxicity profile in rheumatoid arthritis, but the subcutaneous mode of delivery has only recently become available. In this article, we examine key efficacy and safety data for subcutaneous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis, incorporating evidence from five large Phase III studies that included people with an inadequate response to methotrexate and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The results demonstrate that subcutaneous abatacept has efficacy and safety comparable with that of intravenous abatacept and adalimumab. In addition, inhibition of radiographic progression at year 1 in relatively early rheumatoid arthritis is consistent with that of adalimumab. Subcutaneous abatacept is well tolerated, with very low rates of discontinuation in both short-term and long-term follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4011896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40118962014-05-08 Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis Rakieh, Chadi Conaghan, Philip G Ther Clin Risk Manag Review Biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis are now part of standard practice for disease that proves difficult to control with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. While anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have been commonly used, other targeted biologic therapies with different mechanisms of action are becoming increasingly available. Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein that inhibits the T-cell costimulatory molecules required for T-cell activation. Intravenous abatacept has good clinical efficacy with an acceptably low toxicity profile in rheumatoid arthritis, but the subcutaneous mode of delivery has only recently become available. In this article, we examine key efficacy and safety data for subcutaneous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis, incorporating evidence from five large Phase III studies that included people with an inadequate response to methotrexate and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The results demonstrate that subcutaneous abatacept has efficacy and safety comparable with that of intravenous abatacept and adalimumab. In addition, inhibition of radiographic progression at year 1 in relatively early rheumatoid arthritis is consistent with that of adalimumab. Subcutaneous abatacept is well tolerated, with very low rates of discontinuation in both short-term and long-term follow-up. Dove Medical Press 2014-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4011896/ /pubmed/24812514 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S60740 Text en © 2014 Rakieh and Conaghan. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Rakieh, Chadi Conaghan, Philip G Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis |
title | Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full | Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis |
title_fullStr | Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis |
title_short | Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis |
title_sort | comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812514 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S60740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rakiehchadi comparativeclinicalutilityofonceweeklysubcutaneousabataceptinthemanagementofrheumatoidarthritis AT conaghanphilipg comparativeclinicalutilityofonceweeklysubcutaneousabataceptinthemanagementofrheumatoidarthritis |