Cargando…
A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal at apical 1 mm level after final irrigation activation with an EndoVac system and Max-I probe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups after completing cleaning and s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24808693 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.128661 |
_version_ | 1782314884000645120 |
---|---|
author | Dua, Deepti Dua, Ankur Uppin, Veerendra M. |
author_facet | Dua, Deepti Dua, Ankur Uppin, Veerendra M. |
author_sort | Dua, Deepti |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal at apical 1 mm level after final irrigation activation with an EndoVac system and Max-I probe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups after completing cleaning and shaping with ProTaper rotary files. In one group, final irrigation was performed with an EndoVac system while in the other group final irrigation was performed with a 30 gauge Max-I probe. 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetracetic acid were used as final irrigants in all teeth. After instrumentation and irrigation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally into buccal and palatal halves and viewed under a scanning electron microscope for evaluation of the smear layer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The EndoVac group showed significantly better smear layer removal compared with the Max-I probe at the apical 1 mm level. CONCLUSION: An apical negative pressure system (EndoVac) results in better debridement at apical 1 mm when compared with side-vented closed ended needle irrigation (Max-I probe). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4012115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40121152014-05-07 A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems Dua, Deepti Dua, Ankur Uppin, Veerendra M. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal at apical 1 mm level after final irrigation activation with an EndoVac system and Max-I probe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups after completing cleaning and shaping with ProTaper rotary files. In one group, final irrigation was performed with an EndoVac system while in the other group final irrigation was performed with a 30 gauge Max-I probe. 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetracetic acid were used as final irrigants in all teeth. After instrumentation and irrigation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally into buccal and palatal halves and viewed under a scanning electron microscope for evaluation of the smear layer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The EndoVac group showed significantly better smear layer removal compared with the Max-I probe at the apical 1 mm level. CONCLUSION: An apical negative pressure system (EndoVac) results in better debridement at apical 1 mm when compared with side-vented closed ended needle irrigation (Max-I probe). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4012115/ /pubmed/24808693 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.128661 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dua, Deepti Dua, Ankur Uppin, Veerendra M. A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems |
title | A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems |
title_full | A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems |
title_fullStr | A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems |
title_short | A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems |
title_sort | scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24808693 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.128661 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duadeepti ascanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems AT duaankur ascanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems AT uppinveerendram ascanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems AT duadeepti scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems AT duaankur scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems AT uppinveerendram scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems |