Cargando…

Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS?

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a widely used analytical technique in metabolomics. GC provides the highest resolution of any standard chromatographic separation method, and with modern instrumentation, retention times are very consistent between analyses. Electron impact ionization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villas-Bôas, Silas G., Smart, Kathleen F., Sivakumaran, Subathira, Lane, Geoffrey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24957242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo1010003
_version_ 1782314941288546304
author Villas-Bôas, Silas G.
Smart, Kathleen F.
Sivakumaran, Subathira
Lane, Geoffrey A.
author_facet Villas-Bôas, Silas G.
Smart, Kathleen F.
Sivakumaran, Subathira
Lane, Geoffrey A.
author_sort Villas-Bôas, Silas G.
collection PubMed
description Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a widely used analytical technique in metabolomics. GC provides the highest resolution of any standard chromatographic separation method, and with modern instrumentation, retention times are very consistent between analyses. Electron impact ionization and fragmentation is generally reproducible between instruments and extensive libraries of spectra are available that enhance the identification of analytes. The major limitation is the restriction to volatile analytes, and hence the requirement to convert many metabolites to volatile derivatives through chemical derivatization. Here we compared the analytical performance of two derivatization techniques, silylation (TMS) and alkylation (MCF), used for the analysis of amino and non-amino organic acids as well as nucleotides in microbial-derived samples. The widely used TMS derivatization method showed poorer reproducibility and instability during chromatographic runs while the MCF derivatives presented better analytical performance. Therefore, alkylation (MCF) derivatization seems to be preferable for the analysis of polyfunctional amines, nucleotides and organic acids in microbial metabolomics studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4012512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40125122014-05-27 Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS? Villas-Bôas, Silas G. Smart, Kathleen F. Sivakumaran, Subathira Lane, Geoffrey A. Metabolites Article Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a widely used analytical technique in metabolomics. GC provides the highest resolution of any standard chromatographic separation method, and with modern instrumentation, retention times are very consistent between analyses. Electron impact ionization and fragmentation is generally reproducible between instruments and extensive libraries of spectra are available that enhance the identification of analytes. The major limitation is the restriction to volatile analytes, and hence the requirement to convert many metabolites to volatile derivatives through chemical derivatization. Here we compared the analytical performance of two derivatization techniques, silylation (TMS) and alkylation (MCF), used for the analysis of amino and non-amino organic acids as well as nucleotides in microbial-derived samples. The widely used TMS derivatization method showed poorer reproducibility and instability during chromatographic runs while the MCF derivatives presented better analytical performance. Therefore, alkylation (MCF) derivatization seems to be preferable for the analysis of polyfunctional amines, nucleotides and organic acids in microbial metabolomics studies. MDPI 2011-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4012512/ /pubmed/24957242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo1010003 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Villas-Bôas, Silas G.
Smart, Kathleen F.
Sivakumaran, Subathira
Lane, Geoffrey A.
Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS?
title Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS?
title_full Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS?
title_fullStr Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS?
title_full_unstemmed Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS?
title_short Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS?
title_sort alkylation or silylation for analysis of amino and non-amino organic acids by gc-ms?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24957242
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo1010003
work_keys_str_mv AT villasboassilasg alkylationorsilylationforanalysisofaminoandnonaminoorganicacidsbygcms
AT smartkathleenf alkylationorsilylationforanalysisofaminoandnonaminoorganicacidsbygcms
AT sivakumaransubathira alkylationorsilylationforanalysisofaminoandnonaminoorganicacidsbygcms
AT lanegeoffreya alkylationorsilylationforanalysisofaminoandnonaminoorganicacidsbygcms