Cargando…

Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines may improve treatment quality, but the uptake of guideline recommendations is often incomplete and slow. Recently new low back pain guidelines are being launched in Denmark. The guidelines are considered to reduce personal and public costs. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riis, Allan, Jensen, Cathrine Elgaard, Bro, Flemming, Maindal, Helle Terkildsen, Petersen, Karin Dam, Jensen, Martin Bach
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-124
_version_ 1782315385305956352
author Riis, Allan
Jensen, Cathrine Elgaard
Bro, Flemming
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Petersen, Karin Dam
Jensen, Martin Bach
author_facet Riis, Allan
Jensen, Cathrine Elgaard
Bro, Flemming
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Petersen, Karin Dam
Jensen, Martin Bach
author_sort Riis, Allan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines may improve treatment quality, but the uptake of guideline recommendations is often incomplete and slow. Recently new low back pain guidelines are being launched in Denmark. The guidelines are considered to reduce personal and public costs. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a complex, multifaceted implementation strategy of the low back pain guidelines will reduce secondary care referral and improve patient outcomes compared to the usual simple implementation strategy. METHODS/DESIGN: In a two-armed cluster randomised trial, 100 general practices (clusters) and 2,700 patients aged 18 to 65 years from the North Denmark region will be included. Practices are randomly allocated 1:1 to a simple or a complex implementation strategy. Intervention practices will receive a complex implementation strategy, including guideline facilitator visits, stratification tools, and quality reports on low back pain treatment. Primary outcome is referral to secondary care. Secondary outcomes are pain, physical function, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction with care and treatment outcome, employment status, and sick leave. Primary and secondary outcomes pertain to the patient level. Assessments of outcomes are blinded and follow the intention-to-treat principle. Additionally, a process assessment will evaluate the degree to which the intervention elements will be delivered as planned, as well as measure changes in beliefs and behaviours among general practitioners and patients. DISCUSSION: This study provides knowledge concerning the process and effect of an intervention to implement low back pain guidelines in general practice, and will provide insight on essential elements to include in future implementation strategies in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered as NCT01699256 on ClinicalTrials.gov.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4015716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40157162014-05-10 Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial Riis, Allan Jensen, Cathrine Elgaard Bro, Flemming Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Petersen, Karin Dam Jensen, Martin Bach Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines may improve treatment quality, but the uptake of guideline recommendations is often incomplete and slow. Recently new low back pain guidelines are being launched in Denmark. The guidelines are considered to reduce personal and public costs. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a complex, multifaceted implementation strategy of the low back pain guidelines will reduce secondary care referral and improve patient outcomes compared to the usual simple implementation strategy. METHODS/DESIGN: In a two-armed cluster randomised trial, 100 general practices (clusters) and 2,700 patients aged 18 to 65 years from the North Denmark region will be included. Practices are randomly allocated 1:1 to a simple or a complex implementation strategy. Intervention practices will receive a complex implementation strategy, including guideline facilitator visits, stratification tools, and quality reports on low back pain treatment. Primary outcome is referral to secondary care. Secondary outcomes are pain, physical function, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction with care and treatment outcome, employment status, and sick leave. Primary and secondary outcomes pertain to the patient level. Assessments of outcomes are blinded and follow the intention-to-treat principle. Additionally, a process assessment will evaluate the degree to which the intervention elements will be delivered as planned, as well as measure changes in beliefs and behaviours among general practitioners and patients. DISCUSSION: This study provides knowledge concerning the process and effect of an intervention to implement low back pain guidelines in general practice, and will provide insight on essential elements to include in future implementation strategies in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered as NCT01699256 on ClinicalTrials.gov. BioMed Central 2013-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4015716/ /pubmed/24139140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-124 Text en Copyright © 2013 Riis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Riis, Allan
Jensen, Cathrine Elgaard
Bro, Flemming
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Petersen, Karin Dam
Jensen, Martin Bach
Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort enhanced implementation of low back pain guidelines in general practice: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-124
work_keys_str_mv AT riisallan enhancedimplementationoflowbackpainguidelinesingeneralpracticestudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jensencathrineelgaard enhancedimplementationoflowbackpainguidelinesingeneralpracticestudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT broflemming enhancedimplementationoflowbackpainguidelinesingeneralpracticestudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maindalhelleterkildsen enhancedimplementationoflowbackpainguidelinesingeneralpracticestudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT petersenkarindam enhancedimplementationoflowbackpainguidelinesingeneralpracticestudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jensenmartinbach enhancedimplementationoflowbackpainguidelinesingeneralpracticestudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial