Cargando…

Expanding Assessments of Translational Research Programs: Supplementing Metrics With Value Judgments

The University of Washington (UW) Institute for Translational Health Sciences (ITHS), funded by a Clinical and Translational Sciences Award program, has supplemented its initial Kellogg Logic Model–based program evaluation with the eight judgment-based evaluative elements of the World Health Organiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Craig S., Nagasawa, Pamela R., Abernethy, Neil F., Ramsey, Bonnie W., Martin, Paul J., Hacker, Beth M., Schwartz, Havivah D., Brock, Douglas M., Robins, Lynn S., Wolf, Fred M., Carter-Dubois, Marie, Disis, Mary L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24064429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163278713500984
Descripción
Sumario:The University of Washington (UW) Institute for Translational Health Sciences (ITHS), funded by a Clinical and Translational Sciences Award program, has supplemented its initial Kellogg Logic Model–based program evaluation with the eight judgment-based evaluative elements of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Health Services Assessment Model. This article describes the relationship between the two models, the rationale for the decision to supplement the evaluation with WHO evaluative elements, the value-added results of the WHO evaluative elements, and plans for further developing the WHO assessments.