Cargando…
Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility
Increasing numbers of research studies test interventions for clinicians in addition to or instead of interventions for patients. Although previous studies have enumerated barriers to patient enrolment in clinical trials, corresponding barriers have not been identified for enrolling clinicians as su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24153049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-125 |
_version_ | 1782315289052971008 |
---|---|
author | Hysong, Sylvia J Smitham, Kristen Broussard Knox, Melissa Johnson, Khai-El SoRelle, Richard Haidet, Paul |
author_facet | Hysong, Sylvia J Smitham, Kristen Broussard Knox, Melissa Johnson, Khai-El SoRelle, Richard Haidet, Paul |
author_sort | Hysong, Sylvia J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing numbers of research studies test interventions for clinicians in addition to or instead of interventions for patients. Although previous studies have enumerated barriers to patient enrolment in clinical trials, corresponding barriers have not been identified for enrolling clinicians as subjects. We propose a framework of metrics for evidence-based estimation of time and resources required for recruiting clinicians as research participants, and present an example from a federally funded study. Our framework proposes metrics for tracking five steps in the recruitment process: gaining entry into facilities, obtaining accurate eligibility and contact information, reaching busy clinicians, assessing willingness to participate, and scheduling participants for data collection. We analyzed recruitment records from a qualitative study exploring performance feedback at US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs); five recruiters sought to reach two clinicians at 16 facilities for a one-hour interview. Objective metrics were calculable for all five steps; metric values varied considerably across facilities. Obtaining accurate contact information slowed down recruiting the most. We conclude that successfully recruiting even small numbers of employees requires considerable resourcefulness and more calendar time than anticipated. Our proposed framework provides an empirical basis for estimating research-recruitment timelines, planning subject-recruitment strategies, and assessing the research accessibility of clinical sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4015152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40151522014-05-10 Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility Hysong, Sylvia J Smitham, Kristen Broussard Knox, Melissa Johnson, Khai-El SoRelle, Richard Haidet, Paul Implement Sci Short Report Increasing numbers of research studies test interventions for clinicians in addition to or instead of interventions for patients. Although previous studies have enumerated barriers to patient enrolment in clinical trials, corresponding barriers have not been identified for enrolling clinicians as subjects. We propose a framework of metrics for evidence-based estimation of time and resources required for recruiting clinicians as research participants, and present an example from a federally funded study. Our framework proposes metrics for tracking five steps in the recruitment process: gaining entry into facilities, obtaining accurate eligibility and contact information, reaching busy clinicians, assessing willingness to participate, and scheduling participants for data collection. We analyzed recruitment records from a qualitative study exploring performance feedback at US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs); five recruiters sought to reach two clinicians at 16 facilities for a one-hour interview. Objective metrics were calculable for all five steps; metric values varied considerably across facilities. Obtaining accurate contact information slowed down recruiting the most. We conclude that successfully recruiting even small numbers of employees requires considerable resourcefulness and more calendar time than anticipated. Our proposed framework provides an empirical basis for estimating research-recruitment timelines, planning subject-recruitment strategies, and assessing the research accessibility of clinical sites. BioMed Central 2013-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4015152/ /pubmed/24153049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-125 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hysong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Hysong, Sylvia J Smitham, Kristen Broussard Knox, Melissa Johnson, Khai-El SoRelle, Richard Haidet, Paul Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility |
title | Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility |
title_full | Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility |
title_fullStr | Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility |
title_full_unstemmed | Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility |
title_short | Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility |
title_sort | recruiting clinical personnel as research participants: a framework for assessing feasibility |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24153049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hysongsylviaj recruitingclinicalpersonnelasresearchparticipantsaframeworkforassessingfeasibility AT smithamkristenbroussard recruitingclinicalpersonnelasresearchparticipantsaframeworkforassessingfeasibility AT knoxmelissa recruitingclinicalpersonnelasresearchparticipantsaframeworkforassessingfeasibility AT johnsonkhaiel recruitingclinicalpersonnelasresearchparticipantsaframeworkforassessingfeasibility AT sorellerichard recruitingclinicalpersonnelasresearchparticipantsaframeworkforassessingfeasibility AT haidetpaul recruitingclinicalpersonnelasresearchparticipantsaframeworkforassessingfeasibility |