Cargando…

Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana

Unlike most languages that are written using a single script, Japanese uses multiple scripts including morphographic Kanji and syllabographic Hiragana and Katakana. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging with dynamic causal modeling to investigate competing theories regarding the neural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawabata Duncan, Keith J., Twomey, Tae, Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi, Seghier, Mohamed L., Haji, Tomoki, Sakai, Katsuyuki, Price, Cathy J., Devlin, Joseph T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23382515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht015
_version_ 1782315149731823616
author Kawabata Duncan, Keith J.
Twomey, Tae
Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi
Seghier, Mohamed L.
Haji, Tomoki
Sakai, Katsuyuki
Price, Cathy J.
Devlin, Joseph T.
author_facet Kawabata Duncan, Keith J.
Twomey, Tae
Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi
Seghier, Mohamed L.
Haji, Tomoki
Sakai, Katsuyuki
Price, Cathy J.
Devlin, Joseph T.
author_sort Kawabata Duncan, Keith J.
collection PubMed
description Unlike most languages that are written using a single script, Japanese uses multiple scripts including morphographic Kanji and syllabographic Hiragana and Katakana. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging with dynamic causal modeling to investigate competing theories regarding the neural processing of Kanji and Hiragana during a visual lexical decision task. First, a bilateral model investigated interhemispheric connectivity between ventral occipito–temporal (vOT) cortex and Broca's area (“pars opercularis”). We found that Kanji significantly increased the connection strength from right-to-left vOT. This is interpreted in terms of increased right vOT activity for visually complex Kanji being integrated into the left (i.e. language dominant) hemisphere. Secondly, we used a unilateral left hemisphere model to test whether Kanji and Hiragana rely preferentially on ventral and dorsal paths, respectively, that is, they have different intrahemispheric functional connectivity profiles. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that Kanji increased connectivity within the ventral path (V1 ↔ vOT ↔ Broca's area), and that Hiragana increased connectivity within the dorsal path (V1 ↔ supramarginal gyrus ↔ Broca's area). Overall, the results illustrate how the differential processing demands of Kanji and Hiragana influence both inter- and intrahemispheric interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4014181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40141812014-05-12 Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana Kawabata Duncan, Keith J. Twomey, Tae Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi Seghier, Mohamed L. Haji, Tomoki Sakai, Katsuyuki Price, Cathy J. Devlin, Joseph T. Cereb Cortex Articles Unlike most languages that are written using a single script, Japanese uses multiple scripts including morphographic Kanji and syllabographic Hiragana and Katakana. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging with dynamic causal modeling to investigate competing theories regarding the neural processing of Kanji and Hiragana during a visual lexical decision task. First, a bilateral model investigated interhemispheric connectivity between ventral occipito–temporal (vOT) cortex and Broca's area (“pars opercularis”). We found that Kanji significantly increased the connection strength from right-to-left vOT. This is interpreted in terms of increased right vOT activity for visually complex Kanji being integrated into the left (i.e. language dominant) hemisphere. Secondly, we used a unilateral left hemisphere model to test whether Kanji and Hiragana rely preferentially on ventral and dorsal paths, respectively, that is, they have different intrahemispheric functional connectivity profiles. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that Kanji increased connectivity within the ventral path (V1 ↔ vOT ↔ Broca's area), and that Hiragana increased connectivity within the dorsal path (V1 ↔ supramarginal gyrus ↔ Broca's area). Overall, the results illustrate how the differential processing demands of Kanji and Hiragana influence both inter- and intrahemispheric interactions. Oxford University Press 2014-06 2013-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4014181/ /pubmed/23382515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht015 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Kawabata Duncan, Keith J.
Twomey, Tae
Parker Jones, ‘Ōiwi
Seghier, Mohamed L.
Haji, Tomoki
Sakai, Katsuyuki
Price, Cathy J.
Devlin, Joseph T.
Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana
title Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana
title_full Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana
title_fullStr Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana
title_full_unstemmed Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana
title_short Inter- and Intrahemispheric Connectivity Differences When Reading Japanese Kanji and Hiragana
title_sort inter- and intrahemispheric connectivity differences when reading japanese kanji and hiragana
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23382515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht015
work_keys_str_mv AT kawabataduncankeithj interandintrahemisphericconnectivitydifferenceswhenreadingjapanesekanjiandhiragana
AT twomeytae interandintrahemisphericconnectivitydifferenceswhenreadingjapanesekanjiandhiragana
AT parkerjonesoiwi interandintrahemisphericconnectivitydifferenceswhenreadingjapanesekanjiandhiragana
AT seghiermohamedl interandintrahemisphericconnectivitydifferenceswhenreadingjapanesekanjiandhiragana
AT hajitomoki interandintrahemisphericconnectivitydifferenceswhenreadingjapanesekanjiandhiragana
AT sakaikatsuyuki interandintrahemisphericconnectivitydifferenceswhenreadingjapanesekanjiandhiragana
AT pricecathyj interandintrahemisphericconnectivitydifferenceswhenreadingjapanesekanjiandhiragana
AT devlinjosepht interandintrahemisphericconnectivitydifferenceswhenreadingjapanesekanjiandhiragana