Cargando…

Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures

BACKGROUND: Demand for complete denture treatment is expected to rise over several decades. However, to date, no questionnaire on complete dentures, as evaluated by edentulous patients, has been shown to be reliable and valid. This study sought to assess the reliability and validity of Patient’s Den...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komagamine, Yuriko, Kanazawa, Manabu, Kaiba, Yoshinori, Sato, Yusuke, Minakuchi, Shunsuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-45
_version_ 1782314961537597440
author Komagamine, Yuriko
Kanazawa, Manabu
Kaiba, Yoshinori
Sato, Yusuke
Minakuchi, Shunsuke
author_facet Komagamine, Yuriko
Kanazawa, Manabu
Kaiba, Yoshinori
Sato, Yusuke
Minakuchi, Shunsuke
author_sort Komagamine, Yuriko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Demand for complete denture treatment is expected to rise over several decades. However, to date, no questionnaire on complete dentures, as evaluated by edentulous patients, has been shown to be reliable and valid. This study sought to assess the reliability and validity of Patient’s Denture Assessment (PDA), which provides a multidimensional evaluation of dentures among edentulous patients. METHODS: Patients, who had new complete dentures fabricated at the University Hospital of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University through 2009 to 2010, were enrolled. The reliability of the PDA was determined by examining internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Internal consistency for all of the question items and the six subscales was measured using Cronbach’s α and average inter-item correlation coefficients among 93 participants. For 33 of these participants, test-retest reliability was determined at a 2 month-interval using the interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% confidence interval for the summary scores and the six subscale scores. The PDA was validated in 93 participants by examining the difference in the summary score and the six subscale scores of the PDA before and after replacement with new dentures by the paired t-test. Ability to detect change was also tested in 93 patients using effect size. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s α for the PDA ranged from 0.56 to 0.93. The average inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.28 to 0.83. ICCs for the PDA ranged from 0.37 to 0.83. The paired t-test showed a significant difference between the summary score and the six subscale scores before and after replacement with new dentures (p < 0.05) and the effect size was 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: The PDA demonstrated good reliability by assessing internal consistency and test-retest reliability. In addition, the PDA demonstrated good validity by assessing discriminant validity. Thus, the PDA could help dentists obtain a detailed understanding of the patients’ perceptions in using their dentures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4012717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40127172014-05-08 Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures Komagamine, Yuriko Kanazawa, Manabu Kaiba, Yoshinori Sato, Yusuke Minakuchi, Shunsuke BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Demand for complete denture treatment is expected to rise over several decades. However, to date, no questionnaire on complete dentures, as evaluated by edentulous patients, has been shown to be reliable and valid. This study sought to assess the reliability and validity of Patient’s Denture Assessment (PDA), which provides a multidimensional evaluation of dentures among edentulous patients. METHODS: Patients, who had new complete dentures fabricated at the University Hospital of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University through 2009 to 2010, were enrolled. The reliability of the PDA was determined by examining internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Internal consistency for all of the question items and the six subscales was measured using Cronbach’s α and average inter-item correlation coefficients among 93 participants. For 33 of these participants, test-retest reliability was determined at a 2 month-interval using the interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% confidence interval for the summary scores and the six subscale scores. The PDA was validated in 93 participants by examining the difference in the summary score and the six subscale scores of the PDA before and after replacement with new dentures by the paired t-test. Ability to detect change was also tested in 93 patients using effect size. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s α for the PDA ranged from 0.56 to 0.93. The average inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.28 to 0.83. ICCs for the PDA ranged from 0.37 to 0.83. The paired t-test showed a significant difference between the summary score and the six subscale scores before and after replacement with new dentures (p < 0.05) and the effect size was 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: The PDA demonstrated good reliability by assessing internal consistency and test-retest reliability. In addition, the PDA demonstrated good validity by assessing discriminant validity. Thus, the PDA could help dentists obtain a detailed understanding of the patients’ perceptions in using their dentures. BioMed Central 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4012717/ /pubmed/24885473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-45 Text en Copyright © 2014 Komagamine et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Komagamine, Yuriko
Kanazawa, Manabu
Kaiba, Yoshinori
Sato, Yusuke
Minakuchi, Shunsuke
Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures
title Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures
title_full Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures
title_short Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures
title_sort reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-45
work_keys_str_mv AT komagamineyuriko reliabilityandvalidityofaquestionnaireforselfassessmentofcompletedentures
AT kanazawamanabu reliabilityandvalidityofaquestionnaireforselfassessmentofcompletedentures
AT kaibayoshinori reliabilityandvalidityofaquestionnaireforselfassessmentofcompletedentures
AT satoyusuke reliabilityandvalidityofaquestionnaireforselfassessmentofcompletedentures
AT minakuchishunsuke reliabilityandvalidityofaquestionnaireforselfassessmentofcompletedentures