Cargando…

Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians

Clinical performance feedback is an important component of the ongoing development and education of health care practitioners. For physicians, feedback about their clinical practice and outcomes is central to developing both confidence and competence at all stages of their medical careers. Cultural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaye, Alan David, Okanlawon, Olutoyin J, Urman, Richard D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S62165
_version_ 1782315159463657472
author Kaye, Alan David
Okanlawon, Olutoyin J
Urman, Richard D
author_facet Kaye, Alan David
Okanlawon, Olutoyin J
Urman, Richard D
author_sort Kaye, Alan David
collection PubMed
description Clinical performance feedback is an important component of the ongoing development and education of health care practitioners. For physicians, feedback about their clinical practice and outcomes is central to developing both confidence and competence at all stages of their medical careers. Cultural and financial infrastructures need to be in place, and the concept of feedback needs to be readily embraced and encouraged by clinical leadership and other stakeholders. The “buy-in” includes the expectation and view that feedback occurs on a routine basis, and those engaged in the process are both encouraged to participate and held accountable. Feedback must be part of an overarching quality improvement and physician education agenda; it is not meant to be an isolated, fragmented initiative that is typically undermined by lack of resources or systemic barriers to gaining improvement within programs. Effective feedback should be an integral part of clinical practice. Anesthesiologists and other perioperative physicians are identifying specialty-specific indicators that can be used when creating a broader quality improvement agenda. Placing a more immediate formal feedback strategy that focuses on goal-oriented behavior is rapidly becoming a mainstay. Physicians may use their individual feedback reports for reflection and designing personal development plans as lifelong learners and leaders in improving patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4014376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40143762014-05-15 Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians Kaye, Alan David Okanlawon, Olutoyin J Urman, Richard D Adv Med Educ Pract Review Clinical performance feedback is an important component of the ongoing development and education of health care practitioners. For physicians, feedback about their clinical practice and outcomes is central to developing both confidence and competence at all stages of their medical careers. Cultural and financial infrastructures need to be in place, and the concept of feedback needs to be readily embraced and encouraged by clinical leadership and other stakeholders. The “buy-in” includes the expectation and view that feedback occurs on a routine basis, and those engaged in the process are both encouraged to participate and held accountable. Feedback must be part of an overarching quality improvement and physician education agenda; it is not meant to be an isolated, fragmented initiative that is typically undermined by lack of resources or systemic barriers to gaining improvement within programs. Effective feedback should be an integral part of clinical practice. Anesthesiologists and other perioperative physicians are identifying specialty-specific indicators that can be used when creating a broader quality improvement agenda. Placing a more immediate formal feedback strategy that focuses on goal-oriented behavior is rapidly becoming a mainstay. Physicians may use their individual feedback reports for reflection and designing personal development plans as lifelong learners and leaders in improving patient care. Dove Medical Press 2014-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4014376/ /pubmed/24833948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S62165 Text en © 2014 Kaye et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Kaye, Alan David
Okanlawon, Olutoyin J
Urman, Richard D
Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians
title Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians
title_full Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians
title_fullStr Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians
title_short Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians
title_sort clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S62165
work_keys_str_mv AT kayealandavid clinicalperformancefeedbackandqualityimprovementopportunitiesforperioperativephysicians
AT okanlawonolutoyinj clinicalperformancefeedbackandqualityimprovementopportunitiesforperioperativephysicians
AT urmanrichardd clinicalperformancefeedbackandqualityimprovementopportunitiesforperioperativephysicians