Cargando…

Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?

BACKGROUND: The number of infants with a birth weight > 97(th) percentile for gestational age has increased over the years. Although some studies have examined the interest of inducing labor for fetuses with macrosomia suspected in utero, only a few have analyzed this suspected macrosomia accordi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vendittelli, Françoise, Rivière, Olivier, Neveu, Brigitte, Lémery, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-156
_version_ 1782314942927470592
author Vendittelli, Françoise
Rivière, Olivier
Neveu, Brigitte
Lémery, Didier
author_facet Vendittelli, Françoise
Rivière, Olivier
Neveu, Brigitte
Lémery, Didier
author_sort Vendittelli, Françoise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of infants with a birth weight > 97(th) percentile for gestational age has increased over the years. Although some studies have examined the interest of inducing labor for fetuses with macrosomia suspected in utero, only a few have analyzed this suspected macrosomia according to estimated weight at each gestational age. Most studies have focused principally on neonatal rather than on maternal (and still less on perineal) outcomes. The principal aim of this study was to assess whether a policy of induction of labor for women with a constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetus might reduce the occurrence of severe perineal tears; the secondary aims of this work were to assess whether this policy would reduce either recourse to cesarean delivery during labor or neonatal complications. METHODS: This historical cohort study (n = 3077) analyzed records from a French perinatal database. Women without diabetes and with a cephalic singleton term pregnancy were eligible for the study. We excluded medically indicated terminations of pregnancy and in utero fetal deaths. Among the pregnancies with fetuses suspected, before birth, of being large-for-gestational-age, we compared those for whom labor was induced from ≥ 37 weeks to ≤ 38 weeks(+ 6 days) (n = 199) to those with expectant obstetrical management (n = 2878). In this intention-to-treat analysis, results were expressed as crude and adjusted relative risks. RESULTS: The mean birth weight was 4012 g ± 421 g. The rate of perineal lesions did not differ between the two groups in either primiparas (aRR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.86-1.31) or multiparas (aRR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.84-1.05). Similarly, neither the cesarean rate (aRR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.82-1.50) nor the risks of resuscitation in the delivery room or of death in the delivery room or in the immediate postpartum or of neonatal transfer to the NICU (aRR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.59-1.50) differed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A policy of induction of labor for women with a constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetus among women without diabetes does not reduce maternal morbidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4012520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40125202014-05-08 Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity? Vendittelli, Françoise Rivière, Olivier Neveu, Brigitte Lémery, Didier BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The number of infants with a birth weight > 97(th) percentile for gestational age has increased over the years. Although some studies have examined the interest of inducing labor for fetuses with macrosomia suspected in utero, only a few have analyzed this suspected macrosomia according to estimated weight at each gestational age. Most studies have focused principally on neonatal rather than on maternal (and still less on perineal) outcomes. The principal aim of this study was to assess whether a policy of induction of labor for women with a constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetus might reduce the occurrence of severe perineal tears; the secondary aims of this work were to assess whether this policy would reduce either recourse to cesarean delivery during labor or neonatal complications. METHODS: This historical cohort study (n = 3077) analyzed records from a French perinatal database. Women without diabetes and with a cephalic singleton term pregnancy were eligible for the study. We excluded medically indicated terminations of pregnancy and in utero fetal deaths. Among the pregnancies with fetuses suspected, before birth, of being large-for-gestational-age, we compared those for whom labor was induced from ≥ 37 weeks to ≤ 38 weeks(+ 6 days) (n = 199) to those with expectant obstetrical management (n = 2878). In this intention-to-treat analysis, results were expressed as crude and adjusted relative risks. RESULTS: The mean birth weight was 4012 g ± 421 g. The rate of perineal lesions did not differ between the two groups in either primiparas (aRR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.86-1.31) or multiparas (aRR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.84-1.05). Similarly, neither the cesarean rate (aRR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.82-1.50) nor the risks of resuscitation in the delivery room or of death in the delivery room or in the immediate postpartum or of neonatal transfer to the NICU (aRR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.59-1.50) differed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A policy of induction of labor for women with a constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetus among women without diabetes does not reduce maternal morbidity. BioMed Central 2014-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4012520/ /pubmed/24885981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-156 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vendittelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vendittelli, Françoise
Rivière, Olivier
Neveu, Brigitte
Lémery, Didier
Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
title Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
title_full Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
title_fullStr Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
title_full_unstemmed Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
title_short Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
title_sort does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-156
work_keys_str_mv AT vendittellifrancoise doesinductionoflaborforconstitutionallylargeforgestationalagefetusesidentifiedinuteroreducematernalmorbidity
AT riviereolivier doesinductionoflaborforconstitutionallylargeforgestationalagefetusesidentifiedinuteroreducematernalmorbidity
AT neveubrigitte doesinductionoflaborforconstitutionallylargeforgestationalagefetusesidentifiedinuteroreducematernalmorbidity
AT lemerydidier doesinductionoflaborforconstitutionallylargeforgestationalagefetusesidentifiedinuteroreducematernalmorbidity