Cargando…
Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS?
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a widely used analytical technique in metabolomics. GC provides the highest resolution of any standard chromatographic separation method, and with modern instrumentation, retention times are very consistent between analyses. Electron impact ionization...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24957242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo1010003 |
_version_ | 1782314941288546304 |
---|---|
author | Villas-Bôas, Silas G. Smart, Kathleen F. Sivakumaran, Subathira Lane, Geoffrey A. |
author_facet | Villas-Bôas, Silas G. Smart, Kathleen F. Sivakumaran, Subathira Lane, Geoffrey A. |
author_sort | Villas-Bôas, Silas G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a widely used analytical technique in metabolomics. GC provides the highest resolution of any standard chromatographic separation method, and with modern instrumentation, retention times are very consistent between analyses. Electron impact ionization and fragmentation is generally reproducible between instruments and extensive libraries of spectra are available that enhance the identification of analytes. The major limitation is the restriction to volatile analytes, and hence the requirement to convert many metabolites to volatile derivatives through chemical derivatization. Here we compared the analytical performance of two derivatization techniques, silylation (TMS) and alkylation (MCF), used for the analysis of amino and non-amino organic acids as well as nucleotides in microbial-derived samples. The widely used TMS derivatization method showed poorer reproducibility and instability during chromatographic runs while the MCF derivatives presented better analytical performance. Therefore, alkylation (MCF) derivatization seems to be preferable for the analysis of polyfunctional amines, nucleotides and organic acids in microbial metabolomics studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4012512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40125122014-05-27 Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS? Villas-Bôas, Silas G. Smart, Kathleen F. Sivakumaran, Subathira Lane, Geoffrey A. Metabolites Article Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a widely used analytical technique in metabolomics. GC provides the highest resolution of any standard chromatographic separation method, and with modern instrumentation, retention times are very consistent between analyses. Electron impact ionization and fragmentation is generally reproducible between instruments and extensive libraries of spectra are available that enhance the identification of analytes. The major limitation is the restriction to volatile analytes, and hence the requirement to convert many metabolites to volatile derivatives through chemical derivatization. Here we compared the analytical performance of two derivatization techniques, silylation (TMS) and alkylation (MCF), used for the analysis of amino and non-amino organic acids as well as nucleotides in microbial-derived samples. The widely used TMS derivatization method showed poorer reproducibility and instability during chromatographic runs while the MCF derivatives presented better analytical performance. Therefore, alkylation (MCF) derivatization seems to be preferable for the analysis of polyfunctional amines, nucleotides and organic acids in microbial metabolomics studies. MDPI 2011-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4012512/ /pubmed/24957242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo1010003 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Villas-Bôas, Silas G. Smart, Kathleen F. Sivakumaran, Subathira Lane, Geoffrey A. Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS? |
title | Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS? |
title_full | Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS? |
title_fullStr | Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS? |
title_full_unstemmed | Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS? |
title_short | Alkylation or Silylation for Analysis of Amino and Non-Amino Organic Acids by GC-MS? |
title_sort | alkylation or silylation for analysis of amino and non-amino organic acids by gc-ms? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24957242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo1010003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villasboassilasg alkylationorsilylationforanalysisofaminoandnonaminoorganicacidsbygcms AT smartkathleenf alkylationorsilylationforanalysisofaminoandnonaminoorganicacidsbygcms AT sivakumaransubathira alkylationorsilylationforanalysisofaminoandnonaminoorganicacidsbygcms AT lanegeoffreya alkylationorsilylationforanalysisofaminoandnonaminoorganicacidsbygcms |