Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to treatment with glimepiride. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, 24‐week (12‐week observation and 12‐week treatment) study compared alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg in combination with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seino, Yutaka, Hiroi, Shinzo, Hirayama, Masashi, Kaku, Kohei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00226.x
_version_ 1782315337267544064
author Seino, Yutaka
Hiroi, Shinzo
Hirayama, Masashi
Kaku, Kohei
author_facet Seino, Yutaka
Hiroi, Shinzo
Hirayama, Masashi
Kaku, Kohei
author_sort Seino, Yutaka
collection PubMed
description AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to treatment with glimepiride. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, 24‐week (12‐week observation and 12‐week treatment) study compared alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg in combination with glimepiride (1–4 mg/day) vs placebo added to glimepiride monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who had poor glycemic control despite treatment with diet and exercise plus a sulfonylurea. The primary end‐point was a change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA (1c)) from baseline. A 40‐week open‐label extension study evaluated the long‐term safety and efficacy of the combination. RESULTS: Alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg in combination with glimepiride significantly decreased HbA (1c) compared with glimepiride monotherapy after 12 weeks' treatment (−0.59, −0.65 and 0.35%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both combination groups vs glimepiride monotherapy). Alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg combination therapy was also associated with significantly higher responder rates (HbA (1c) <6.9%: 9.6% and 7.7%, HbA (1c) <7.4%: 29.8% and 34.6%) compared with glimepiride monotherapy (HbA (1c) <6.9%: 0%, HbA (1c) <7.4%: 3.9%). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between glimepiride monotherapy and alogliptin combination treatment, with most reported adverse events being mild in severity. In the extension study, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between the combination groups, with the majority of adverse events being mild. CONCLUSIONS: Once‐daily alogliptin was effective and generally well tolerated when given as add‐on therapy to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control on sulfonylurea plus lifestyle measures. Clinical benefits were maintained for 52 weeks. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (double‐blind study no. NCT01318083; long‐term study no. NCT01318135).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4015431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Wiley-Blackwell
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40154312014-05-19 Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study Seino, Yutaka Hiroi, Shinzo Hirayama, Masashi Kaku, Kohei J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to treatment with glimepiride. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, 24‐week (12‐week observation and 12‐week treatment) study compared alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg in combination with glimepiride (1–4 mg/day) vs placebo added to glimepiride monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who had poor glycemic control despite treatment with diet and exercise plus a sulfonylurea. The primary end‐point was a change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA (1c)) from baseline. A 40‐week open‐label extension study evaluated the long‐term safety and efficacy of the combination. RESULTS: Alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg in combination with glimepiride significantly decreased HbA (1c) compared with glimepiride monotherapy after 12 weeks' treatment (−0.59, −0.65 and 0.35%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both combination groups vs glimepiride monotherapy). Alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg combination therapy was also associated with significantly higher responder rates (HbA (1c) <6.9%: 9.6% and 7.7%, HbA (1c) <7.4%: 29.8% and 34.6%) compared with glimepiride monotherapy (HbA (1c) <6.9%: 0%, HbA (1c) <7.4%: 3.9%). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between glimepiride monotherapy and alogliptin combination treatment, with most reported adverse events being mild in severity. In the extension study, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between the combination groups, with the majority of adverse events being mild. CONCLUSIONS: Once‐daily alogliptin was effective and generally well tolerated when given as add‐on therapy to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control on sulfonylurea plus lifestyle measures. Clinical benefits were maintained for 52 weeks. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (double‐blind study no. NCT01318083; long‐term study no. NCT01318135). Wiley-Blackwell 2012-07-12 2012-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4015431/ /pubmed/24843617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00226.x Text en Copyright © 2012 Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
spellingShingle Articles
Seino, Yutaka
Hiroi, Shinzo
Hirayama, Masashi
Kaku, Kohei
Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study
title Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study
title_full Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study
title_short Efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study
title_sort efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to sulfonylurea in japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label, long‐term extension study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00226.x
work_keys_str_mv AT seinoyutaka efficacyandsafetyofalogliptinaddedtosulfonylureainjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialwithanopenlabellongtermextensionstudy
AT hiroishinzo efficacyandsafetyofalogliptinaddedtosulfonylureainjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialwithanopenlabellongtermextensionstudy
AT hirayamamasashi efficacyandsafetyofalogliptinaddedtosulfonylureainjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialwithanopenlabellongtermextensionstudy
AT kakukohei efficacyandsafetyofalogliptinaddedtosulfonylureainjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrialwithanopenlabellongtermextensionstudy