Cargando…
Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria – a longitudinal evaluation
BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the incidence of cervical cancer and cervical cancer mortality in Austria has declined by varying degrees. The Pap smear is to be considered a causal factor for this decline. METHODS: This longitudinal analysis is based on a data set of Pap smear assessments collected...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24152300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-998 |
_version_ | 1782315355950022656 |
---|---|
author | Rásky, Éva Regitnig, Peter Schenouda, Michél Burkert, Nathalie Freidl, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Rásky, Éva Regitnig, Peter Schenouda, Michél Burkert, Nathalie Freidl, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Rásky, Éva |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the incidence of cervical cancer and cervical cancer mortality in Austria has declined by varying degrees. The Pap smear is to be considered a causal factor for this decline. METHODS: This longitudinal analysis is based on a data set of Pap smear assessments collected by the Committee for Quality Assurance of the Austrian Society of Cytology. Data from 15 laboratories participating in a voluntary self-monitoring program was analyzed for the time span 2004–2008. The data was analyzed in terms of smear quality and assessment quality. A rank-correlation-test for a monotonic trend analysis in the proportion of the three parameters Pap 0, “satisfactory, but limited/SBL”, and Pap IIID/IV for the timespan 2004 to 2008 was carried out. RESULTS: For this study, we analyzed an average number of 730,000 smears per year over a five-year period. Specimens from all but two laboratories, i.e. < 2% of all smears, met the quality criterion for Pap 0 (Bethesda 2001 equivalent: Specimen processed and examined, but unsatisfactory for evaluation of epithelial abnormality), whilst only four laboratories, i.e. < 10% of all smears, reached the national requirement for smears classified as “satisfactory, but limited/SBL”. When using the Pap IIID/IV ratio (LSIL: HSIL/AIS ratio) of 3:1 to 8:1 as a surrogate quality marker for the interpretation of smears, only five laboratories met this criterion during the survey period. The trend analysis indicated only that an increasing number of samples per year is correlated with an increased proportion of Pap 0 and “satisfactory, but limited/SBL” smears. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants get regular feedback about their results, no general improvements in smear taking or assessment were observed over the years, so mandatory quality management, including the possibility of sanctions, is suggested in order to reduce adverse health effects for women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4015555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40155552014-05-10 Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria – a longitudinal evaluation Rásky, Éva Regitnig, Peter Schenouda, Michél Burkert, Nathalie Freidl, Wolfgang BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the incidence of cervical cancer and cervical cancer mortality in Austria has declined by varying degrees. The Pap smear is to be considered a causal factor for this decline. METHODS: This longitudinal analysis is based on a data set of Pap smear assessments collected by the Committee for Quality Assurance of the Austrian Society of Cytology. Data from 15 laboratories participating in a voluntary self-monitoring program was analyzed for the time span 2004–2008. The data was analyzed in terms of smear quality and assessment quality. A rank-correlation-test for a monotonic trend analysis in the proportion of the three parameters Pap 0, “satisfactory, but limited/SBL”, and Pap IIID/IV for the timespan 2004 to 2008 was carried out. RESULTS: For this study, we analyzed an average number of 730,000 smears per year over a five-year period. Specimens from all but two laboratories, i.e. < 2% of all smears, met the quality criterion for Pap 0 (Bethesda 2001 equivalent: Specimen processed and examined, but unsatisfactory for evaluation of epithelial abnormality), whilst only four laboratories, i.e. < 10% of all smears, reached the national requirement for smears classified as “satisfactory, but limited/SBL”. When using the Pap IIID/IV ratio (LSIL: HSIL/AIS ratio) of 3:1 to 8:1 as a surrogate quality marker for the interpretation of smears, only five laboratories met this criterion during the survey period. The trend analysis indicated only that an increasing number of samples per year is correlated with an increased proportion of Pap 0 and “satisfactory, but limited/SBL” smears. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants get regular feedback about their results, no general improvements in smear taking or assessment were observed over the years, so mandatory quality management, including the possibility of sanctions, is suggested in order to reduce adverse health effects for women. BioMed Central 2013-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4015555/ /pubmed/24152300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-998 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rásky et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rásky, Éva Regitnig, Peter Schenouda, Michél Burkert, Nathalie Freidl, Wolfgang Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria – a longitudinal evaluation |
title | Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria – a longitudinal evaluation |
title_full | Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria – a longitudinal evaluation |
title_fullStr | Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria – a longitudinal evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria – a longitudinal evaluation |
title_short | Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria – a longitudinal evaluation |
title_sort | quality of screening with conventional pap smear in austria – a longitudinal evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24152300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-998 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raskyeva qualityofscreeningwithconventionalpapsmearinaustriaalongitudinalevaluation AT regitnigpeter qualityofscreeningwithconventionalpapsmearinaustriaalongitudinalevaluation AT schenoudamichel qualityofscreeningwithconventionalpapsmearinaustriaalongitudinalevaluation AT burkertnathalie qualityofscreeningwithconventionalpapsmearinaustriaalongitudinalevaluation AT freidlwolfgang qualityofscreeningwithconventionalpapsmearinaustriaalongitudinalevaluation |