Cargando…

A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal at apical 1 mm level after final irrigation activation with an EndoVac system and Max-I probe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups after completing cleaning and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dua, Deepti, Dua, Ankur, Uppin, Veerendra M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24808693
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.128661
_version_ 1782314884000645120
author Dua, Deepti
Dua, Ankur
Uppin, Veerendra M.
author_facet Dua, Deepti
Dua, Ankur
Uppin, Veerendra M.
author_sort Dua, Deepti
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal at apical 1 mm level after final irrigation activation with an EndoVac system and Max-I probe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups after completing cleaning and shaping with ProTaper rotary files. In one group, final irrigation was performed with an EndoVac system while in the other group final irrigation was performed with a 30 gauge Max-I probe. 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetracetic acid were used as final irrigants in all teeth. After instrumentation and irrigation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally into buccal and palatal halves and viewed under a scanning electron microscope for evaluation of the smear layer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The EndoVac group showed significantly better smear layer removal compared with the Max-I probe at the apical 1 mm level. CONCLUSION: An apical negative pressure system (EndoVac) results in better debridement at apical 1 mm when compared with side-vented closed ended needle irrigation (Max-I probe).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4012115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40121152014-05-07 A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems Dua, Deepti Dua, Ankur Uppin, Veerendra M. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal at apical 1 mm level after final irrigation activation with an EndoVac system and Max-I probe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups after completing cleaning and shaping with ProTaper rotary files. In one group, final irrigation was performed with an EndoVac system while in the other group final irrigation was performed with a 30 gauge Max-I probe. 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetracetic acid were used as final irrigants in all teeth. After instrumentation and irrigation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally into buccal and palatal halves and viewed under a scanning electron microscope for evaluation of the smear layer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The EndoVac group showed significantly better smear layer removal compared with the Max-I probe at the apical 1 mm level. CONCLUSION: An apical negative pressure system (EndoVac) results in better debridement at apical 1 mm when compared with side-vented closed ended needle irrigation (Max-I probe). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4012115/ /pubmed/24808693 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.128661 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dua, Deepti
Dua, Ankur
Uppin, Veerendra M.
A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems
title A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems
title_full A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems
title_fullStr A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems
title_full_unstemmed A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems
title_short A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems
title_sort scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24808693
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.128661
work_keys_str_mv AT duadeepti ascanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems
AT duaankur ascanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems
AT uppinveerendram ascanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems
AT duadeepti scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems
AT duaankur scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems
AT uppinveerendram scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofintracanalsmearlayerremovalbytwodifferentfinalirrigationactivationsystems