Cargando…
‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain
This paper examines the successful campaign in Britain to develop canine distemper vaccine between 1922 and 1933. The campaign mobilized disparate groups around the common cause of using modern science to save the nation's dogs from a deadly disease. Spearheaded by landed patricians associated...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24941736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007087413000344 |
_version_ | 1782315130485211136 |
---|---|
author | BRESALIER, MICHAEL WORBOYS, MICHAEL |
author_facet | BRESALIER, MICHAEL WORBOYS, MICHAEL |
author_sort | BRESALIER, MICHAEL |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper examines the successful campaign in Britain to develop canine distemper vaccine between 1922 and 1933. The campaign mobilized disparate groups around the common cause of using modern science to save the nation's dogs from a deadly disease. Spearheaded by landed patricians associated with the country journal The Field, and funded by dog owners and associations, it relied on collaborations with veterinary professionals, government scientists, the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the commercial pharmaceutical house the Burroughs Wellcome Company (BWC). The social organization of the campaign reveals a number of important, yet previously unexplored, features of interwar science and medicine in Britain. It depended on a patronage system that drew upon a large base of influential benefactors and public subscriptions. Coordinated by the Field Distemper Fund, this system was characterized by close relationships between landed elites and their social networks with senior science administrators and researchers. Relations between experts and non-experts were crucial, with high levels of public engagement in all aspects of research and vaccine development. At the same time, experimental and commercial research supported under the campaign saw dynamic interactions between animal and human medicine, which shaped the organization of the MRC's research programme and demonstrated the value of close collaboration between veterinary and medical science, with the dog as a shared object and resource. Finally, the campaign made possible the translation of ‘laboratory’ findings into field conditions and commercial products. Rather than a unidirectional process, translation involved negotiations over the very boundaries of the ‘laboratory’ and the ‘field’, and what constituted a viable vaccine. This paper suggests that historians reconsider standard historical accounts of the nature of patronage, the role of animals, and the interests of landed elites in interwar British science and medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4014013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40140132014-05-08 ‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain BRESALIER, MICHAEL WORBOYS, MICHAEL Br J Hist Sci Research Article This paper examines the successful campaign in Britain to develop canine distemper vaccine between 1922 and 1933. The campaign mobilized disparate groups around the common cause of using modern science to save the nation's dogs from a deadly disease. Spearheaded by landed patricians associated with the country journal The Field, and funded by dog owners and associations, it relied on collaborations with veterinary professionals, government scientists, the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the commercial pharmaceutical house the Burroughs Wellcome Company (BWC). The social organization of the campaign reveals a number of important, yet previously unexplored, features of interwar science and medicine in Britain. It depended on a patronage system that drew upon a large base of influential benefactors and public subscriptions. Coordinated by the Field Distemper Fund, this system was characterized by close relationships between landed elites and their social networks with senior science administrators and researchers. Relations between experts and non-experts were crucial, with high levels of public engagement in all aspects of research and vaccine development. At the same time, experimental and commercial research supported under the campaign saw dynamic interactions between animal and human medicine, which shaped the organization of the MRC's research programme and demonstrated the value of close collaboration between veterinary and medical science, with the dog as a shared object and resource. Finally, the campaign made possible the translation of ‘laboratory’ findings into field conditions and commercial products. Rather than a unidirectional process, translation involved negotiations over the very boundaries of the ‘laboratory’ and the ‘field’, and what constituted a viable vaccine. This paper suggests that historians reconsider standard historical accounts of the nature of patronage, the role of animals, and the interests of landed elites in interwar British science and medicine. Cambridge University Press 2014-06 2013-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4014013/ /pubmed/24941736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007087413000344 Text en © British Society for the History of Science 2013 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article BRESALIER, MICHAEL WORBOYS, MICHAEL ‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain |
title | ‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain |
title_full | ‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain |
title_fullStr | ‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain |
title_short | ‘Saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar Britain |
title_sort | ‘saving the lives of our dogs’: the development of canine distemper vaccine in interwar britain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24941736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007087413000344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bresaliermichael savingthelivesofourdogsthedevelopmentofcaninedistempervaccineininterwarbritain AT worboysmichael savingthelivesofourdogsthedevelopmentofcaninedistempervaccineininterwarbritain |