Cargando…

Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer

Accurate dose delivery is essential for the success of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with head-and-neck (HN) cancer. Reproducibility of IMRT dose delivery to HN regions can be critically influenced by treatment-related changes in body contours. Moreover, some set-up margi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motegi, Kana, Kohno, Ryosuke, Ueda, Takashi, Shibuya, Toshiyuki, Ariji, Takaki, Kawashima, Mitsuhiko, Akimoto, Tetsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24449713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt143
_version_ 1782315146787422208
author Motegi, Kana
Kohno, Ryosuke
Ueda, Takashi
Shibuya, Toshiyuki
Ariji, Takaki
Kawashima, Mitsuhiko
Akimoto, Tetsuo
author_facet Motegi, Kana
Kohno, Ryosuke
Ueda, Takashi
Shibuya, Toshiyuki
Ariji, Takaki
Kawashima, Mitsuhiko
Akimoto, Tetsuo
author_sort Motegi, Kana
collection PubMed
description Accurate dose delivery is essential for the success of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with head-and-neck (HN) cancer. Reproducibility of IMRT dose delivery to HN regions can be critically influenced by treatment-related changes in body contours. Moreover, some set-up margins may not be adaptable to positional uncertainties of HN structures at every treatment. To obtain evidence for appropriate set-up margins in various head and neck areas, we prospectively evaluated positional deviation (δ values) of four bony landmarks (i.e. the clivus and occipital protuberance for the head region, and the mental protuberance and C5 for the neck region) using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography during a treatment course. Over 800 δ values were analyzed in each translational direction. Positional uncertainties for HN cancer patients undergoing IMRT were evaluated relative to the body mass index. Low positional accuracy was observed for the neck region compared with the head region. For the head region, most of the δ was distributed within ±5 mm, and use of the current set-up margin was appropriate. However, the δ values for the neck region were within ±8 mm. Especially for overweight patients, a few millimeters needed to be added to give an adequate set-up margin. For accurate dose delivery to targets and to avoid excess exposure to normal tissues, we recommend that the positional verification process be performed before every treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4014166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40141662014-05-12 Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer Motegi, Kana Kohno, Ryosuke Ueda, Takashi Shibuya, Toshiyuki Ariji, Takaki Kawashima, Mitsuhiko Akimoto, Tetsuo J Radiat Res Oncology Accurate dose delivery is essential for the success of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with head-and-neck (HN) cancer. Reproducibility of IMRT dose delivery to HN regions can be critically influenced by treatment-related changes in body contours. Moreover, some set-up margins may not be adaptable to positional uncertainties of HN structures at every treatment. To obtain evidence for appropriate set-up margins in various head and neck areas, we prospectively evaluated positional deviation (δ values) of four bony landmarks (i.e. the clivus and occipital protuberance for the head region, and the mental protuberance and C5 for the neck region) using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography during a treatment course. Over 800 δ values were analyzed in each translational direction. Positional uncertainties for HN cancer patients undergoing IMRT were evaluated relative to the body mass index. Low positional accuracy was observed for the neck region compared with the head region. For the head region, most of the δ was distributed within ±5 mm, and use of the current set-up margin was appropriate. However, the δ values for the neck region were within ±8 mm. Especially for overweight patients, a few millimeters needed to be added to give an adequate set-up margin. For accurate dose delivery to targets and to avoid excess exposure to normal tissues, we recommend that the positional verification process be performed before every treatment. Oxford University Press 2014-05 2014-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4014166/ /pubmed/24449713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt143 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Motegi, Kana
Kohno, Ryosuke
Ueda, Takashi
Shibuya, Toshiyuki
Ariji, Takaki
Kawashima, Mitsuhiko
Akimoto, Tetsuo
Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer
title Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer
title_full Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer
title_fullStr Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer
title_short Evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for IMRT with head-and-neck cancer
title_sort evaluating positional accuracy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for imrt with head-and-neck cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24449713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt143
work_keys_str_mv AT motegikana evaluatingpositionalaccuracyusingmegavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographyforimrtwithheadandneckcancer
AT kohnoryosuke evaluatingpositionalaccuracyusingmegavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographyforimrtwithheadandneckcancer
AT uedatakashi evaluatingpositionalaccuracyusingmegavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographyforimrtwithheadandneckcancer
AT shibuyatoshiyuki evaluatingpositionalaccuracyusingmegavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographyforimrtwithheadandneckcancer
AT arijitakaki evaluatingpositionalaccuracyusingmegavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographyforimrtwithheadandneckcancer
AT kawashimamitsuhiko evaluatingpositionalaccuracyusingmegavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographyforimrtwithheadandneckcancer
AT akimototetsuo evaluatingpositionalaccuracyusingmegavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographyforimrtwithheadandneckcancer