Cargando…

Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

Biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis are now part of standard practice for disease that proves difficult to control with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. While anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have been commonly used, other targeted biologic therapies with different mec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rakieh, Chadi, Conaghan, Philip G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812514
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S60740
_version_ 1782314864401711104
author Rakieh, Chadi
Conaghan, Philip G
author_facet Rakieh, Chadi
Conaghan, Philip G
author_sort Rakieh, Chadi
collection PubMed
description Biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis are now part of standard practice for disease that proves difficult to control with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. While anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have been commonly used, other targeted biologic therapies with different mechanisms of action are becoming increasingly available. Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein that inhibits the T-cell costimulatory molecules required for T-cell activation. Intravenous abatacept has good clinical efficacy with an acceptably low toxicity profile in rheumatoid arthritis, but the subcutaneous mode of delivery has only recently become available. In this article, we examine key efficacy and safety data for subcutaneous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis, incorporating evidence from five large Phase III studies that included people with an inadequate response to methotrexate and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The results demonstrate that subcutaneous abatacept has efficacy and safety comparable with that of intravenous abatacept and adalimumab. In addition, inhibition of radiographic progression at year 1 in relatively early rheumatoid arthritis is consistent with that of adalimumab. Subcutaneous abatacept is well tolerated, with very low rates of discontinuation in both short-term and long-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4011896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40118962014-05-08 Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis Rakieh, Chadi Conaghan, Philip G Ther Clin Risk Manag Review Biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis are now part of standard practice for disease that proves difficult to control with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. While anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have been commonly used, other targeted biologic therapies with different mechanisms of action are becoming increasingly available. Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein that inhibits the T-cell costimulatory molecules required for T-cell activation. Intravenous abatacept has good clinical efficacy with an acceptably low toxicity profile in rheumatoid arthritis, but the subcutaneous mode of delivery has only recently become available. In this article, we examine key efficacy and safety data for subcutaneous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis, incorporating evidence from five large Phase III studies that included people with an inadequate response to methotrexate and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The results demonstrate that subcutaneous abatacept has efficacy and safety comparable with that of intravenous abatacept and adalimumab. In addition, inhibition of radiographic progression at year 1 in relatively early rheumatoid arthritis is consistent with that of adalimumab. Subcutaneous abatacept is well tolerated, with very low rates of discontinuation in both short-term and long-term follow-up. Dove Medical Press 2014-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4011896/ /pubmed/24812514 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S60740 Text en © 2014 Rakieh and Conaghan. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Rakieh, Chadi
Conaghan, Philip G
Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis
title Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort comparative clinical utility of once-weekly subcutaneous abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4011896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812514
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S60740
work_keys_str_mv AT rakiehchadi comparativeclinicalutilityofonceweeklysubcutaneousabataceptinthemanagementofrheumatoidarthritis
AT conaghanphilipg comparativeclinicalutilityofonceweeklysubcutaneousabataceptinthemanagementofrheumatoidarthritis