Cargando…
The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method
BACKGROUND: The DerSimonian and Laird approach (DL) is widely used for random effects meta-analysis, but this often results in inappropriate type I error rates. The method described by Hartung, Knapp, Sidik and Jonkman (HKSJ) is known to perform better when trials of similar size are combined. Howev...
Autores principales: | IntHout, Joanna, Ioannidis, John PA, Borm, George F |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24548571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-25 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies
por: Röver, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform network meta‐analyses with random inconsistency effects
por: Jackson, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A new justification of the Hartung‐Knapp method for random‐effects meta‐analysis based on weighted least squares regression
por: van Aert, Robbie C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Hartung‐Knapp modification for random‐effects meta‐analysis: A useful refinement but are there any residual concerns?
por: Jackson, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Kidder & Laird
Publicado: (1882)